|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Avalux
![]() |
Tue Feb-19-08 11:08 PM Original message |
Hillary loses by less in Wisconsin, therefore the negative attacks worked. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kittycat
![]() |
Tue Feb-19-08 11:09 PM Response to Original message |
1. Obama never should have won Wisc. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eowyn_of_rohan
![]() |
Wed Feb-20-08 12:15 AM Response to Reply #1 |
56. How about that? AMAZING results, brought to you by Sequoia and ES&S |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme
![]() |
Tue Feb-19-08 11:09 PM Response to Original message |
2. She's certainly got the momentum now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Tue Feb-19-08 11:11 PM Response to Reply #2 |
6. I'll call that dare and raise you two.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme
![]() |
Tue Feb-19-08 11:12 PM Response to Reply #6 |
16. Yeah, but that's better than somebody else's shit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mkultra
![]() |
Wed Feb-20-08 12:04 AM Response to Reply #16 |
53. depends on wether you think your own shit stinks or not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DJ13
![]() |
Tue Feb-19-08 11:12 PM Response to Reply #2 |
11. "She's certainly got the momentum now." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tridim
![]() |
Tue Feb-19-08 11:17 PM Response to Reply #11 |
29. She'll always have California |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thevoiceofreason
![]() |
Tue Feb-19-08 11:52 PM Response to Reply #29 |
48. And don't forget Poland |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYCGirl
![]() |
Tue Feb-19-08 11:13 PM Response to Reply #2 |
19. No, what she has now is Joementum, the opposite of momentum. NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arugula Latte
![]() |
Tue Feb-19-08 11:14 PM Response to Reply #19 |
26. Maybe it's "whoamentum" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gmudem
![]() |
Tue Feb-19-08 11:19 PM Response to Reply #2 |
31. Uh...? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CalGator
![]() |
Tue Feb-19-08 11:24 PM Response to Reply #2 |
34. Can you feel the Joementum!? -nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Tue Feb-19-08 11:10 PM Response to Original message |
3. hilary was suppose to win in Wisconsin..how |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
book_worm
![]() |
Tue Feb-19-08 11:10 PM Response to Original message |
4. Less? Most polls had Obama up by 4-5 points, one poll had Hillary up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Avalux
![]() |
Tue Feb-19-08 11:11 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. They have to spin it somehow; it's really pathetic. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
libertee
![]() |
Tue Feb-19-08 11:10 PM Response to Original message |
5. I CAN'TWAIT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kokonoe
![]() |
Tue Feb-19-08 11:11 PM Response to Original message |
8. here is the poll from CNN |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nomorewhopper
![]() |
Tue Feb-19-08 11:11 PM Response to Original message |
9. i disagree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Roland99
![]() |
Tue Feb-19-08 11:11 PM Response to Original message |
10. Dec. 11, 2007. Hillary led in WI polls 36 - 29. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Tue Feb-19-08 11:53 PM Response to Reply #10 |
51. Yes. I remember that poll. I bookmarked it, thinking that she had a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Thrill
![]() |
Tue Feb-19-08 11:12 PM Response to Original message |
12. I would love for her to keep going negative |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hill_YesWeWill
![]() |
Tue Feb-19-08 11:12 PM Response to Original message |
13. so a loss is a win now? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arugula Latte
![]() |
Tue Feb-19-08 11:16 PM Response to Reply #13 |
28. Lose is Win. War is Peace. Up is down. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
C_U_L8R
![]() |
Tue Feb-19-08 11:12 PM Response to Original message |
14. Loses by less? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KAZ
![]() |
Tue Feb-19-08 11:12 PM Response to Original message |
15. So we can keep consuming. They sell air time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Tue Feb-19-08 11:12 PM Response to Original message |
17. I wouldn't bank on that, IMO, "fairy tale." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoCalDem
![]() |
Tue Feb-19-08 11:12 PM Response to Original message |
18. Losing by 15% is LESS?.. when she was UP 20% a month ago?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eurobabe
![]() |
Tue Feb-19-08 11:13 PM Response to Original message |
20. Since when is 15% loss "losing by less?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Avalux
![]() |
Tue Feb-19-08 11:13 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. Less than the Patomac Primaries! Whatever the hell that means. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Roland99
![]() |
Tue Feb-19-08 11:18 PM Response to Reply #20 |
30. They're using Rove's math. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Tue Feb-19-08 11:13 PM Response to Original message |
21. LOL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade
![]() |
Wed Feb-20-08 12:06 AM Response to Reply #21 |
54. (He's up by 19% now.) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kaylee
![]() |
Tue Feb-19-08 11:13 PM Response to Original message |
23. I am so scared she is (and is more than willing) to destroy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Avalux
![]() |
Tue Feb-19-08 11:14 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. I'm worried about it too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quantass
![]() |
Tue Feb-19-08 11:14 PM Response to Original message |
24. BLOWOUT!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS
![]() |
Tue Feb-19-08 11:23 PM Response to Reply #24 |
32. When my dad got a colostomy, blowout was the word used by nurses when discussing the possibility... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eleny
![]() |
Tue Feb-19-08 11:15 PM Response to Original message |
27. That's a lot of lipstick on the pig |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShadowLiberal
![]() |
Tue Feb-19-08 11:24 PM Response to Original message |
33. Yeah, it's a loss for Obama considering Wisconsin's less favorable demographics to Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HeraldSquare212
![]() |
Tue Feb-19-08 11:26 PM Response to Original message |
35. Cool - go on losing by just less than 20, Hillary! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crunchy Frog
![]() |
Tue Feb-19-08 11:30 PM Response to Original message |
36. Margin is now 17 percentage points with 79% counted. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Tue Feb-19-08 11:37 PM Response to Reply #36 |
42. Agree. There must have been some kind of internal polling showing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver
![]() |
Tue Feb-19-08 11:31 PM Response to Original message |
37. Howard Fineman is often wrong. He's a slightly better version of Tweety. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Tue Feb-19-08 11:32 PM Response to Original message |
38. Howard Fineman is one of those initially bright and promising people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NMMatt
![]() |
Tue Feb-19-08 11:34 PM Response to Original message |
39. SC and now WI show that the negative attacks help Obama and turn off voters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
writes3000
![]() |
Tue Feb-19-08 11:36 PM Response to Original message |
40. CORRECTION/CLARITY, folks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
I Vote In Pittsburgh
![]() |
Tue Feb-19-08 11:36 PM Response to Original message |
41. Down 17% is success? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LadyVT
![]() |
Tue Feb-19-08 11:37 PM Response to Original message |
43. I think the weather really impacted the older people from voting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thesubstanceofdreams
![]() |
Tue Feb-19-08 11:37 PM Response to Original message |
44. She lost by 17% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skwmom
![]() |
Tue Feb-19-08 11:43 PM Response to Original message |
45. What kind of logic is that? The demographics of WI were much |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Tue Feb-19-08 11:46 PM Response to Original message |
46. With 82% of the WI vote counted, Obama's lead is increasing: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eowyn_of_rohan
![]() |
Wed Feb-20-08 12:22 AM Response to Reply #46 |
57. hmmm...ZERO votes for Edwards. I know that isn't true. What else might be a lie? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
XemaSab
![]() |
Wed Feb-20-08 12:33 AM Response to Reply #57 |
59. The NYTimes has 1% of the vote for Edwards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Wed Feb-20-08 12:36 AM Response to Reply #57 |
61. As it happens eowyn_of_rohan, I don't run the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage
![]() |
Tue Feb-19-08 11:46 PM Response to Original message |
47. By less? She did worse than the polling indicated. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart
![]() |
Wed Feb-20-08 12:26 AM Response to Reply #47 |
58. Yeah but you wait it will have a great effect in Hawaii you just wait |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal
![]() |
Tue Feb-19-08 11:53 PM Response to Original message |
49. The polls were tight all week. Obama beat the polls. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bread and Circus
![]() |
Tue Feb-19-08 11:53 PM Response to Original message |
50. Her campaign managers are a bunch of idiots. Plain and simple. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AgadorSparticus
![]() |
Wed Feb-20-08 12:10 AM Response to Reply #50 |
55. no shit. This was hers for the taking and somehow she screwed it up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GoldieAZ49
![]() |
Wed Feb-20-08 12:01 AM Response to Original message |
52. yeah ugly attacks, AFTER the debate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LordJFT
![]() |
Wed Feb-20-08 12:34 AM Response to Original message |
60. less than what? He won by more than all the polls |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Jun 15th 2024, 11:50 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC