|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
MannyGoldstein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 09:01 PM Original message |
A Market Researcher's Take On Why Hillary Won By A Little Yesterday |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
katandmoon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 09:04 PM Response to Original message |
1. And after watching it several times I'm quite certain |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 09:24 PM Response to Reply #1 |
13. Me, too. And the woman who asked the question is saying she voted for Obama. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calimary (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 09:57 PM Response to Reply #1 |
21. Welcome to DU! I agree completely. Especially if you take it in context. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bunnies (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 09:04 PM Response to Original message |
2. Of course it was. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ediacara (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 09:04 PM Response to Original message |
3. So the woman who voted for Obama was actually a Clinton plant? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 09:58 PM Response to Reply #3 |
22. now now, don't confuse them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 10:29 PM Response to Reply #3 |
25. No because she didn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Anouka (712 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-10-08 04:37 PM Response to Reply #3 |
35. I keep hearing she worked for the Clintons in the 90s |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aint_no_life_nowhere (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-10-08 05:28 PM Response to Reply #3 |
37. Wasn't the question the woman posed about Hillary's hairdo? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Flabbergasted (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 09:06 PM Response to Original message |
4. I think so too especially considering how the media went crazy over it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Honeycombe8 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 09:09 PM Response to Original message |
5. He's wrong. But he's male, so we knew he'd be wrong about that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ayeshahaqqiqa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 09:11 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. In my experience, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Honeycombe8 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 09:13 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. This is true. The men just don't have a clue about this subject. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 09:27 PM Response to Reply #5 |
17. I am a woman and that was a phony pile |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thoughtcrime1984 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-10-08 05:19 PM Response to Reply #17 |
36. Yep, phony, triangulating, posturing bullshit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Honeycombe8 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-10-08 07:57 PM Response to Reply #17 |
38. If you didn't notice that she didn't cry, then I think your judgment is invalid. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
THUNDER HANDS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 09:10 PM Response to Original message |
6. I don't think it was planned |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hedgehog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 09:22 PM Response to Reply #6 |
12. It would be interesting if someone could locate and post a video of that...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uncle Joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 09:15 PM Response to Original message |
9. Whether Clinton's emotional moment was planned or not, corporate media coverage of it sure was. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 09:25 PM Response to Reply #9 |
14. Yeah, and they were all asking if this was the END for her. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uncle Joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 09:31 PM Response to Reply #14 |
19. I viewed that whole episode as them propping her up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K Gardner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 09:27 PM Response to Reply #9 |
18. Its still ON.. still. I swear I think I'll still be seeing this replayed before every primary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OhioChick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 09:17 PM Response to Original message |
10. I Agree. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jefferson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 09:20 PM Response to Original message |
11. It was pure stagecraft. No doubt about it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 09:26 PM Response to Reply #11 |
15. I don't think it was planned, and the woman obviously was no plant. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jefferson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 09:40 PM Response to Reply #15 |
20. I am not suggesting that the questioner was a plant or that it was scripted *exactly* for Hillary... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OHdem10 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 09:26 PM Response to Original message |
16. He is helping DC try to get the egg off their face. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
juajen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 10:12 PM Response to Reply #16 |
23. Well, colleges were on break in Iowa also; so, what gives? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Auntie Bush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 10:27 PM Response to Original message |
24. Planned? Is Hillary a mind-reader? The woman who asked the question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sparkly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 10:32 PM Response to Reply #24 |
26. That's what I was thinking -- she must be quite an actress. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uncle Joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 10:56 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. Anyone can be easily fooled by the corporate media, men or women. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sparkly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 11:00 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. And you assume that your view is the correct one because.....? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uncle Joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 11:02 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. Because I don't trust the corporate media anymore and I'm speaking as |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sparkly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 11:09 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. Me neither, but I saw them as working against HRC, not for her. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uncle Joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 11:18 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. To me they've been promoting Clinton while ignoring others, not just Edwards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sparkly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 11:21 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. I guess it's an example of how two people can see the same thing in opposite ways. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StatGirl (263 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-10-08 04:34 PM Response to Reply #26 |
34. If she's such a great actress . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Essene (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 11:25 PM Response to Original message |
33. I think it was a factor, but that the pollsters just had it wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed Sep 25th 2024, 08:55 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC