http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dj0Rz9ZsDAg http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7GDa-L4hHHo 2:19-6:10
Dan Rather: Based on what you know, and I recognize we’re dealing with so few facts, is it possible that just a plane crash could have collapsed these buildings, or would it have required the, sort of, prior positioning of other explosives in the, uh, in the buildings? I mean, what do you think?
Jerome Hauer: No, I, uh, my sense is just the velocity of the plane and the fact that you have a plane filled with fuel hitting that building, uh, that burned, uh, the velocity of that plane, uh, certainly, uh, uh, had an impact on the structure itself, and then the fact that it burned and you had that intense heat, uh, probably weakened the structure as well, uh, and I think it, uh, was, uh, simply the, uh, the planes hitting the buildings, and, and causing the collapse.
Jerome Hauer is certainly a remarkable guest, isn't he? On the very morning of the event, he had the whole thing figured out.
The collapse was simply due to the planes hitting the buildings, just the velocity of the plane and of course the fact that it was filled with fuel, and the fact that it burned and of course you had that intense heat which must have weakened the structure ... It's incredible, of course. It's also half of the official story!
But let's get back to the attack itself. Who did it? Who could have done it? If you were watching CBS that morning, you would have heard this:
Dan Rather: What perspective can you give us? I mean, there have been these repeated reports that, well, yes, Osama Bin Laden, but some think he’s been over-emphasized as, as responsible for these kinds of events. I know many intelligence, uh, people at very high levels who say, listen, you can’t have these kinds of attacks without having some state, Iraq, Iran, Libya, Syria, somebody involved. Put that into perspective for us.
Jerome Hauer: Yeah, well I’m not sure I agree that, umm, this is necessarily state-sponsored. Umm, it, as I mentioned earlier, certainly has, umm, the, uh, fingerprints of somebody like Bin Laden.
And that, of course, is the other half of the official story.
How did Dan Rather happen to have a guest with him on the morning of 9/11 who knew the entire official story before it became public knowledge?
Jerome Hauer was introduced to CBS's viewers as a former director of NYC's OEM. Strangely, perhaps, CBS News audiences were not told he was also a managing director of the security company responsible for the twin towers. And of course no one was told to start taking Cipro -- except the White House.
Paul Bremer
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=soAGSevjumk http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2pW6WZhZrQ&feature=related“Iraq should remain on the list!”
“If we throw away the democratic freedoms and civil liberties that are at the heart of our society that’s what they are after. That’s what we can’t allow to happen”
So now he contradicts Jerome Hauer and adds it’s important not to give up civil liberties! This of course BEFORE the Anthrax scares….. Not only was the anthrax scare an excuse to strip civil liberties, it was initially alleged Iraq was responsible.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ResY3SYXa8w Isn’t it funny Paul Bremer says this stuff and goes on to be the U.S. Administrator to Iraq charged with overseeing the reconstruction of Iraq.
No it’s another coincidence…..