|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
mckeown1128 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 01:23 AM Original message |
Breaking: Texas Dems warn of Clinton lawsuit that could shut down caucuses!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BringBigDogBack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 01:24 AM Response to Original message |
1. Disgusting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillYourVoteBCounted (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 01:54 AM Response to Reply #1 |
33. why only 1 recommend? Kicked and recommended, this should go on front page! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WHAT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 02:37 AM Response to Reply #33 |
45. won't recommend without proof... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 07:51 AM Response to Reply #33 |
59. The Clinton campaign officially denied the threat. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CaliforniaDreaming (36 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-01-08 12:59 AM Response to Reply #59 |
193. Their denial doesn't take away the written memo. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 09:38 AM Response to Reply #1 |
81. Obama challenged every state in which he lost--and you are complaining about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BearSquirrel2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 06:40 PM Response to Reply #81 |
161. Judging from New York precinct results ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 10:15 AM Response to Reply #1 |
107. typical--condemn before you read the entire article: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PITBOS (109 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 10:37 PM Response to Reply #1 |
188. Hillary will do ANYTHING to win. She's bad news.* |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeyondGeography (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 01:25 AM Response to Original message |
2. Last I looked, Texans hated lawyers getting in the way of anything |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 01:26 AM Response to Reply #2 |
3. Master plan Penn? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeyondGeography (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 01:27 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Sarcasm now included |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BenDavid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 01:26 AM Response to Original message |
4. unnamed sources and of course it is always HRC that is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Anti-Bush (251 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 01:29 AM Response to Reply #4 |
7. Well, last time I checked, the only one with a problem with caucuses |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BringBigDogBack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 01:31 AM Response to Reply #7 |
12. yep. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mckeown1128 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 01:29 AM Response to Reply #4 |
8. The Texas Democratic Party...isn't a reliable source... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anonymous171 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 01:30 AM Response to Reply #4 |
9. Caucuses aren't exactly Clinton's strong suit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 01:34 AM Response to Reply #4 |
16. The sun is setting...on Hillary. She did it herself to herself. Worst campaign in my lifetime, and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BringBigDogBack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 01:35 AM Response to Reply #16 |
18. me too, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jawja (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 07:51 AM Response to Reply #16 |
60. Yes, I'm in my 50s and I will |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goclark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 04:52 PM Response to Reply #60 |
152. I'm over 60 and it is the most disappointing campaign |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 08:18 PM Response to Reply #60 |
172. If she were so great this wouldn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
David Zephyr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 12:46 PM Response to Reply #16 |
130. Mark Penn and the Clintons are really taking the low roads at every opportunity now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 11:13 AM Response to Reply #4 |
119. why would Obama have incentive to do this???????? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Anti-Bush (251 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 01:28 AM Response to Original message |
6. Please tell me this isn't true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mckeown1128 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 01:30 AM Response to Reply #6 |
10. The threat of suing is probably true... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 07:52 AM Response to Reply #10 |
61. The CLinton camp officially denied the threat to sue, said no legal action needed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mckeown1128 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 08:43 AM Response to Reply #61 |
66. umm... I did read the article... and I even stated that BOTH |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 05:14 PM Response to Reply #61 |
156. The Clinton camp is as credible as the Bush White House |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 05:47 PM Response to Reply #156 |
157. I can't say I disagree with you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krkaufman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-01-08 12:43 AM Response to Reply #10 |
191. I expect it was a threat, as a trial balloon ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 10:17 AM Response to Reply #6 |
108. READ the article- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 01:30 AM Response to Original message |
11. If one actually reads the article it's both campaigns disagreeing on the rules |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mckeown1128 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 01:31 AM Response to Reply #11 |
13. that is why i posted that both campaigns have a problem with the rules. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 01:33 AM Response to Reply #13 |
14. I doubt there will be any lawsuit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillYourVoteBCounted (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 02:02 AM Response to Reply #14 |
36. McClatchy Papers are thorough and careful |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K Gardner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 09:08 AM Response to Reply #36 |
73. This is all over the Texas Papers.. Austin, Dallas,, Ft Worth, etc.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yael (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 09:35 AM Response to Reply #73 |
79. Good! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 10:11 AM Response to Reply #13 |
104. but you posted overzealous interpretations of what transpired |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BringBigDogBack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 01:37 AM Response to Reply #11 |
19. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 01:43 AM Response to Reply #19 |
26. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 07:49 AM Response to Reply #11 |
57. I wish people would read the article. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
catgirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 08:59 AM Original message |
Read THIS article! Houston Chronicle |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
loveangelc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 01:33 AM Response to Original message |
15. I hope this is heavily reported in Texas. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mckeown1128 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 01:34 AM Response to Reply #15 |
17. It should be... all the major newspapers endorsed Obama... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 01:38 AM Response to Original message |
20. The girl who can't dance claims the band can't play, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BringBigDogBack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 01:38 AM Response to Reply #20 |
22. sad, no? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 01:40 AM Response to Reply #22 |
23. Hi, BBDB. I don't know what's going on down in Texas in these |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BringBigDogBack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 01:43 AM Response to Reply #23 |
25. I was kind of thinking the same thing, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GoreVidalIsGod (58 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 01:38 AM Response to Original message |
21. Oh, nothing these people do surprise me anymore. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SeattleGirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 01:40 AM Response to Original message |
24. What I wonder is, if either Clinton or Obama have a problem with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackORoses (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 01:45 AM Response to Original message |
27. Obama pities the fool who messes with Texas!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigbrother05 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 01:47 AM Response to Original message |
28. interesting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluestateguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 01:48 AM Response to Original message |
29. Goddammit this better not be true! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ArizonaJosie (63 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 01:49 AM Response to Original message |
30. Oh God |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
City Lights (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 07:50 AM Response to Reply #30 |
58. Hiya, ArizonaJosie! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ArizonaJosie (63 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 05:03 PM Response to Reply #58 |
154. Thank you! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RiverStone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 01:51 AM Response to Original message |
31. Her motives would be so self evident... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillYourVoteBCounted (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 01:51 AM Response to Original message |
32. This must be the "Anything to Win" Hillary - Election Fraud part of Kitchen Sink |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jackson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 01:59 AM Response to Original message |
34. Good. Caucuses are a sham |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GarbagemanLB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 02:00 AM Response to Reply #34 |
35. Change the rules mid-race! Yay! If she does this, her future will rightfully be destroyed in the Dem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DesEtoiles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 02:35 AM Response to Reply #35 |
41. Hillary - ready to whine and cheat on day one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillYourVoteBCounted (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 02:59 AM Response to Reply #41 |
48. dont forget her advisor Mark Penn is with same firm that advises McCain |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Politicalboi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 08:09 PM Response to Reply #48 |
167. And The New World Order |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 10:22 AM Response to Reply #35 |
112. says both camps are involved in negotiating the rules. Read before you spout! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jefferson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 09:26 AM Response to Reply #34 |
77. Yeah. Citizens gathering together and telling others who they support and why... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillYourVoteBCounted (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 08:15 PM Response to Reply #34 |
170. Bill didn't whine about Texas rules when he ran |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EvolveOrConvolve (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 08:22 PM Response to Reply #34 |
177. Then Hillary should have challenged the caucus system before |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 02:02 AM Response to Original message |
37. First we support it. Then we understand it. Then we sue to change it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meow mix (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 02:07 AM Response to Original message |
38. wtf, is this primary getting ready to become a complete disaster? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jlake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 02:32 AM Response to Original message |
39. I support Hillary 100%. She speaks for me! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DesEtoiles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 02:36 AM Response to Reply #39 |
42. is that a joke? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DesEtoiles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 02:36 AM Response to Reply #42 |
43. Where was she when the 2000 and 2004 elections were stolen???????? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
metamars (54 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 07:43 PM Response to Reply #43 |
165. Where was she when the 2000 and 2004 elections were stolen???????? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yael (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 09:38 AM Response to Reply #39 |
82. 5 more days |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jefferson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 09:42 AM Response to Reply #39 |
84. "I had no idea how bizarre it is. We have grown men crying over it." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JustinL (439 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 02:33 AM Response to Original message |
40. what makes this especially despicable, if true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
City Lights (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 07:54 AM Response to Reply #40 |
63. So she knew about the system, but was unprepared for it because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tarheel_Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 10:48 AM Response to Reply #40 |
115. Good catch...JustinL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 08:21 PM Original message |
IF?--no --NOT true--both camps say if suits NOT until after March 4--see this: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Political Heretic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 02:37 AM Response to Original message |
44. And wow, the high level of respect I had for Hillary in 2007 and before had dwindled.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
judaspriestess (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 02:39 AM Response to Original message |
46. Funny how Texas has been so hated for delivering bush and for just being Texas |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mckeown1128 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 08:56 AM Response to Reply #46 |
67. Well, you win the award for weakest attack on Obama supporters... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillYourVoteBCounted (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 02:57 AM Response to Original message |
47. Can't win em, break the rules |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Major Hogwash (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 03:43 AM Response to Original message |
49. Oops, here's another one about it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CyberPieHole (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 03:45 AM Response to Original message |
50. Sounds good to me...she should work the legal system for all it's worth. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harun (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 07:37 AM Response to Reply #50 |
55. Like B*sh and Harris worked the legal system in 2000? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
billyoc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 08:01 AM Response to Reply #50 |
65. I agree, that whole "voting" thing is *definitely* not working out. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cui bono (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 10:27 PM Response to Reply #50 |
187. Yeah! FUCK DEMOCRACY!!! Let whoever can afford the best lawyers run the country! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 04:14 AM Response to Original message |
51. Obama is ready |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tatiana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 04:44 AM Response to Original message |
52. I suspect this is just another idea Penn and Wolfson are floating to gauge reaction. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 07:34 AM Response to Original message |
53. For cryin' out loud, desperation, thy name is Clinton? This is beyond |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 07:36 AM Response to Original message |
54. We already knew that the Clintons do not think rules apply to them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
City Lights (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 07:47 AM Response to Original message |
56. I'd think long and hard before "George Bushing" my way into the WH |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jakem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 07:52 AM Response to Reply #56 |
62. kick. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nlb (38 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 07:58 AM Response to Original message |
64. it'd be devastating for her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 08:56 AM Response to Original message |
68. Wow. The Clintons are literally going to shut down democracy if they think it won't go their way. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 09:48 AM Response to Reply #68 |
87. seems to me the article said it could be clinton or obama..so you are assuming alot! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Avalux (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 08:59 AM Response to Original message |
69. Clinton becomes more like Bush every day. This is something he and Rove would pull. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Independent-Voter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 09:00 AM Response to Reply #69 |
70. Clinton is already Bush in a Pantsuit. Who are you kidding? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K Gardner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 09:04 AM Response to Original message |
71. Clinton seeks WRITTEN AGREEMENT in advance of Texas Caucus |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WolverineDG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 08:21 PM Response to Reply #71 |
175. WTF |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pryderi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 09:06 AM Response to Original message |
72. JAMES BAKER TO REPRESENT CLINTONS!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arugula Latte (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 04:48 PM Response to Reply #72 |
150. Next they'll orchestrate a "riot" of "citizens" (aka Hillary staffers) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K Gardner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 09:10 AM Response to Original message |
74. This was just reported on MSNBC and Chuck Todd verified |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pryderi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 09:12 AM Response to Original message |
75. It's too late, Hillary. There's nothing left in you that I can live with. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jefferson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 09:24 AM Response to Original message |
76. More from TPM and politico... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 09:30 AM Response to Original message |
78. She's right -- voting is just another name for discrimination! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jefferson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 09:37 AM Response to Reply #78 |
80. Hillary: *Votes* don't count. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
City Lights (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 09:39 AM Response to Original message |
83. Good night, Hilly! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dempartisan23 (687 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 09:43 AM Response to Original message |
85. clinton is ripping us to shreds |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElsewheresDaughter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 09:44 AM Response to Original message |
86. TX is fucked up only 100 of the 200+ delegates are awarded on Tuesday the rest not until June caucus |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tammywammy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 04:34 PM Response to Reply #86 |
140. Too bad it's been set up this way for decades |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
my3boyz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 09:48 AM Response to Original message |
88. They just reported this on MSNBC...I think this could |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dempartisan23 (687 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 09:50 AM Response to Reply #88 |
89. hillary has delared war on the democrat party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
City Lights (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 09:53 AM Response to Reply #89 |
92. DemocratIC Party. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scurrilous (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 09:51 AM Response to Original message |
90. K & R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 09:51 AM Response to Original message |
91. I Applaud Her And Obama's Efforts With This. The Caucus System There Is A Disgrace. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 09:54 AM Response to Reply #91 |
93. no kidding...that system is not democratic and it is a sham! and a shame. eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 10:04 AM Response to Reply #91 |
99. Yes as it says-"both campaigns have made it clear that they might consider legal options" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mckeown1128 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 11:12 AM Response to Reply #91 |
118. It's not the argument it is the timing... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 12:16 PM Response to Reply #118 |
126. What Is Right Remains Right, Despite Timing Or Intent. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cui bono (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-01-08 12:00 AM Response to Reply #126 |
190. Them's the rules. You can't go changing them just because you see trouble ahead. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crispini (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 11:15 AM Response to Reply #91 |
120. Excuse me? We've been using it for TWENTY YEARS. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tammywammy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 04:35 PM Response to Reply #120 |
141. Thank you Crispini |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 04:31 PM Response to Reply #91 |
139. Bill Clinton won the Texas prima-caucus in '92 and '96. Hillary didn't bitch about it! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackORoses (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 04:43 PM Response to Reply #91 |
144. What do you mean her and Obama's efforts? This threat of lawsuit is all Hillary's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 04:58 PM Response to Reply #144 |
153. Please Learn How To Read. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackORoses (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 06:44 PM Response to Reply #153 |
162. wrong, one side is defending the rules as they are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire_brand (443 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 09:56 AM Response to Original message |
94. Your honor, I move that this court declare that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 10:07 AM Response to Reply #94 |
102. article says BOTH camps are considering legal options |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 11:41 AM Response to Reply #102 |
122. And it says Clinton's is the only camp that's been threatening lawsuits. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheZug (886 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 10:00 AM Response to Original message |
95. NPR: Texas system has been in place since 1972! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
suston96 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 10:00 AM Response to Original message |
96. But why isn't the real question being asked? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blogslut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 04:39 PM Response to Reply #96 |
142. Yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tammywammy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 04:43 PM Response to Reply #96 |
145. Yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ericgtr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 10:01 AM Response to Original message |
97. Just because her campaign didn't understand it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 10:06 AM Response to Reply #97 |
100. Then why does it say that BOTH camps " have made it clear that they might consider legal options" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 10:02 AM Response to Original message |
98. "both campaigns have made it clear that they might consider legal options " |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rox63 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 10:06 AM Response to Original message |
101. I guess TX won't count (according to HRC's campaign) after Tuesday |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 10:10 AM Response to Original message |
103. OP is FLAMEBAIT at best-read the entire article: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 10:19 AM Response to Reply #103 |
110. OP left out details--like this: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mckeown1128 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 11:08 AM Response to Reply #103 |
116. No flame bait... I could only put 4 paragraphs... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 10:12 AM Response to Original message |
105. They know they'll lose the caucuses. The electronic voting they can rig. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 10:18 AM Response to Reply #105 |
109. Try reading the article before you spout off. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 10:22 AM Response to Reply #109 |
111. 'Hillary Clinton raised the specter of an "imminent" lawsuit '? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 12:10 PM Response to Reply #111 |
125. overinterpretation as is the OP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 10:13 AM Response to Original message |
106. Read what the Clinton spokes person said please: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 10:25 AM Response to Reply #106 |
113. "'Clinton's campaign at several times ... raised the specter of 'challenging the process,' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 11:40 AM Response to Reply #106 |
121. It seems that more and more, we're playing "who do you believe--Clinton or everyone else?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kittycat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 10:27 AM Response to Original message |
114. Hillary For Republican Nominee!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stillrockin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 11:09 AM Response to Original message |
117. Bien joué, Hill. Like a true rethug. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
high density (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 11:43 AM Response to Original message |
123. Why wasn't the Clinton campaign fighting this stuff a year ago |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
City Lights (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 01:46 PM Response to Reply #123 |
132. She was supposed to have the nomination wrapped up on Super Tuesday. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Obamaniac (297 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 12:00 PM Response to Original message |
124. Hillary seems to want lawyers to tell us who the nominee should be... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
book_worm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 12:17 PM Response to Original message |
127. The Clinton's looking at the polls and deciding to change the rules in the 4th quarter. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoBorders (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 12:41 PM Response to Original message |
128. I really don't get why her campaign pulls this stuff |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seafan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 12:44 PM Response to Original message |
129. "...representatives of the NY senator's campaign had issued veiled threats in a telephone call ..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orsino (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 01:09 PM Response to Original message |
131. This is how machines operate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 01:58 PM Response to Original message |
133. It is absolute insanity to expect to report caucus signins on Tuesday night |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jefferson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 02:13 PM Response to Original message |
134. Method to the Clinton camp's madness - delay and disrupt the reporting of the delegate count (mydd) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mod mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 03:30 PM Response to Original message |
135. I heard an atty for the TX Dem Party on Ed Schultz say TX Dems are not happy w |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteveM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 04:24 PM Response to Original message |
136. A Ford Edsel is "complicated," but why wait til now to fix it? (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 04:28 PM Response to Original message |
137. Bush gave us Bush v. Gore. Hillary will give us Clinton v. DNC. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RBInMaine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 04:30 PM Response to Original message |
138. HRC aka "Frustrated and Desperate" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rcsl1998 (501 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 04:39 PM Response to Original message |
143. If This Is True (or believed to be), Blowback On Clinton Will Be Huge... nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 04:45 PM Response to Original message |
146. Hillary wants to prove she's a lousy lawyer as well as a lousy candidate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
adoraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 04:46 PM Response to Original message |
147. how stupid are they? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blogslut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 04:47 PM Response to Original message |
148. You know what? Go ahead and sue, Hillary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dchill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 04:47 PM Response to Original message |
149. And this will help her... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
backscatter712 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 04:48 PM Response to Original message |
151. She'd better not try this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maineman (411 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 05:06 PM Response to Original message |
155. Desperation is an ugly thing, isn't it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
butterfly77 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 05:53 PM Response to Original message |
158. The more she does things like this... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
natrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 05:53 PM Response to Original message |
159. jeez wonder why people think she's a duplicitous scumbag |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
golddigger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 06:30 PM Response to Reply #159 |
160. Self delete... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Emillereid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 06:55 PM Response to Original message |
163. These kind of tactics not only make Clinton look like a spoil sport, it may wreck the party. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
graywarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 07:04 PM Response to Original message |
164. Jeeze, has someone threatened Hillary with her life if she didn't win this election? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tmoore411 (46 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 07:44 PM Response to Original message |
166. You lose all rights to claim the msm is lying later on when you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mckeown1128 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 08:29 PM Response to Reply #166 |
181. Sounds to me like you HAVE made up your mind. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tmoore411 (46 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 10:52 PM Response to Reply #181 |
189. Then you don't know Texas very well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mckeown1128 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-01-08 08:54 AM Response to Reply #189 |
199. So, pretty much you lied about not deciding who you were going |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WolverineDG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 08:12 PM Response to Original message |
168. No wonder the Clintonistas in my county |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 08:20 PM Response to Reply #168 |
174. Know your facts before you spout off: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WolverineDG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 08:22 PM Response to Reply #174 |
176. so why was the clinton spokesperson so quoted? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
apocalypsehow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 08:14 PM Response to Original message |
169. Now there's a Rovian tactic: if you can't win with votes, try to sue your way to victory. Typical. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 08:19 PM Response to Reply #169 |
173. And it is typical of you NOT to read before you spout off!--read this: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tabasco (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 08:24 PM Response to Reply #173 |
178. Take your own advice. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 08:17 PM Response to Original message |
171. "Spokesmen for both campaigns said there were no plans to sue ahead of the March 4 election." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tabasco (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 08:25 PM Response to Reply #171 |
179. Clinton campaign in particular had warned of a lawsuit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 09:13 PM Response to Reply #179 |
184. from someone not authorized to speak. get a grip. Neither camp wants a suit before march 4 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 08:32 PM Response to Reply #171 |
182. Here--read this before you make yourself look more foolish: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stop the bleeding (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 08:25 PM Response to Original message |
180. FUCKING APPALLING |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 09:15 PM Response to Reply #180 |
185. Fricking APPALING THAT YOU CAN NOT READ!=see this: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stillcool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-01-08 01:46 AM Response to Reply #185 |
197. uh-oh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tarc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 08:57 PM Response to Original message |
183. Good, any effort undertaken to undercut the inherently undemocratic caucus system |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sloppyjoe25s (664 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 09:20 PM Response to Original message |
186. More of "Anything to Win" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CaliforniaDreaming (36 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-01-08 12:58 AM Response to Original message |
192. It's absolutely true. I've seen the memo on Daily Kos... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quantass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-01-08 01:00 AM Response to Original message |
194. Wouldn't this HURT Hilary and drop her #'s -- I know if i'm Texan i'd be pissed and vote Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jamesinca (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-01-08 01:16 AM Response to Original message |
195. agree to the rules? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stillcool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-01-08 01:22 AM Response to Original message |
196. Again? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raejeanowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-01-08 01:55 AM Response to Original message |
198. Cut It Out! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-01-08 08:57 AM Response to Reply #198 |
200. "Spokesmen for both campaigns said there were no plans to sue ahead of the March 4 election." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElsewheresDaughter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-01-08 09:03 AM Response to Original message |
201. And Obama Sued to Win His First Election...wipped out 4 opponents and ran unopposed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stillcool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-01-08 11:25 AM Response to Reply #201 |
203. I thought he challenged signatures... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imagevision (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-01-08 09:04 AM Response to Original message |
202. Billary merely prolonging defeat, this defeat is a harsh blow to both Bill and Hil...Bill Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-01-08 11:28 AM Response to Original message |
204. Another sad chapter to the many sad chapters of the worse run presidential campaign ever |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-01-08 11:30 AM Response to Original message |
205. Calling Van Helsing!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun Jun 16th 2024, 08:52 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC