|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
liberalpragmatist
![]() |
Tue Mar-15-05 02:47 PM Original message |
Okay, I have to admit - I'm ambivalent about ANWR opposition |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beaverhausen
![]() |
Tue Mar-15-05 02:50 PM Response to Original message |
1. How do you feel about tougher rules for better mileage for cars? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalpragmatist
![]() |
Tue Mar-15-05 02:52 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. I'm for them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pbartch
![]() |
Wed Mar-16-05 11:14 AM Response to Reply #3 |
49. why aren't we using Ethinoil (sp) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberal N proud
![]() |
Tue Mar-15-05 02:50 PM Response to Original message |
2. ANWAR will only provide about 1 years supply of oil for the US |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalpragmatist
![]() |
Tue Mar-15-05 02:54 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. Not if that's the case - my question is: do we know for sure that's true? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JHBowden
![]() |
Wed Mar-16-05 09:29 AM Response to Reply #5 |
45. No, but here is what we do know. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jesus Saves
![]() |
Wed Mar-16-05 11:07 AM Response to Reply #45 |
47. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MisterLiberal
![]() |
Wed Mar-16-05 01:14 PM Response to Reply #47 |
51. Here come the Fundies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mattclearing
![]() |
Wed Mar-16-05 01:42 PM Response to Reply #45 |
56. Not to be contrarian, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberal N proud
![]() |
Tue Mar-15-05 03:01 PM Response to Reply #2 |
8. SAVE THE ARCTIC REFUGE TALKING POINTS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Tue Mar-15-05 03:57 PM Original message |
Energy Policy talking points |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Mar-16-05 10:08 PM Response to Reply #8 |
68. Deleted message |
bowens43
![]() |
Tue Mar-15-05 02:54 PM Response to Original message |
4. Boosting of local economies is not a good enough reason |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Coastie for Truth
![]() |
Tue Mar-15-05 03:11 PM Response to Reply #4 |
10. Take a look at Houma, Morgan City, etc. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MNAZ
![]() |
Tue Mar-15-05 04:15 PM Response to Reply #4 |
20. Unless this attitude changes... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bowens43
![]() |
Tue Mar-15-05 07:19 PM Response to Reply #20 |
23. No, it's not about reaching a comprimise. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MisterLiberal
![]() |
Wed Mar-16-05 01:19 PM Response to Reply #23 |
55. Nice post Bowens |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MNAZ
![]() |
Wed Mar-16-05 08:43 PM Response to Reply #23 |
65. If we draw the line where it presently is for the Dem's... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Mar-16-05 10:16 PM Response to Reply #23 |
70. Deleted message |
Blue_Roses
![]() |
Tue Mar-15-05 11:43 PM Response to Reply #20 |
35. tree huggers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MNAZ
![]() |
Wed Mar-16-05 08:38 PM Response to Reply #35 |
63. Nothing.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MisterLiberal
![]() |
Wed Mar-16-05 01:18 PM Response to Reply #20 |
53. Here we go again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MNAZ
![]() |
Wed Mar-16-05 08:41 PM Response to Reply #53 |
64. I think what you're saying is admirable... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Mar-16-05 10:12 PM Response to Reply #4 |
69. Deleted message |
flpoljunkie
![]() |
Tue Mar-15-05 02:55 PM Response to Original message |
6. Look at these slides that shows beauty of ANWR and realities of drilling |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cocoa
![]() |
Tue Mar-15-05 02:58 PM Response to Original message |
7. that's too narrow an interest |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cestpaspossible
![]() |
Tue Mar-15-05 03:07 PM Response to Original message |
9. It's a National Wildlife Refuge. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
katinmn
![]() |
Tue Mar-15-05 03:13 PM Response to Original message |
11. let's look at the root cause instead of capitalist expediency |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
doodadem
![]() |
Tue Mar-15-05 03:32 PM Response to Original message |
12. The oil companies aren't interested |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
THUNDER HANDS
![]() |
Tue Mar-15-05 03:38 PM Response to Original message |
13. fuck Alaska |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leyton
![]() |
Tue Mar-15-05 03:47 PM Response to Original message |
14. I think your concerns are completely valid. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Tue Mar-15-05 03:53 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. "haven't researched the issue" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flpoljunkie
![]() |
Tue Mar-15-05 07:24 PM Response to Reply #14 |
24. ANWR oil "drop in the bucket" for our gluttonous energy needs. Renewables |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KansDem
![]() |
Wed Mar-16-05 08:53 PM Response to Reply #14 |
67. It's called "ANWR," not "ASWR..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Tue Mar-15-05 03:50 PM Response to Original message |
15. National Energy Security - it ain't oil |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
XemaSab
![]() |
Tue Mar-15-05 03:55 PM Response to Original message |
17. There IS no local economy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lostinacause
![]() |
Tue Mar-15-05 10:18 PM Response to Reply #17 |
27. They are the people who face most of the costs and recieve most of the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
XemaSab
![]() |
Wed Mar-16-05 10:57 AM Response to Reply #27 |
46. In some ways, yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lostinacause
![]() |
Wed Mar-16-05 12:59 PM Response to Reply #46 |
50. With ANWR there is no option of relocating. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RaleighNCDUer
![]() |
Tue Mar-15-05 03:56 PM Response to Original message |
18. What makes you think that drilling ANWR would boost the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lostinacause
![]() |
Tue Mar-15-05 10:22 PM Response to Reply #18 |
28. The oil salaries for laborers in the oil industry is usially two to three |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
primavera
![]() |
Tue Mar-15-05 03:57 PM Response to Original message |
19. How about slash and burn agriculture in the Amazon? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheFarseer
![]() |
Wed Mar-16-05 02:02 PM Response to Reply #19 |
59. I thought it belonged to the government |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slor
![]() |
Tue Mar-15-05 04:36 PM Response to Original message |
21. liberal N proud says 1 year... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wiggs
![]() |
Tue Mar-15-05 05:12 PM Response to Original message |
22. 2% conservation = ANWR output over 50 years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
consciousobjector
![]() |
Tue Mar-15-05 09:10 PM Response to Original message |
25. This from Barbara Boxer (in email received today) on the real |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IDemo
![]() |
Wed Mar-16-05 08:34 AM Response to Reply #25 |
39. The precedent has already been set |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs
![]() |
Tue Mar-15-05 09:47 PM Response to Original message |
26. The last Democrat elected state-wide is Alaska also favored drilling |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marcologico
![]() |
Tue Mar-15-05 10:24 PM Response to Original message |
29. Your Alaskan friends are being bought off and lied to. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueInRed
![]() |
Tue Mar-15-05 10:25 PM Response to Original message |
30. Not ambivalent, but if we are only 1 vote away on ANWR |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
roguevalley
![]() |
Tue Mar-15-05 10:26 PM Response to Original message |
31. I live here and have for 30 years. I'm against it for these reasons:q |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalpragmatist
![]() |
Tue Mar-15-05 10:28 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. Could ANWR be turned into a national park? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Mar-16-05 08:39 AM Response to Reply #32 |
41. Deleted message |
sendero
![]() |
Tue Mar-15-05 10:34 PM Response to Original message |
33. I agree with your general outlook.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EC
![]() |
Tue Mar-15-05 11:14 PM Response to Original message |
34. Instead of spoiling more of our environment, for jobs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K8-EEE
![]() |
Wed Mar-16-05 12:00 AM Response to Original message |
36. "Local Control" = Free Ride For Polluters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MountainKeeper
![]() |
Wed Mar-16-05 12:14 AM Response to Original message |
37. Anwar |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lostnfound
![]() |
Wed Mar-16-05 03:08 AM Response to Original message |
38. Opening ANWR: bad; Opening ANWR under BUSH (?!?!!): catastrophic. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Mar-16-05 08:38 AM Response to Original message |
40. Deleted message |
Bridget Burke
![]() |
Wed Mar-16-05 08:59 AM Response to Reply #40 |
43. And fake Democrats post at DU spouting Right Wing talking points... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bunkerbuster1
![]() |
Wed Mar-16-05 08:56 AM Response to Original message |
42. Drilling in ANWR = Accepting a "former" Klansman into society. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
achtung_circus
![]() |
Wed Mar-16-05 09:16 AM Response to Reply #42 |
44. Golly, with that attitude |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Goldmund
![]() |
Wed Mar-16-05 01:19 PM Response to Reply #44 |
54. Isn't that Missouri? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Darkhawk32
![]() |
Wed Mar-16-05 02:43 PM Response to Reply #54 |
60. Yes it is. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
achtung_circus
![]() |
Wed Mar-16-05 05:11 PM Response to Reply #54 |
62. Okay, demonstrate my ignorance of American States. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jesus Saves
![]() |
Wed Mar-16-05 11:09 AM Response to Original message |
48. The last true unspoiled American wilderness |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Goldmund
![]() |
Wed Mar-16-05 01:17 PM Response to Original message |
52. The "needs of a local economy" are only a function of... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maxsolomon
![]() |
Wed Mar-16-05 01:45 PM Response to Original message |
57. dude, WHAT local economy? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
imenja
![]() |
Wed Mar-16-05 01:48 PM Response to Original message |
58. do you realize a lot of oil companies have pulled out of the effort? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nye Bevan
![]() |
Wed Mar-16-05 03:30 PM Response to Original message |
61. How about a Constitutional Amendment? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Payback Time
![]() |
Wed Mar-16-05 08:51 PM Response to Reply #61 |
66. There must be a better way to help the Alaskan economy... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spinoza
![]() |
Thu Mar-17-05 01:48 PM Response to Reply #66 |
71. Who cares about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasSissy
![]() |
Thu Mar-17-05 01:55 PM Response to Original message |
72. About 50 million acres in that area was given for oil exploration. A mere |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mhr
![]() |
Thu Mar-17-05 02:03 PM Response to Original message |
73. ANWR Holds Between 6 and 16 Billion Barrels Of Oil |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lulu
![]() |
Thu Mar-17-05 02:24 PM Response to Original message |
74. Have you ever seen an oil well site? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sun Jun 16th 2024, 12:59 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC