|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Onlooker
![]() |
Sat Feb-02-08 10:44 AM Original message |
Should people who won't vote for the Democratic Nominee be allowed in DU? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kdmorris
![]() |
Sat Feb-02-08 10:46 AM Response to Original message |
1. Sure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thunder rising
![]() |
Sat Feb-02-08 10:46 AM Response to Original message |
2. I will not vote for Hillary and I will vote. Protecting Dean and the party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald
![]() |
Sat Feb-02-08 10:53 AM Response to Reply #2 |
11. I am sorry. That is just silly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1corona4u
![]() |
Sat Feb-02-08 11:21 AM Response to Reply #11 |
29. That's about the 5th time he has said that.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BleedingHeartPatriot
![]() |
Sat Feb-02-08 01:33 PM Response to Reply #29 |
31. I couldn't agree more. Just saw one on another thread, The McCain folks should have their own forum |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Big Blue Marble
![]() |
Sat Feb-02-08 01:49 PM Response to Reply #11 |
41. What pray tell Emerald are those so awesome things? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald
![]() |
Sat Feb-02-08 02:42 PM Response to Reply #41 |
49. Seriously. If you have not even looked at the candidates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Big Blue Marble
![]() |
Sat Feb-02-08 03:56 PM Response to Reply #49 |
52. It may surprise you Emerald, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald
![]() |
Sat Feb-02-08 04:47 PM Response to Reply #52 |
64. that is my point, sir. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Big Blue Marble
![]() |
Sat Feb-02-08 05:01 PM Response to Reply #64 |
66. Once again Emerald, you decline to answer my question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald
![]() |
Sat Feb-02-08 05:05 PM Response to Reply #66 |
67. I decline to take your attack bait. You know as well as I the great things she has done |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Big Blue Marble
![]() |
Sat Feb-02-08 05:09 PM Response to Reply #67 |
68. When is it an attack to ask you to back up your statement? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote
![]() |
Sat Feb-02-08 04:25 PM Response to Reply #2 |
56. will you have a party to celebrate if HRC is the nominee and she loses to a repub? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cgrindley
![]() |
Sat Feb-02-08 10:47 AM Response to Original message |
3. Tombstone them (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive
![]() |
Sat Feb-02-08 10:49 AM Response to Original message |
4. DU rules are fine as they are. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LostinVA
![]() |
Sat Feb-02-08 04:37 PM Response to Reply #4 |
61. Yep -- according to the DU rules, members have to support the Democratic candidate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillyT
![]() |
Sat Feb-02-08 10:49 AM Response to Original message |
5. Their Vote Is Private, So How Will You Know ??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Onlooker
![]() |
Sat Feb-02-08 10:51 AM Response to Reply #5 |
8. Those who declare themselves now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillyT
![]() |
Sat Feb-02-08 11:05 AM Response to Reply #8 |
21. And Sometimes Those Posts Come After A Fit Of Anger... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MediaBabe
![]() |
Sat Feb-02-08 02:03 PM Response to Reply #5 |
47. Nah... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Webster Green
![]() |
Sat Feb-02-08 10:50 AM Response to Original message |
6. Hopefully a lot of them will revert to sanity as the election approaches.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BleedingHeartPatriot
![]() |
Sat Feb-02-08 10:50 AM Response to Original message |
7. It's been fascinating to see Paul and McCain lauded regularly here, as well. Why McCain inspires |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe
![]() |
Sat Feb-02-08 10:51 AM Response to Original message |
9. Sure. But they should not be allowed to use DU to lobby or campaign against the Dem candidate. NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MediaBabe
![]() |
Sat Feb-02-08 02:06 PM Response to Reply #9 |
48. I agree n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sniffa
![]() |
Sat Feb-02-08 10:51 AM Response to Original message |
10. But who will replace their donations? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SammyWinstonJack
![]() |
Sat Feb-02-08 10:53 AM Response to Original message |
12. What do you propose to do with the ones not on DU who won't for the nominee? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burythehatchet
![]() |
Sat Feb-02-08 04:29 PM Response to Reply #12 |
59. Pre-emptively block them from joining DU. That'll show'em |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
librechik
![]() |
Sat Feb-02-08 10:56 AM Response to Original message |
13. Ack! The cops are here! Hide the weed! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne
![]() |
Sat Feb-02-08 10:56 AM Response to Original message |
14. How big of a prison are you going to build for the people who disagree with you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissDeeds
![]() |
Sat Feb-02-08 04:34 PM Response to Reply #14 |
60. Ding ding ding! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnsnake
![]() |
Sat Feb-02-08 10:57 AM Response to Original message |
15. By "people" do you mean Democrats or the gazillions of Repukes who have infiltrated this place |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hell-bent
![]() |
Sat Feb-02-08 06:28 PM Response to Reply #15 |
75. I can recall someone called seventhson |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnsnake
![]() |
Sat Feb-02-08 07:05 PM Response to Reply #75 |
77. 2 posts & you've been here since 2004? At that rate you'll hit 1000 posts by the 41st Century! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MaineDem
![]() |
Sat Feb-02-08 10:57 AM Response to Original message |
16. Do you believe everyone? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DiamondJay
![]() |
Sat Feb-02-08 10:58 AM Response to Original message |
17. yes we should ban them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Big Blue Marble
![]() |
Sat Feb-02-08 01:47 PM Response to Reply #17 |
40. Banning people is not exactly the way to win them over to your side. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DiamondJay
![]() |
Sat Feb-02-08 03:39 PM Response to Reply #40 |
50. we're talking about nader the traitor not hillary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Big Blue Marble
![]() |
Sat Feb-02-08 04:02 PM Response to Reply #50 |
53. Actually, a non-stand is a stand. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad
![]() |
Sat Feb-02-08 11:02 AM Response to Original message |
18. Here's a guy who should be kicked off under your purity guidelines. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo
![]() |
Sat Feb-02-08 11:10 AM Response to Reply #18 |
24. I would tombstone Thomas Jefferson. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alexander
![]() |
Sat Feb-02-08 01:39 PM Response to Reply #24 |
37. Someone already beat you to it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad
![]() |
Sat Feb-02-08 09:16 PM Response to Reply #24 |
78. Because he's not a "real" Democrat? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dhalgren
![]() |
Sat Feb-02-08 04:17 PM Response to Reply #18 |
55. Beautiful quotations! And, as usual my friend, you are nailing it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Danger Mouse
![]() |
Sat Feb-02-08 05:25 PM Response to Reply #18 |
72. This isn't a democracy, it's a privately owned website. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Samantha
![]() |
Sat Feb-02-08 10:34 PM Response to Reply #72 |
79. All progressive thinkers are welcomed at DU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Danger Mouse
![]() |
Sun Feb-03-08 12:20 AM Response to Reply #79 |
80. I am a progressive. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chiggerbit
![]() |
Sat Feb-02-08 11:02 AM Response to Original message |
19. Wow... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Midwestern Democrat
![]() |
Sat Feb-02-08 11:02 AM Response to Original message |
20. Yes - because the presidency isn't the only race on the ballot. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Onlooker
![]() |
Sat Feb-02-08 11:08 AM Response to Original message |
22. DU already excludes many different types of people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Big Blue Marble
![]() |
Sat Feb-02-08 01:52 PM Response to Reply #22 |
42. Facism doesn't become you. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo
![]() |
Sat Feb-02-08 11:08 AM Response to Original message |
23. That's an interesting word, "should". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ulysses
![]() |
Sat Feb-02-08 01:37 PM Response to Reply #23 |
35. there's a simple way to test the hypothesis. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BooScout
![]() |
Sat Feb-02-08 11:11 AM Response to Original message |
25. If the primaries have finished..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1awake
![]() |
Sat Feb-02-08 11:19 AM Response to Original message |
26. interesting... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sarah Ibarruri
![]() |
Sat Feb-02-08 11:19 AM Response to Original message |
27. No they shouldn't because they're Republicans and this isn't a forum for Repukes nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LordJFT
![]() |
Sat Feb-02-08 11:20 AM Response to Original message |
28. NO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jocal
![]() |
Sat Feb-02-08 11:35 AM Response to Original message |
30. What's wrong with people expressing themselves? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe the Revelator
![]() |
Sat Feb-02-08 01:34 PM Response to Original message |
32. DU was built for all progressives, not just democrats. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BleedingHeartPatriot
![]() |
Sat Feb-02-08 01:35 PM Response to Reply #32 |
33. I think I'll miss you most of all... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe the Revelator
![]() |
Sat Feb-02-08 01:36 PM Response to Reply #33 |
34. Where are you going? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BleedingHeartPatriot
![]() |
Sat Feb-02-08 01:39 PM Response to Reply #34 |
36. Ha! LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alexander
![]() |
Sat Feb-02-08 01:41 PM Response to Original message |
38. Unless they change their mind before the nominee is decided, no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Prefer
![]() |
Sat Feb-02-08 01:43 PM Response to Original message |
39. Absolutely NOT! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1awake
![]() |
Sat Feb-02-08 01:56 PM Response to Reply #39 |
43. whoa... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Big Blue Marble
![]() |
Sat Feb-02-08 01:59 PM Response to Original message |
44. There are no excuses? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver
![]() |
Sat Feb-02-08 02:00 PM Response to Original message |
45. Doesn't DU ownership already have a policy in place? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf
![]() |
Sat Feb-02-08 02:03 PM Response to Original message |
46. Yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
La Lioness Priyanka
![]() |
Sat Feb-02-08 03:39 PM Response to Original message |
51. no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man
![]() |
Sat Feb-02-08 04:05 PM Response to Original message |
54. How strange. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burythehatchet
![]() |
Sat Feb-02-08 04:28 PM Response to Reply #54 |
57. New and Improved loyalty pledges; they're not just for Republicans anymore. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OBrien
![]() |
Sat Feb-02-08 04:28 PM Response to Original message |
58. no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulk
![]() |
Sat Feb-02-08 04:43 PM Response to Original message |
62. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
applegrove
![]() |
Sat Feb-02-08 04:46 PM Response to Original message |
63. DU has to have a litmus test for who should be a member. I think that it is fair to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ErnestoG
![]() |
Sat Feb-02-08 04:48 PM Response to Original message |
65. From what I'm told, they won't be after the nomination |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TriMetFan
![]() |
Sat Feb-02-08 05:15 PM Response to Original message |
69. The only way I will vote for Obama if he gets the nom. is.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tammywammy
![]() |
Sat Feb-02-08 05:19 PM Response to Original message |
70. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Danger Mouse
![]() |
Sat Feb-02-08 05:23 PM Response to Original message |
71. If they advocate for a third party candidate on DU, absolutely not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L0oniX
![]() |
Sat Feb-02-08 05:38 PM Response to Original message |
73. I support a democrat however he is not running anymore. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aint_no_life_nowhere
![]() |
Sat Feb-02-08 05:54 PM Response to Original message |
74. What about those who are more concerned with Congressional elections? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BleedingHeartPatriot
![]() |
Sat Feb-02-08 06:34 PM Response to Reply #74 |
76. If they don't promote an R or third party candidate, they should be fine. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FlyingSquirrel
![]() |
Sun Feb-03-08 12:25 AM Response to Original message |
81. We should check their party registration information |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sun Jun 16th 2024, 01:19 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC