|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Bluebear
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 01:47 PM Original message |
So. How does Kantor get his reputation back? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofcool
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 01:48 PM Response to Original message |
1. Suing the jerks who circulated it and published it will be enough |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ronnykmarshall
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 01:50 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. He could start here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 01:50 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Oh, is he monitoring GDP too? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Texas Hill Country
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 02:23 PM Response to Reply #3 |
60. apparently the press is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Goblinmonger
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 02:12 PM Response to Reply #1 |
43. Good luck with that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lastliberalintexas
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 02:21 PM Response to Reply #43 |
54. Kantor is probably not a public figure though |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 02:21 PM Response to Reply #43 |
56. You Have To Prove Malice Or A Reckless Disregard For The Truth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Goblinmonger
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 02:26 PM Response to Reply #56 |
65. AND you have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 02:30 PM Response to Reply #65 |
68. Actual Damages |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Goblinmonger
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 02:32 PM Response to Reply #68 |
70. There needs to be damages |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 03:09 PM Response to Reply #70 |
91. Nope- don't have to prove monetary injury in libel cases |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lastliberalintexas
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 03:00 PM Response to Reply #65 |
83. Actually, defamation is unlike most other tort claims in that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJSecularist
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 02:12 PM Response to Reply #1 |
44. Daily Kos would be a good start. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 02:17 PM Response to Reply #1 |
51. LOL..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 02:19 PM Response to Reply #51 |
53. The Misinterpeting Part Can Be Argued |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tularetom
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 01:51 PM Response to Original message |
4. I guess he could go ask Rev. Wright about that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 01:52 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. The two situations are not the same, unfortunately. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 01:54 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. They were taken out of context. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PBS Poll-435
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 02:02 PM Response to Reply #9 |
31. In what court or law school or John Grisham movie? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 02:04 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. Uh, you should have learned this in high school, if not earlier. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PBS Poll-435
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 02:08 PM Response to Reply #32 |
37. They are not equal if they are different. Those were Wright's words |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 02:09 PM Response to Reply #37 |
38. "They are.... equal" - prodn2000 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lastliberalintexas
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 02:11 PM Response to Reply #38 |
41. That's not taken out of context, that is misquoting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 02:13 PM Original message |
"That's not... misquoting" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lastliberalintexas
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 02:15 PM Response to Original message |
46. Whatever, there is no actionable claim |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PBS Poll-435
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 02:16 PM Response to Reply #46 |
48. ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rox63
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 02:37 PM Response to Reply #41 |
72. It's actually closer to Bitter-gate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cheap_Trick
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 02:05 PM Response to Reply #7 |
35. Wright's sermons were cherry-picked |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftynyc
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 02:09 PM Response to Reply #35 |
39. It's disgusting but not libel (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 02:50 PM Response to Reply #35 |
77. Well, I voted for Edwards but whatever |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 02:17 PM Response to Reply #4 |
52. You Are Out Of Your Fucking Mind |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 02:21 PM Response to Reply #52 |
55. There is no defamation of any nature whatsoever involved. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 02:23 PM Response to Reply #55 |
61. He's Not Talking About The Shit Comment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
olkaz
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 01:51 PM Response to Original message |
5. Wow, is this professional concern trolling by the washington post? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 01:52 PM Response to Original message |
6. It looks like he has to sue the WaPo and the Sydney Morning Herald for their early 90's stories |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 01:53 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. Maybe he doesn't read the Sydney "Harold" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 02:07 PM Response to Reply #8 |
36. Maybe, maybe not. A typo doesn't change the facts, though. Thanks for the proof reading. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zachstar
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 01:54 PM Response to Reply #6 |
11. Ouch! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoCalDem
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 01:54 PM Response to Original message |
10. I'll cry myself to sleep tonight over his lost reputation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 01:54 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. Wow. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 01:57 PM Response to Reply #10 |
21. Jeez... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Buzz Clik
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 01:54 PM Response to Original message |
13. No problem. It's as easy as putting the toothpaste back in the tube. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orsino
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 01:55 PM Response to Original message |
14. He didn't have a reputation to mar. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 01:56 PM Response to Reply #14 |
17. You don't have to be "famous" to have a reputation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 02:28 PM Response to Reply #17 |
67. Exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 02:47 PM Response to Reply #67 |
76. Me too... even if only to set an example |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orsino
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 02:57 PM Response to Reply #17 |
80. They already know the story's bogus, or will very soon. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 03:09 PM Response to Reply #80 |
92. One would hope so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 01:56 PM Response to Reply #14 |
18. So only very famous people can be hurt by slander or libel? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orsino
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 02:56 PM Response to Reply #18 |
79. Not what I said at all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lastliberalintexas
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 02:13 PM Response to Reply #14 |
45. Strange, I knew who he was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 01:55 PM Response to Original message |
15. I hope they find out who did this, and Kantor sues their asses off |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SwampG8r
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 02:01 PM Response to Reply #15 |
27. yes nip it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 02:05 PM Response to Reply #27 |
34. LOL!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DearAbby
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 02:11 PM Original message |
Nip it...nip it....nip it good |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoxFan
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 01:55 PM Response to Original message |
16. He doesn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftynyc
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 02:11 PM Response to Reply #16 |
42. ONLY??!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Goblinmonger
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 02:15 PM Response to Reply #42 |
47. Yeah, right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftynyc
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 02:27 PM Response to Reply #47 |
66. They put words in his mouth and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Goblinmonger
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 02:34 PM Response to Reply #66 |
71. And the damages |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftynyc
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 02:39 PM Response to Reply #71 |
74. I see your point on that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 01:56 PM Response to Original message |
19. What reputation? ... even without the snide comments Kantor's demeanor screamed "smarmy" to me? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 01:58 PM Response to Reply #19 |
22. OK, we'll just let the whole thing stand because you think he is smarmy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 02:01 PM Response to Reply #22 |
29. When you work for HRC's campaign, IMO, you check your SHAME at the door. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dogmudgeon
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 02:10 PM Response to Reply #29 |
40. Feigned indignation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
powergirl
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 01:57 PM Response to Original message |
20. He should apologize for the "shit" statement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 01:59 PM Response to Reply #20 |
23. 'His reputation is his to protect, not ours to defend.' - very progressive. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
powergirl
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 03:48 PM Response to Reply #23 |
97. Correct |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
techtrainer
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 02:00 PM Response to Reply #20 |
26. Apologize for saying "The're Shitting at the White House"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 02:01 PM Response to Reply #26 |
30. No for this: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 01:59 PM Response to Original message |
24. Maybe they should make him explain and apologize for Sidney Blumenthal. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 01:59 PM Response to Original message |
25. If he wants people to think more highly of him... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 02:01 PM Response to Original message |
28. Back away quietly, citing not wanting to be a "distraction". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
graycem
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 02:04 PM Response to Original message |
33. How does Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
invictus
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 02:16 PM Response to Original message |
49. He is a Clinton crony. His fortunes will rise and fall with theirs. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 02:22 PM Response to Reply #49 |
59. so much for HOPE.-and UNITY Its just a ruse when you say comments like that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
izzybeans
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 02:16 PM Response to Original message |
50. Same way Wright does. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kdpeters
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 02:22 PM Response to Original message |
57. It seems an apology would be the first order of business |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Texas Hill Country
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 02:22 PM Response to Original message |
58. as he should sue them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 02:23 PM Response to Original message |
62. REC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 02:23 PM Response to Original message |
63. Good question to reflect on. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rox63
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 02:25 PM Response to Original message |
64. He should ask this question to whoever posted the video |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
damntexdem
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 02:31 PM Response to Original message |
69. Other than Kantor, who gives a damn? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 02:37 PM Response to Reply #69 |
73. People concerned with fairness? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wowimthere
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 02:39 PM Response to Original message |
75. He didn't use the N word. Let's be honest here. I saw the tape and he didn't use it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beachmom
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 02:51 PM Response to Original message |
78. Very few people know this story. Good lord, most people haven't even heard of Kantor. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 02:59 PM Response to Reply #78 |
82. Most people haven't heard of you, but I will bet something like this would upset you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beachmom
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 03:03 PM Response to Reply #82 |
84. But unlike him, I am not the type to immediately lawyer up and threaten everyone. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cliffordu
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 02:58 PM Response to Original message |
81. Suicide. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 03:06 PM Response to Reply #81 |
87. The Vince Foster solution |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cliffordu
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 03:07 PM Response to Reply #87 |
88. FOCK, LOL. Somehow I never thought of that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemsUnited
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 03:05 PM Response to Original message |
85. Oh, good lord. This was a six hour brouhaha that 99% of the population |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 03:07 PM Response to Reply #85 |
89. Indeed, but the point being is that to many people here, campaigns trump humanity |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 03:05 PM Response to Original message |
86. Maybe he can tour the media and talk about why he called IN residents shit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nichomachus
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 03:07 PM Response to Original message |
90. Well, first you'd have to establish that his reputation suffered |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pawel K
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 03:12 PM Response to Original message |
93. Except it won't turn out false. Everyone can hear it with their own 2 ears |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 03:27 PM Response to Reply #93 |
94. Let me guess, you still have a "Members Only" windbreaker :) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pawel K
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 03:46 PM Response to Reply #94 |
95. I don't get it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 03:47 PM Response to Reply #95 |
96. You're about the last person here who believes this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pawel K
![]() |
Fri May-02-08 04:09 PM Response to Reply #96 |
98. Here: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Jun 15th 2024, 11:19 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC