|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
NJSecularist
![]() |
Sat Mar-15-08 07:43 PM Original message |
Zogby - McLame: 44%, Obama/Clinton: 39%, Nader: 5% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid
![]() |
Sat Mar-15-08 07:47 PM Response to Original message |
1. "our party's constant bickering" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJSecularist
![]() |
Sat Mar-15-08 07:49 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Exactly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo
![]() |
Sat Mar-15-08 07:48 PM Response to Original message |
2. We need to constantly fight Nader, but don't despair about the 5% figure. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rocktivity
![]() |
Sat Mar-15-08 07:51 PM Response to Original message |
4. The GOP has its nominee, the Dems do not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheCowsCameHome
![]() |
Sat Mar-15-08 07:52 PM Response to Original message |
5. 5%? Wow. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WCGreen
![]() |
Sat Mar-15-08 08:31 PM Response to Reply #5 |
21. He's not even going to get on the ballot in many states... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UALRBSofL
![]() |
Sat Mar-15-08 07:54 PM Response to Original message |
6. I don't trust these numbers at all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJSecularist
![]() |
Sat Mar-15-08 07:57 PM Response to Reply #6 |
10. It will definitely go down. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeybee12
![]() |
Sat Mar-15-08 07:54 PM Response to Original message |
7. zogby is always wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJSecularist
![]() |
Sat Mar-15-08 07:58 PM Response to Reply #7 |
11. He won't get 5%, but he could get 2% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeybee12
![]() |
Sat Mar-15-08 08:17 PM Response to Reply #11 |
16. I don't even see that this year... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Thepricebreaker
![]() |
Sat Mar-15-08 10:13 PM Response to Reply #16 |
33. I do with all the dems fighting with one another.. the republicans are now behind McCain |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Auntie Bush
![]() |
Sat Mar-15-08 07:55 PM Response to Original message |
8. Without Nader it would probably be 44 to 44. Damn his hide! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
adoraz
![]() |
Sat Mar-15-08 07:57 PM Response to Original message |
9. Is that idiot Nader really running again this year? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmahaBlueDog
![]() |
Sat Mar-15-08 08:01 PM Response to Original message |
12. Even if the numbers are to be believed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasBushwhacker
![]() |
Sat Mar-15-08 08:07 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. Nader will have a hard time getting on many state's ballots |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmahaBlueDog
![]() |
Sat Mar-15-08 08:34 PM Response to Reply #14 |
24. Whoever wins our nomination will ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earthlover
![]() |
Sat Mar-15-08 08:06 PM Response to Original message |
13. I think the visciousness of the Dem campaign is hurting both Obama and Hillary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DuaneBidoux
![]() |
Sat Mar-15-08 08:14 PM Response to Original message |
15. 5% Nader?! But then when was the last time Zogby called one right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau
![]() |
Sat Mar-15-08 08:20 PM Response to Original message |
17. I'm curious as to how McCain/Romney polls against Clinton/Obama and Obama/Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mdmc
![]() |
Sat Mar-15-08 08:20 PM Response to Original message |
18. dems answer "Nader" in hopes that the triangulators will be more |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AndyTiedye
![]() |
Sat Mar-15-08 11:54 PM Response to Reply #18 |
39. And Instead They Write off the Progressive Vote and Move Even Further to the Right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mdmc
![]() |
Sun Mar-16-08 11:04 AM Response to Reply #39 |
41. .. we continue to lose |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nitrogenica
![]() |
Sat Mar-15-08 08:28 PM Response to Original message |
19. ANd this will encourage those on the rabid right to be crazier than ever. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS
![]() |
Sat Mar-15-08 08:30 PM Response to Original message |
20. LOL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Divine Discontent
![]() |
Sat Mar-15-08 08:31 PM Response to Original message |
22. I fully blame Hillary Clinton - she is by no means as humble & graceful as John Edwards EOM |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muttocracy
![]() |
Sat Mar-15-08 08:33 PM Response to Original message |
23. problem is knowing the state-by-state effect |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmahaBlueDog
![]() |
Sat Mar-15-08 08:36 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. You're exactly right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muttocracy
![]() |
Sat Mar-15-08 08:46 PM Response to Reply #25 |
27. Nader's support last time was in NY, CA, MA, MN, IL, etc. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Divine Discontent
![]() |
Sat Mar-15-08 08:50 PM Response to Reply #23 |
28. good point, it may be inconsequential support |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muttocracy
![]() |
Sat Mar-15-08 09:43 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. and once Edwards left... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Divine Discontent
![]() |
Sat Mar-15-08 11:43 PM Response to Reply #29 |
38. true... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
loveangelc
![]() |
Sat Mar-15-08 08:37 PM Response to Original message |
26. zogby sucks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oilwellian
![]() |
Sat Mar-15-08 10:06 PM Response to Original message |
30. Hillary 2012 must be pleased n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AndyTiedye
![]() |
Sat Mar-15-08 10:12 PM Response to Original message |
31. In 2000 and 2004, We Were Way Ahead at This Point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Thepricebreaker
![]() |
Sat Mar-15-08 10:13 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. Dukakis was 17 points ahead of Ronald Reagan - take nothing for granted. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LisaL
![]() |
Sat Mar-15-08 10:15 PM Response to Reply #31 |
34. Well, dah. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
high density
![]() |
Sat Mar-15-08 10:19 PM Response to Original message |
35. Zogby is a total joke |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
New Dawn
![]() |
Sat Mar-15-08 10:24 PM Response to Original message |
36. Obama should offer Ralph Nader a cabinet position. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Doctor_J
![]() |
Sat Mar-15-08 10:26 PM Response to Original message |
37. This is nonsense. They are just setting us up to swallow another election theft |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME
![]() |
Sun Mar-16-08 12:14 AM Response to Original message |
40. Weird Thing Is, Is That From Polls I've Seen We Still Win The Electoral College, Which Is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kahuna
![]() |
Sun Mar-16-08 11:24 AM Response to Original message |
42. McCain: Thanks Hillary! I couldn't do it without you. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Jun 15th 2024, 06:33 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC