|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Senator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-31-06 12:08 AM Original message |
Lieberman Tries The Smear |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tuvor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-31-06 12:09 AM Response to Original message |
1. Sounds like a republican tactic to me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sam Odom (580 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-31-06 12:11 AM Response to Original message |
2. Everyone should wait and see |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JanusAscending (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-31-06 01:35 AM Response to Reply #2 |
15. Do you even have a clue as to what you're talking about?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cronus Protagonist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-31-06 01:56 AM Response to Reply #15 |
19. I think Sam was urging caution about the flier story |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JanusAscending (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-31-06 02:09 AM Response to Reply #19 |
21. Did either you or Sam read the entire news (blog) article? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cronus Protagonist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-31-06 03:09 AM Response to Reply #21 |
23. I guess I'm a bit more cynical about stories than you are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sam Odom (580 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-31-06 03:09 AM Response to Reply #19 |
24. Correct n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GAPeace (314 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-31-06 12:12 AM Response to Original message |
3. "The Screwing of Cynthia McKinney" becomes the "Screw of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seriousstan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-31-06 12:15 AM Response to Reply #3 |
4. McKinney is going to fail because she is an embarrassment.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GAPeace (314 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-31-06 12:16 AM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Everyone's using the same word |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seriousstan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-31-06 12:27 AM Response to Reply #6 |
8. The word is used because it is the most appropriate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassWarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-31-06 01:50 AM Response to Reply #8 |
17. The word is used because it's a Republicon meme that's been planted... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
11cents (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-31-06 12:28 AM Response to Reply #6 |
9. A former congressional staffer I know .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassWarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-31-06 01:52 AM Response to Reply #9 |
18. A friend of whose cousin's accountant's aunt? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nolabels (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-31-06 02:18 AM Response to Reply #6 |
22. She is definitely in the wrong occupation then |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sam Odom (580 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-31-06 12:17 AM Response to Reply #4 |
7. agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JanusAscending (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-31-06 01:26 AM Response to Reply #7 |
14. It's the same as the Ned Lamont supporters, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JanusAscending (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-31-06 01:23 AM Response to Reply #4 |
12. OOPS!! You forgot to say , |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LowerManhattanite (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-31-06 12:40 AM Response to Reply #3 |
10. It is funny how... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skipos (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-31-06 08:53 AM Response to Reply #10 |
28. I am pro-Lamont, but not big fan of McKinney |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LowerManhattanite (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-31-06 10:02 AM Response to Reply #28 |
29. Skipos... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JanusAscending (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-31-06 12:16 AM Response to Original message |
5. We in Ct. are not going to buy it!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MarkDevin (529 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-31-06 12:44 AM Response to Reply #5 |
11. Lamont was a volunteer schoolteacher in inner-city Bridgeport. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JanusAscending (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-31-06 01:58 AM Response to Reply #11 |
20. Hi Mark!! Thanks for the backup! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LaPera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-31-06 01:26 AM Response to Original message |
13. Republicans always initiate that tactic... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
josh nelson (17 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-31-06 01:49 AM Response to Original message |
16. Predictable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
formactv (247 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-31-06 04:57 AM Response to Original message |
25. what does "on the ground" mean? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vinca (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-31-06 05:43 AM Response to Original message |
26. All that's left is the phone jamming. Sad, Joe. Real sad. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no_hypocrisy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-31-06 06:30 AM Response to Original message |
27. There could be a disconnect if Al Sharpton endorses Ned Lamont. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Totally Committed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-31-06 10:04 AM Response to Original message |
30. Anyone here surprised? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JanusAscending (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-31-06 02:17 PM Response to Reply #30 |
32. Joe must really be worried!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Totally Committed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-31-06 02:23 PM Response to Reply #32 |
33. Those robo-calls cost a TON of $$$$ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JanusAscending (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-31-06 02:39 PM Response to Reply #33 |
34. Well, we'll see if Bill and Hillary keep their word!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snowbear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-31-06 10:10 AM Response to Original message |
31. Wow.. if that's true, Lieberman has completely LOST it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Senator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 03:40 AM Response to Original message |
35. OK -- Here's the Flyer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 04:24 AM Response to Original message |
36. dirty tricks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cobalt-60 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 05:09 AM Response to Original message |
37. His Transformation is Complete |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ihelpu2see (935 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 06:32 AM Response to Original message |
38. Lieberman was on TIC AM yesterday and called Lamont supporters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnester (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 06:42 AM Response to Original message |
39. You mean he bucked the trend for Repubs to try to insinuate their opponent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat Jun 15th 2024, 04:40 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC