spindrifter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-12-05 10:18 PM
Original message |
Do you think Commander in Chief |
|
is paving the way a) for a woman president, and b) for moving a third party into a potentially dominating position? The program seems to go overboard on portraying the Pres. as a brilliant, gutsy strategist with all the trappings of family.
|
Catch22Dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-12-05 10:20 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Nah, I don't think it's anything more than a tv show (n/t) |
EST
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-12-05 10:20 PM
Response to Original message |
LittleClarkie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-12-05 10:23 PM
Response to Original message |
3. My local morning guy/wingut nearly freeper DJ thought so |
|
His fear is that it's paving the way for Hillary. He sees leftist leanings in it as well, even though there are supposed to be bi-partisan writers.
|
rwheeler31
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-12-05 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. It is a well written and intriging show. |
|
I hope it will influence some people.
|
Demi_Babe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-12-05 10:23 PM
Response to Original message |
4. I take it for what it is |
|
a TV show and I have enjoyed watching it very much. I think that it will aid in warming some folks up to a woman President. No harm!
|
napi21
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-12-05 10:26 PM
Response to Original message |
6. I think they are trying, at least part of that. |
|
Lou Dobbs had the writer of West Wing on his show. He admitted that he writes things into the show that are prompted by the political climate of the day. I suspect CIF is the same.
Even though both are TV shows, I'm sure both have some effect on the public perception.
|
Calistone
(36 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-12-05 10:27 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Bush started alienating neocons way back in 2001 - Starting with the Patriot Act, and sweeping assaults on the Constitution that the righties claim to love so much - The Libertarians have had a real opportunity to increase their power. Why havent they taken advantage of the fractiousness of both parties? Southern Conservative Dems like myself as well as disaffected neocons might be more attracted to the Libs if they actually DID anything - Besides talk about legalizing drug use that is...
|
Vickers
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-12-05 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
8. You're really trying hard, ain'tcha? |
bklyncowgirl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-13-05 06:21 AM
Response to Original message |
9. This is a political fantasy show like the West Wing. |
|
A non-partisan, can do, leader who can reach across party lines and act in the best interest of the country is most Americans' political wet dream.
Hell, a take charge leader, who's outspoken, brilliant, and well intentioned AND who has a normal family life is so far divorced from political reality that it is truly a fantasy--and the fact that the show is popular, as is West Wing, shows that there's a hunger for that sort of leader in America.
Could this pave the way for the acceptance of a woman in the White House? Sure. Does this have to be Hillary Clinton? No.
|
win_in_06
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-13-05 06:52 AM
Response to Original message |
10. While Commander in Chief is trying to pave the way for Hillary |
|
E-Ring is criticizing the Clinton Administration (Rwanda last night) and promoting the War on Terrorism.
|
Francine Frensky
(870 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-13-05 08:03 AM
Response to Original message |
11. Why are men like you so intimidated by a strong woman?? |
|
<<The program seems to go overboard on portraying the Pres. as a brilliant, gutsy strategist with all the trappings of family.>>
To me, Mac is a good strong leader, much like Bartlett was on West Wing. Did you find it "overboard" when Bartlett was brilliant??? Why does no one bother to ask that same question of all the millions of shows and movies that show men as super strong and brilliant leaders and heros????
There is so much embedded sexism in this country. We need about 50 shows like this one just to balance out how biased our entertainment industry is in its treatment of women.
|
Totally Committed
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-13-05 09:07 AM
Response to Original message |
12. I believe itis trying to portray the problems, inherently, with not |
|
Edited on Thu Oct-13-05 09:09 AM by Totally Committed
only the two Party system, but the two Parties, themselves. I think it's trying to shake America into thinking about the importance of the electoral process, and whom they vote for in the first place. It presents a scenario the ordinary American never really thinks about, and it does show that a woman can govern as POTUS effectively.
I do not, however, see a likeness between the character of the female POTUS, and Hillary at all. If anything, they're trying to help us see the wisdom of say, a Barbara Boxer as first female POTUS. Geena Davis' character does not have a huge political money-making juggernaut with political favors her husband accumulated while he was POTUS greasing the wheels behind her. She's out there alone. Big difference.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon Jun 17th 2024, 02:05 AM
Response to Original message |