|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
KellyW (539 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 01:28 PM Original message |
Iowa, New Hampshire and South Carolina broke DNC rules but were not sanctioned. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cameron27 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 01:30 PM Response to Original message |
1. Bookmarking, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 01:32 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. You know that those states received waivers from the DNC to move their contests |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MaineDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 01:35 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. You're absolutely correct! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 01:38 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. In fact, Iowa wouldn't vote to move their date until the DNC granted them the waiver |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillYourVoteBCounted (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 03:19 PM Response to Reply #6 |
21. and New Hampshire's state law has always required them to go first |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 09:06 PM Response to Reply #21 |
38. Yep! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 03:23 PM Response to Reply #2 |
24. The lack of ethics |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thoughtcrime1984 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 03:45 PM Response to Reply #24 |
29. What other cheating will these sorts call for? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 01:33 PM Response to Original message |
3. Tell the whole story - not just the one that helps your candidate. n/c |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KellyW (539 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 01:36 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Florida asked for their waiver first |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MaineDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 01:40 PM Original message |
NH and Iowa were already in the pre-window |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 01:42 PM Response to Original message |
8. They still had to go outside the rules |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 01:40 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. Then why did Florida move (or at least try NOT to move)? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KellyW (539 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 02:51 PM Response to Reply #7 |
12. No in florida the Repug Leg and gov moved the primary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 02:55 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. No No No No No.....you are not being honest. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RUMMYisFROSTED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 03:23 PM Response to Reply #14 |
25. Link? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 03:31 PM Response to Reply #25 |
27. Sorry I just make stuff up and post it. Don't need no stinking links. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RUMMYisFROSTED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 03:37 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. :-) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 09:12 PM Response to Reply #12 |
39. You're wrong on both counts... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 02:14 PM Response to Reply #5 |
10. You need to change your subject line. It's mis-leading the way it is. It makes it sound |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KellyW (539 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 02:58 PM Response to Reply #10 |
15. I think the subject line is accurate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 03:17 PM Response to Reply #15 |
18. Those early states petitioned the DNC after they were leapfrogged... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 05:26 PM Response to Reply #18 |
30. I'm with you on the credibilty thing. It's really all we have on a community posting board, and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillYourVoteBCounted (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 03:20 PM Response to Reply #5 |
23. New Hampshire has ALWAYS gone first - their election law requires it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trayfoot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 08:56 PM Response to Reply #5 |
35. One State.........One Rule! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 01:42 PM Response to Original message |
9. Here is the relevent section which specifically allows the four states to go first. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 02:20 PM Response to Original message |
11. Actually that's not true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 02:52 PM Response to Original message |
13. They got permission from the DNC. Be honest. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 03:04 PM Response to Reply #13 |
17. So rules are inviolable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Emit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 03:18 PM Response to Reply #17 |
20. We are talking about DNC rules, are we not? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 03:20 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. Yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 05:38 PM Response to Reply #22 |
31. Never going to happen in anyway that will benefit one candidate over the other. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Emit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 03:02 PM Response to Original message |
16. Not correct |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KellyW (539 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 03:18 PM Response to Reply #16 |
19. Read the last bit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 03:29 PM Response to Reply #19 |
26. Please read this I posted above. You are stubborn. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KellyW (539 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 05:55 PM Response to Reply #26 |
32. Harkin is not the Iowa Dem Party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 08:14 PM Response to Reply #32 |
33. Bottom line.....the early states got permission to move up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KellyW (539 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 09:06 PM Response to Reply #33 |
37. for a "madfloridian" you don't seem very mad |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yewberry (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 09:17 PM Response to Reply #37 |
40. If you think so, you don't know her. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 09:19 PM Response to Reply #37 |
42. Gosh, maybe because you posted this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 09:18 PM Response to Reply #32 |
41. But Harkin was speaking on behalf of the Iowa Democratic Party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Medusa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 08:54 PM Response to Original message |
34. Weren't their delegate counts halved or at least reduced? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KellyW (539 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 08:59 PM Response to Reply #34 |
36. No that's what the repugs did to their line jumpers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun Jun 16th 2024, 07:59 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC