|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
sfam
![]() |
Mon May-12-08 09:53 PM Original message |
Jim Webb is the best VP candidate? So no problems with his anti-women writings? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bicentennial_baby
![]() |
Mon May-12-08 09:55 PM Response to Original message |
1. I think he'd be a disastrous VP choice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Unsane
![]() |
Mon May-12-08 11:51 PM Response to Reply #1 |
72. Needs to be either Richardson, Strickland, Rendell, Ritter, or Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Schema Thing
![]() |
Mon May-12-08 09:56 PM Response to Original message |
2. I think Clark provides everything Webb does, and more |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger
![]() |
Mon May-12-08 09:57 PM Response to Reply #2 |
7. Does Clark bring a state even more into play like Webb does in VA? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Schema Thing
![]() |
Mon May-12-08 09:59 PM Response to Reply #7 |
12. Webb might be more of a boost in VA, but they both help in that state |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sfam
![]() |
Mon May-12-08 10:02 PM Response to Reply #12 |
17. I like the boost in VA thing, but Webb will hurt us in other places...not sure Clark... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger
![]() |
Mon May-12-08 10:03 PM Response to Reply #12 |
18. I think Webb helps just as much as Clark does in southern states |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woolldog
![]() |
Mon May-12-08 09:56 PM Response to Original message |
3. he's apologized. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sfam
![]() |
Mon May-12-08 09:58 PM Response to Reply #3 |
8. Of course he doesn't hate women. That's not my point. This is something the Repubs can exploit... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woolldog
![]() |
Mon May-12-08 10:03 PM Response to Reply #8 |
19. watch this (defending himself on CNN): |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sfam
![]() |
Mon May-12-08 10:15 PM Response to Reply #19 |
30. EXACTLY. Do we really want our VP spending his time telling the MSM why he doesn't hate women? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shakespeare
![]() |
Mon May-12-08 10:30 PM Response to Reply #8 |
39. It was from 1979. I really don't think they can make an issue of it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sfam
![]() |
Mon May-12-08 10:34 PM Response to Reply #39 |
42. Wanna bet? You really don't see McCain picking a woman and then... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shakespeare
![]() |
Mon May-12-08 10:36 PM Response to Reply #42 |
45. No, I really don't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sfam
![]() |
Mon May-12-08 10:44 PM Response to Reply #45 |
49. Fair enough. If Webb gets selected, I'll hope your crystal ball is better than mine...nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bicentennial_baby
![]() |
Mon May-12-08 09:58 PM Response to Reply #3 |
10. Um...wow....just, wow.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy
![]() |
Mon May-12-08 11:51 PM Response to Reply #10 |
71. My 37 wives prove I love women too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger
![]() |
Mon May-12-08 09:56 PM Response to Original message |
4. He didnt have a women's issue in VA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sfam
![]() |
Mon May-12-08 09:57 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Bullshit. Not true. Not true at all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger
![]() |
Mon May-12-08 09:59 PM Response to Reply #6 |
11. Webb did well among women in VA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sfam
![]() |
Mon May-12-08 10:01 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. Webb barely won by less than half of 1%...This was the ONLY attack that the Repubs ran.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger
![]() |
Mon May-12-08 10:06 PM Response to Reply #14 |
23. Webb won 55 percent of the women's vote in 2006. Kerry for example won only 51% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sfam
![]() |
Mon May-12-08 10:11 PM Response to Reply #23 |
26. This was more due to the Maccaca comments...again, these ads ran non-stop...BUT AGAIN... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anonymous171
![]() |
Mon May-12-08 09:56 PM Response to Original message |
5. Ouch. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PM7nj
![]() |
Mon May-12-08 09:58 PM Response to Original message |
9. That is why I don't want him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sfam
![]() |
Mon May-12-08 09:59 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. Exactly. Someone like Sebelius would ensure a huge women's vote even among moderate repubs nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PM7nj
![]() |
Mon May-12-08 10:05 PM Response to Reply #13 |
21. I think if we don't have a woman on the ticket McCain will... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mac2
![]() |
Mon May-12-08 10:53 PM Response to Reply #13 |
53. Moderate Republicans won't vote for a woman and a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sfam
![]() |
Mon May-12-08 10:54 PM Response to Reply #53 |
54. So how did she get so popular in a blood red state again? Just wondering...nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mac2
![]() |
Mon May-12-08 11:00 PM Response to Reply #54 |
56. Maybe the Republican was a worse choice? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
patrice
![]() |
Mon May-12-08 11:57 PM Response to Reply #53 |
73. She's Pro-Choice, in trouble with the bishop for it, not supposed to go to Communion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ilsa
![]() |
Mon May-12-08 10:01 PM Response to Original message |
15. I'd like for him to keep that senate seat. I wonder if it would go |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sfam
![]() |
Mon May-12-08 10:06 PM Response to Reply #15 |
22. YES...That is my fear too. It took a crappy candidate saying Maccaca... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Mon May-12-08 10:02 PM Response to Original message |
16. Military Women Endorse Webb |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sfam
![]() |
Mon May-12-08 10:04 PM Response to Reply #16 |
20. I live in the DC area...I experienced the campaign daily...yes Webb dealt with this issue... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Mon May-12-08 10:12 PM Response to Reply #20 |
27. Everybody will have to deal with something |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sfam
![]() |
Mon May-12-08 10:13 PM Response to Reply #27 |
29. That wasn't the case in the Senate race. It was his 80s writings that caused issues...and.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Mon May-12-08 10:20 PM Response to Reply #29 |
33. The man who opened the way for women's rights in the Navy? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sfam
![]() |
Mon May-12-08 10:24 PM Response to Reply #33 |
34. You miss my point. I hold NOTHING against Webb for this...but this will be an issue the Repubs... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woolldog
![]() |
Mon May-12-08 10:07 PM Response to Reply #16 |
24. sandnsea, what do you think about Webb as VP? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Mon May-12-08 10:10 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. Other than the penis stuff in his book |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sfam
![]() |
Mon May-12-08 10:12 PM Response to Reply #25 |
28. Honestly, the attacks on his fiction writings fell on deaf ears...those went nowhere...but.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Mon May-12-08 10:16 PM Response to Reply #28 |
31. Compare Virginia to WV, KY, PA, OH |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sfam
![]() |
Mon May-12-08 10:19 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. His answer was that these things were based on actual events he saw, many times... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CaptJasHook
![]() |
Mon May-12-08 10:25 PM Response to Original message |
35. I didn't know about this stuff |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Mon May-12-08 10:27 PM Response to Reply #35 |
36. He rethought it in the 80's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sfam
![]() |
Mon May-12-08 10:27 PM Response to Reply #35 |
37. He really has rethought his position, and is doing a great job in the Senate...Let's leave him there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff
![]() |
Mon May-12-08 10:29 PM Response to Original message |
38. He's also pretty tight with the military and that worries me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sfam
![]() |
Mon May-12-08 10:33 PM Response to Reply #38 |
40. Ferraro sucked as a candidate, so did Mondale...this is not a good reason to stay away from women... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mac2
![]() |
Mon May-12-08 10:36 PM Response to Reply #40 |
44. The fact that they picked Ferraro before investigating her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff
![]() |
Tue May-13-08 12:01 AM Response to Reply #44 |
74. I think they were both good candidates, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mac2
![]() |
Mon May-12-08 10:33 PM Response to Original message |
41. Women in the military are being rapped and abused. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sfam
![]() |
Mon May-12-08 10:35 PM Response to Reply #41 |
43. I just would rather our VP augment Obama's strengths instead of sending us down a rathole... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mac2
![]() |
Mon May-12-08 10:39 PM Response to Reply #43 |
46. I don't like counting VPs before the primary is over. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
totodeinhere
![]() |
Mon May-12-08 10:41 PM Response to Original message |
47. I can't think of one instance in history when a VP candidate caused the ticket to lose. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sfam
![]() |
Mon May-12-08 10:43 PM Response to Reply #47 |
48. Fair point. Quale did not do Bush any favors...nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mac2
![]() |
Mon May-12-08 10:51 PM Response to Reply #48 |
52. People didn't know much about Quale. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mac2
![]() |
Mon May-12-08 10:50 PM Response to Reply #47 |
51. Here's one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
totodeinhere
![]() |
Mon May-12-08 10:55 PM Response to Reply #51 |
55. No, Lieberman didn't cost Gore the election. Gore won and the Repukes stole it from him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mac2
![]() |
Mon May-12-08 11:04 PM Response to Reply #55 |
58. There is no reason why it had to be so close. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
totodeinhere
![]() |
Tue May-13-08 07:47 AM Response to Reply #58 |
77. That's not the point. Lieberman may not have been popular with all Dems, but... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mac2
![]() |
Tue May-13-08 08:10 PM Response to Reply #77 |
78. I'll say it again. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
totodeinhere
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 10:34 AM Response to Reply #78 |
80. I'll say it again. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mac2
![]() |
Tue May-13-08 08:11 PM Response to Reply #77 |
79. Delete |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rove karl rove
![]() |
Mon May-12-08 10:44 PM Response to Original message |
50. Jim Webb, bad choice for Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
patrice
![]() |
Mon May-12-08 11:02 PM Response to Original message |
57. Webb's a good guy, but he needs to hold that Senate seat for at least one term |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mac2
![]() |
Mon May-12-08 11:29 PM Response to Reply #57 |
59. Good to know. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
patrice
![]() |
Mon May-12-08 11:38 PM Response to Reply #59 |
60. Nothing secret about PNAC. He didn't sign their original plan for Iraq in '97 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff
![]() |
Mon May-12-08 11:40 PM Response to Reply #60 |
63. That rules him out ENTIRELY. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mac2
![]() |
Mon May-12-08 11:41 PM Response to Reply #60 |
64. Those secret groups have plans that we don't agree with. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff
![]() |
Mon May-12-08 11:38 PM Response to Reply #57 |
61. God help us another PNAC mole. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mac2
![]() |
Mon May-12-08 11:43 PM Response to Reply #61 |
67. A patriot questions his government leaders. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff
![]() |
Mon May-12-08 11:46 PM Response to Reply #67 |
69. I'm not being sarcastic. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ButterflyBlood
![]() |
Mon May-12-08 11:40 PM Response to Original message |
62. Wow. This is trash that was spewed on Free Republic in 2006 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mac2
![]() |
Mon May-12-08 11:41 PM Response to Reply #62 |
65. Google it and see it is not a Republican lie. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sfam
![]() |
Mon May-12-08 11:43 PM Response to Reply #62 |
66. Try rereading the OP. This is NOT about whether Webb believes this crap. This is about... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mac2
![]() |
Mon May-12-08 11:46 PM Response to Reply #66 |
68. These secret elite organizations exist. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sfam
![]() |
Mon May-12-08 11:48 PM Response to Reply #68 |
70. Just to be clear, my OP has nothing to do with secret elite organizations...I was discussing... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muryan
![]() |
Tue May-13-08 12:03 AM Response to Original message |
75. I haven't paid much attention to the Obama/Vp threads lately |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
theboss
![]() |
Tue May-13-08 12:05 AM Response to Original message |
76. I love Webb as a Senator, but he is crazy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beachmom
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 10:38 AM Response to Original message |
81. That is a good point. I also think we need his Senate seat. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Texas Hill Country
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 10:40 AM Response to Original message |
82. sexism is ok, racism is not - dont you love the double standard? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sun Jun 16th 2024, 02:06 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC