|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
cali
![]() |
Thu Jan-03-08 12:07 PM Original message |
I'll take you on over Obama's record on Iraq and other military |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peoli
![]() |
Thu Jan-03-08 12:08 PM Response to Original message |
1. Ted Kennedy! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer
![]() |
Thu Jan-03-08 12:10 PM Response to Original message |
2. You've got it wrong... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cameron27
![]() |
Thu Jan-03-08 12:14 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. Exactly the problem is hypocrisy, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maximusveritas
![]() |
Thu Jan-03-08 12:16 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. But the IWR was THE vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Windy
![]() |
Thu Jan-03-08 12:17 PM Response to Reply #5 |
10. Oh I see... jesus christ. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Thu Jan-03-08 12:16 PM Response to Reply #2 |
6. Well, this isn't about Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer
![]() |
Thu Jan-03-08 12:28 PM Response to Reply #6 |
20. Well it seems the reason Obama's record is usually brought up... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Colobo
![]() |
Thu Jan-03-08 12:17 PM Response to Reply #2 |
11. Elmer, do you know you got a first class, leather seat in the Obama Train? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
killbotfactory
![]() |
Thu Jan-03-08 12:10 PM Response to Original message |
3. If Edwards ver 2.0 went back in time to be in the senate again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maddiejoan
![]() |
Thu Jan-03-08 12:14 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. How do I know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lurking Dem
![]() |
Thu Jan-03-08 12:17 PM Original message |
As long as it isn't Edwards ß! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maddiejoan
![]() |
Thu Jan-03-08 12:20 PM Response to Original message |
13. hehehe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
killbotfactory
![]() |
Thu Jan-03-08 12:21 PM Response to Reply #4 |
14. Don't worry, Edwards 2.0 has never made a mistake |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
indimuse
![]() |
Thu Jan-03-08 12:17 PM Response to Original message |
8. Obama voted to confirm pro-war Robert M. Gates to be Secretary of Defense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maximusveritas
![]() |
Thu Jan-03-08 12:18 PM Response to Reply #8 |
12. Yes, and as I pointed out, all of those were unanimous votes n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Thu Jan-03-08 12:24 PM Response to Reply #8 |
15. not good enough. That's opinion about the votes and much of it's laughable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mike_c
![]() |
Thu Jan-03-08 12:17 PM Response to Original message |
9. let's see-- they both voted to continue the war-- repeatedly.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Thu Jan-03-08 12:26 PM Response to Reply #9 |
18. Simplistic black and white thinking! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf
![]() |
Thu Jan-03-08 12:25 PM Response to Original message |
16. I'm not going to paint TK as anything, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Thu Jan-03-08 12:28 PM Response to Reply #16 |
19. you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mike_c
![]() |
Thu Jan-03-08 12:33 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. if you're not interested in discourse why waste your time and ours...? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf
![]() |
Thu Jan-03-08 01:58 PM Response to Reply #19 |
22. "After last night?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bitwit1234
![]() |
Thu Jan-03-08 12:25 PM Response to Original message |
17. The link has been posted over and over and over and over |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sun Jun 16th 2024, 03:39 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC