|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
sjdnb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-31-08 11:47 PM Original message |
Just how 'thick' are DUers? the IWR thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Moochy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-31-08 11:48 PM Response to Original message |
1. Her Best Vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTLawGuy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-31-08 11:49 PM Response to Original message |
2. where in the bill, which you allegedly read, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1corona4u (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-31-08 11:57 PM Response to Reply #2 |
14. It's in the IWR...apparently you didn't read it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTLawGuy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-31-08 11:59 PM Response to Reply #14 |
21. you just linked to a copy of the text |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1corona4u (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 12:02 AM Response to Reply #21 |
26. It's the fricken resolution... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTLawGuy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 12:22 AM Response to Reply #26 |
59. I want it pointed out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SOS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 12:37 AM Response to Reply #26 |
71. Read the resolution carefully. There were NO conditions of any kind. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calmblueocean (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 01:06 AM Response to Reply #71 |
95. You should really give this post its own thread to remind people. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xultar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 12:52 PM Response to Reply #95 |
105. IT won't change anything because...regardless of the words they will read what they want. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemCam (911 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 02:36 PM Response to Reply #95 |
111. No...sigh...there are too many issues confronting us NOW |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AX10 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-31-08 11:49 PM Response to Original message |
3. There are a ton of left wing purists around here... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Moochy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-31-08 11:49 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Today in Iraq.. people feeling good! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-31-08 11:53 PM Response to Reply #4 |
8. What do you want from her at this point? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Moochy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-31-08 11:54 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. I want her to win the Vice Presidency |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 12:03 AM Response to Reply #11 |
28. ha ha--ok. but no, she is it to win--as is obama. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Moochy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 12:04 AM Response to Reply #28 |
30. Will she reduce the power of the imperial presidency? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 12:07 AM Response to Reply #30 |
32. She has spoken out his overuse--power grabs. She works with people, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Moochy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 12:09 AM Response to Reply #32 |
33. Same Question for Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 12:12 AM Response to Reply #33 |
41. Hillary--and i did try to check my bias. There is something about Obama and his quick rise and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Moochy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 12:14 AM Response to Reply #41 |
48. I'm not sure either way.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knight_of_the_star (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 12:13 AM Response to Reply #30 |
46. Such power is never good |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DJ13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-31-08 11:57 PM Response to Reply #3 |
16. "left wing purists" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AX10 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 12:00 AM Response to Reply #16 |
22. But Obama, you guy, wants to include all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 12:05 AM Response to Reply #16 |
31. I can't speak for that post, but for me a purist in this case is one who wants |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sfam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-31-08 11:50 PM Response to Original message |
5. Bush IS the Criminal. But Hillary was an enabler... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1corona4u (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-31-08 11:58 PM Response to Reply #5 |
17. ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTLawGuy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 12:00 AM Original message |
the IWR vote was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1corona4u (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 12:10 AM Response to Original message |
36. Possibly... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-31-08 11:50 PM Response to Original message |
6. Sorry, that train left the station years ago. Any DU'ers trying to spin in that direction |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-31-08 11:52 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. Someone prove to me that Bush needed the IWR to invade Iraq again. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTLawGuy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-31-08 11:54 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. US Constitution Article I |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knight_of_the_star (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-31-08 11:55 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. Ok next question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Moochy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-31-08 11:57 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. Yeah, others started illegal wars, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTLawGuy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-31-08 11:57 PM Response to Reply #12 |
15. Gulf of Tonkin resolution = |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knight_of_the_star (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 12:11 AM Response to Reply #15 |
38. Actually they can |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTLawGuy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 12:23 AM Response to Reply #38 |
60. it's called violating the constitution |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knight_of_the_star (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 12:29 AM Response to Reply #60 |
64. Which has been done before |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 12:47 AM Response to Reply #60 |
89. No Dem should've voted for it, but they did for political reasons. Similarily as to how... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 12:46 AM Response to Reply #15 |
87. We were still at war with Iraq, what's what Bush was arguing. For diplomatic reasons the Senate... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 12:45 AM Response to Reply #12 |
85. We're still technically at war with North Korea. The President could attack NK at any time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 12:45 AM Response to Reply #10 |
83. We were already at war with Iraq. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1corona4u (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 12:01 AM Response to Reply #7 |
25. He didn't ....he was going in anyway... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 12:43 AM Response to Reply #25 |
79. The gulf war resolutions were still in effect, he didn't need any resolution to go. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carolina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 12:13 AM Response to Reply #7 |
44. and he didn't need ANY |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 12:44 AM Response to Reply #44 |
81. Indeed he didn't. Everyone could've voted no, and practically everyone could've voted no... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sjdnb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-31-08 11:59 PM Response to Reply #6 |
18. Just because you get 'smacked down' doesn't mean you were wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Moochy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 12:00 AM Response to Reply #18 |
23. WTF?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1corona4u (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 12:13 AM Response to Reply #23 |
42. Shill? Because they don't agree with you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Moochy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 12:16 AM Response to Reply #42 |
50. To me that means |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1corona4u (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 12:39 AM Response to Reply #50 |
76. Well, sorry, it wasn't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 12:14 AM Original message |
oh my gawd--I laughted out loud when I read you subject line. BRAVO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eridani (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 12:19 AM Response to Reply #18 |
55. Bush intended the invasion from the day of his inauguration |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hell Hath No Fury (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 01:03 PM Response to Reply #18 |
107. OH MY FUCKING GOD! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Moochy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 01:28 PM Response to Reply #107 |
108. What's the opposite of a DUzy... ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hell Hath No Fury (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 01:31 PM Response to Reply #108 |
110. Whatever that award is... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knight_of_the_star (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-31-08 11:54 PM Response to Original message |
9. Excuse me but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carolina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 12:18 AM Response to Reply #9 |
54. exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-31-08 11:59 PM Response to Original message |
19. It was a VOTE for War. Have you read your constitution lately? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sjdnb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 12:00 AM Response to Reply #19 |
24. And, the IWR was NOT congress declaring war |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 12:10 AM Response to Reply #24 |
35. there sure are a lot o Du'er's who keep throwing that out. Can't seem to get past it to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1corona4u (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 12:14 AM Response to Reply #19 |
49. That's not entirely true... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beachmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-31-08 11:59 PM Response to Original message |
20. Nope. Not going to work. Kerry said it was wrong. So did Edwards. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sjdnb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 12:09 AM Response to Reply #20 |
34. Politically convenient memories/mea culpas are not what this country needs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ErnestoG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 12:13 AM Response to Reply #34 |
43. You saying Edwards wasn't honest in renouncing his war vote? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sjdnb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 12:25 AM Response to Reply #43 |
61. I don't try to 'woo' anyone .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carolina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 12:25 AM Response to Reply #34 |
62. no the Bushies knew exactly what they were doing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 12:16 AM Original message |
i am thinking in 04 is was a bit easier. Too much has happened since then. Graveling |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 12:48 PM Response to Reply #20 |
104. so does saying it was "wrong" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 12:02 AM Response to Original message |
27. My puppy knew that Bush wanted to go to war with Iraq |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 12:18 AM Response to Reply #27 |
53. well, your little puppy is so smart. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Moochy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 12:59 AM Response to Reply #53 |
93. Apparently smarter than the OP who had no clue that Bush would invade |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carolina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 12:31 AM Response to Reply #27 |
66. Exactly! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jasmine621 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 12:03 AM Response to Original message |
29. You might want to e-mail this to Rachel Madow and KO. Will help |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 12:19 AM Response to Reply #29 |
56. glad I did not watch. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Proud2BAmurkin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 12:10 AM Response to Original message |
37. you're right of course |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ErnestoG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 12:12 AM Response to Original message |
39. DUers are smart enough to see a Dem candidate with Bush's self righteous arrogant stubbornness |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Moochy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 12:44 AM Response to Reply #39 |
82. Not if these AstroTurf Garden Gnomes are to be believed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yossariant (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 12:12 AM Response to Original message |
40. Knock! Knock! Voters don't give a damn about the IRW or care much about Iraq. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ErnestoG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 12:14 AM Response to Reply #40 |
47. Knock Knock, you're WRONG! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yossariant (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 12:30 AM Response to Reply #47 |
65. Do try to keep up, please. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ErnestoG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 01:13 AM Response to Reply #65 |
98. Which means I was right the first time! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 12:16 AM Response to Reply #40 |
51. Yeah, it only costs $4000 a second... we have plenty of money to throw around... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Moochy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 12:17 AM Response to Reply #51 |
52. And nights like this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yossariant (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 12:32 AM Response to Reply #51 |
67. YAWN. See #65. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carolina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 12:35 AM Response to Reply #40 |
70. how nice for some |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yossariant (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 12:38 AM Response to Reply #70 |
75. Not some, but most. Some facts are nice; some are not nice.. It is what it is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
never_get_over_it (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 12:13 AM Response to Original message |
45. Apparently not as thick as you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sjdnb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 12:22 AM Response to Reply #45 |
58. And said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr Fate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 12:28 AM Response to Reply #58 |
63. It was not a prudent, intelligent decision to trust Bush & Co. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sjdnb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 12:34 AM Response to Reply #63 |
68. So what? Just like JE, Nadar, and Gore |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Moochy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 12:46 AM Response to Reply #68 |
86. So Why Bother Trying to Ever Do The Right Thing? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr Fate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 12:50 AM Response to Reply #68 |
91. They should have voted "no", but instead they voted "yes." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Moochy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 12:58 AM Response to Reply #91 |
92. No you didnt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr Fate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 01:02 AM Response to Reply #92 |
94. LOL! And no one could have guessed that he was a corrupt liar on a power trip. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PassingFair (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 01:16 AM Response to Reply #94 |
100. No one could have foreseen..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
never_get_over_it (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 01:10 AM Response to Reply #58 |
96. HE STOLE THE FUCKING ELECTION |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Individualist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 01:02 PM Response to Reply #58 |
106. The chimperor's character was well known around the beltway |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carolina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 12:37 AM Response to Reply #45 |
73. love your post! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr Fate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 12:20 AM Response to Original message |
57. My barber and my bartender knew it was a vote for war. So did most middle-school civics students. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sjdnb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 12:37 AM Response to Reply #57 |
72. Oh please, everyone in the 'media' was playing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Moochy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 12:43 AM Response to Reply #72 |
78. Maybe hilary should have watched less TV |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr Fate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 12:45 AM Response to Reply #72 |
84. Exactly- b/c they knew they would get their war. (ie ratings) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PassingFair (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 12:38 AM Response to Reply #57 |
74. They think we don't remember, or we weren't paying attention. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr Fate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 12:47 AM Response to Reply #74 |
88. I remember being on DU that day, and everyone predicting the coming war. We were 100% right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PassingFair (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 12:49 AM Response to Reply #88 |
90. The DLC WANTED to invade. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ErnestoG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 01:14 AM Response to Reply #90 |
99. Damn straight they did. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aint_no_life_nowhere (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 12:34 AM Response to Original message |
69. The War Powers Act allows the President to use the U.S. military for 60 days |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MontecitoDem (542 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 12:42 AM Response to Original message |
77. I thought at the time it was a vote for War, lots of us did! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SOS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 12:43 AM Response to Original message |
80. Speaking of "thick" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sjdnb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 01:12 AM Response to Reply #80 |
97. Sorry, I'm not a Bush worshipper ... he IS a criminal and DID |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aint_no_life_nowhere (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 01:28 AM Response to Reply #97 |
101. Joseph Lieberman was the chief sponsor of the Senate version of the IWR |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SOS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 12:41 PM Response to Reply #97 |
102. Bush is not a criminal in regard to the text of the AuMF. Period. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bread and Circus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 12:42 PM Response to Original message |
103. have you ever heard of a nod and a wink? because that's what Bush was doing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nimrod2005 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 01:29 PM Response to Original message |
109. You are a fool |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sjdnb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-02-08 10:30 PM Response to Original message |
112. What part of NOTHING in the resolution was to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed Sep 25th 2024, 08:00 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC