|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
cyclezealot
![]() |
Wed May-07-08 04:08 AM Original message |
A Kucinich solution to the Fla/ Mich dilemma. /Let polls determine delegate selection . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davidpdx
![]() |
Wed May-07-08 04:18 AM Response to Original message |
1. While that's not too bad of solution |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Apollo11
![]() |
Wed May-07-08 05:09 AM Response to Original message |
2. Dumb plan. A recipe for prolonging the pain. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cyclezealot
![]() |
Wed May-07-08 05:22 AM Response to Reply #2 |
3. since all parties seem to not want a compromise |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dansolo
![]() |
Wed May-07-08 05:42 AM Response to Original message |
4. Reduce delegate counts by 50%, and split FL 60-40, MI 50-50 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JustABozoOnThisBus
![]() |
Wed May-07-08 05:55 AM Response to Reply #4 |
5. That's a fine plan, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cyclezealot
![]() |
Wed May-07-08 05:59 AM Response to Reply #5 |
6. this prolonged ankle biting session |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JustABozoOnThisBus
![]() |
Wed May-07-08 06:10 AM Response to Reply #6 |
9. I don't see the connection ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cyclezealot
![]() |
Wed May-07-08 06:59 AM Response to Reply #9 |
12. agreed/ I dont see them whining. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver
![]() |
Wed May-07-08 06:00 AM Response to Original message |
7. Provided both states lose ALL their STATE superdelegates, fine. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cyclezealot
![]() |
Wed May-07-08 06:06 AM Response to Reply #7 |
8. One of Michigan's best hopes for retaining the next governorship |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver
![]() |
Wed May-07-08 06:22 AM Response to Reply #8 |
10. Did Bart Stupak have anything to do with the STATE party's action? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cyclezealot
![]() |
Wed May-07-08 06:52 AM Response to Reply #10 |
11. Yes he did( Sen. Levin.) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver
![]() |
Wed May-07-08 08:30 AM Response to Reply #11 |
17. I favor punishing the perps by stripping their convention vote. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cyclezealot
![]() |
Wed May-07-08 06:45 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. Anyone see today's Rasmussen poll |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver
![]() |
Wed May-07-08 06:51 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. Well, Florida is a Republican state. And Rasmussen is a Republican pollster. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cyclezealot
![]() |
Thu May-08-08 02:24 AM Response to Reply #20 |
21. being I basically accept the science of polling. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Texas Hill Country
![]() |
Thu May-08-08 10:03 AM Response to Reply #7 |
28. it is against the rules to remove SD votes IIRC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf
![]() |
Wed May-07-08 07:33 AM Response to Original message |
13. This is one of the rare times I disagree with Dennis. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem
![]() |
Wed May-07-08 07:35 AM Response to Original message |
14. Its a reasonable solution, fair too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs
![]() |
Wed May-07-08 08:06 AM Response to Original message |
15. Pretty ironic considering that all thorughout his campaign |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goclark
![]() |
Wed May-07-08 08:09 AM Response to Reply #15 |
16. I'm disappointed in Dennis, the American people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cyclezealot
![]() |
Thu May-08-08 09:31 AM Response to Reply #15 |
23. Is Pooh Pooh the correct word |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Romulox
![]() |
Wed May-07-08 08:33 AM Response to Original message |
18. Why not decide the GE based on polls then? It would be cheaper to do *that*, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron
![]() |
Thu May-08-08 02:28 AM Response to Original message |
22. They will be seated as is becuase she still can't win with them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tommy_Carcetti
![]() |
Thu May-08-08 09:42 AM Response to Original message |
24. Here's the easy solution |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dawgs
![]() |
Thu May-08-08 10:01 AM Response to Reply #24 |
27. I agree with your plan, but only if the elected votes are split in half. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut
![]() |
Thu May-08-08 09:46 AM Response to Original message |
25. If the Democratic Party regards the "penalty" as intolerable ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage
![]() |
Thu May-08-08 09:47 AM Response to Original message |
26. I kinda like DK, but this is a dumb solution. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Jun 22nd 2024, 11:24 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC