socalover
(359 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-09-08 11:25 PM
Original message |
Why does the entire media love Hillary, and give her a pass on everything? |
|
The Clinton News Network is constantly running the "Obama Girl" video possibly pissing off white men.
The media are still talking as if Obama is trying to catch up to Hillary when he is in the lead and clearly the better candidate.
The media is still talking as if Hillary has the nomination in the bag. Maybe they know something we don't?
|
robbedvoter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-09-08 11:26 PM
Response to Original message |
neutron
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-09-08 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
5. This kind of BS is exactly why I will not vote for Obama |
|
in the unlikely event that he is candidate.
You people think you're cute twisting stuff around. Well, welcome, President McCain.
Anything but you assholes. And I do mean assholes.
|
Birthmark
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-09-08 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
9. That's sort of where I've ended up, too. |
|
I'm surprised. I really didn't have much of an opinion on Obama until recently. However, I think that one is somewhat responsible for the type of followers one attracts. And the ones attracted to Obama that I see here have completely put me off.
|
socalover
(359 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-10-08 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
15. Hillary will never beat McCain!!! |
apocalypsehow
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-10-08 12:57 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
18. "Anything but you assholes. And I do mean assholes." |
|
"Well, welcome, President McCain."
Why do I get a feeling that you would "welcome" a "President McCain" no matter what? Your statement that I quoted in my subject line is precisely what I feel about such as yourself, though I'm not a jerk and will vote for WHOEVER the Democratic nominee is.
|
Kermitt Gribble
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-09-08 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
journalist3072
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-09-08 11:26 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Can I have whatever you're having tonight? eom |
AtomicKitten
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-09-08 11:27 PM
Response to Original message |
emilyg
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-10-08 12:48 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
13. Pretty disgusting - even for you. |
AtomicKitten
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-10-08 03:55 AM
Response to Reply #13 |
19. Her timing was spectacular and I said so at the time. ;) |
|
Edited on Sun Feb-10-08 04:33 AM by AtomicKitten
|
Metric System
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-09-08 11:28 PM
Response to Original message |
4. "clearly the better candidate" |
Kermitt Gribble
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-09-08 11:32 PM
Response to Original message |
6. You're hillarious! n/t |
CreekDog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-09-08 11:33 PM
Response to Original message |
8. WTF? Have you paid any attention in the past 16 years? |
|
I'm an Obama supporter, but the media hasn't treated Hillary Clinton fairly, not even close.
|
AX10
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-10-08 12:07 AM
Response to Original message |
10. You are full of horse shit. |
|
The media has their knives out for HRC.
|
TexasObserver
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-10-08 12:18 AM
Response to Original message |
11. As a white man, I assure you we uniformly find Amber totally HOT |
|
Edited on Sun Feb-10-08 12:18 AM by TexasObserver
and don't care that she's hooked on Obama.
I assume you're implying that white male racists would be offended. We can safely assume they already support Hillary or McCain.
|
emilyg
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-10-08 12:46 AM
Response to Original message |
12. You obviously don't read much. |
Aussie leftie
(430 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-10-08 12:51 AM
Response to Original message |
14. You're dreaming, just like your candidate |
socalover
(359 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-10-08 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #14 |
17. I know, it's all a fairy tale... |
robbedvoter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-10-08 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #17 |
25. So, you guys are allowed to say "fairy tale"? It's only us branded racist if we do? |
|
Since we're at media coverage and "Gore invented the internet" type BS your campaign painted on the Clintons....
|
harun
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-10-08 12:53 AM
Response to Original message |
16. Because Hillary is a good story, and so is Bill Clinton (n/t) |
VotesForWomen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-10-08 04:57 AM
Response to Original message |
20. what 'media' are you watching? cuz that's not what i'm seeing. nt |
goodgd_yall
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-10-08 05:00 AM
Response to Original message |
21. This is a joke, right? |
jlake
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-10-08 05:02 AM
Response to Original message |
|
:crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy:
|
Political Heretic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-10-08 06:30 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Sun Feb-10-08 06:30 AM by Political Heretic
double post.
|
Political Heretic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-10-08 06:30 AM
Response to Original message |
24. god, even I don't agree with that. |
|
Even I think the media is easier on Obama, and there's a pretty obvious reason for that.
The reason why the media seems to be easier on Obama is the unfortunate reality of being a newcomer who wasn't supposed to last this long - or at all - against the long time presumptive nominee.
Even if / when Obama pulls clearly ahead, don't expect that to change much, because to the media its still the "cool" story that generates the most attention and ratings: Obama is pictured as the fresh new underdog even when that undergod status is run.
Hillary is experiencing the pain of being treated as the frontrunner - and when you've been characterized as the presumptive frontrunner for so long, and then a young upstart comes in and starts to upset that, he's STILL looked at as the underdog, and underdog always, always, always equals media STORY told in a less critical way.
It aint right, but its one of the many realities of politics that aint right. We are clearly benefiting from it and I'm happy to continue to take it for as long as we possibly can. Hopefully some of that will continue in the general with an Old vs. New matchup between McCain and Obama.
Analysis given by your friendly - and mildly reasonable - Obama supporter.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat Jun 15th 2024, 05:13 PM
Response to Original message |