spooked911
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-28-11 01:04 PM
Original message |
zappaman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-28-11 04:38 PM
Response to Original message |
1. none of her advocay of 9/11 being an inside job mentioned? |
|
maybe they didn't want to speak ill of the dead?
|
spooked911
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-29-11 07:34 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. I'm sure it was something she cared about |
|
and I'm sure the NYTimes didn't want to publicize that
|
hack89
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-29-11 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. She also denied that AIDS was caused by HIV. |
LARED
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-28-11 08:01 PM
Response to Original message |
|
the times felt her "work" on 9/11 nonsense was so too far outside of her field of expertize (evolutionary biologist) hence not worth mentioning.
It is also quite possible no one even knew of her weird side interests. It's not exactly like 9.11 nonsense is even remotely news worthy in the reality based world.
So why do you think the times made no mention?
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Jul 23rd 2025, 05:09 AM
Response to Original message |