|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Cant trust em
![]() |
Tue May-13-08 06:16 PM Original message |
Are caucuses useful for determining our nominee? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PBS Poll-435
![]() |
Tue May-13-08 06:17 PM Response to Original message |
1. No. One Man = One Vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tishaLA
![]() |
Tue May-13-08 06:29 PM Response to Reply #1 |
9. Federalist #10's discussion of "faction" has nothing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PBS Poll-435
![]() |
Tue May-13-08 06:35 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. Faction = A Clique or Subgroup |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tishaLA
![]() |
Tue May-13-08 06:48 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. You might want to brush up on Federalist #10 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PBS Poll-435
![]() |
Tue May-13-08 06:56 PM Response to Reply #12 |
16. Fed #10 talks about subgroups. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tishaLA
![]() |
Tue May-13-08 07:08 PM Response to Reply #16 |
21. so you're arguing... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
juajen
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 01:18 PM Response to Reply #12 |
73. Well, they are male. This feminist doesn't want to rearrange History, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crimsonblue
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 10:04 PM Response to Reply #11 |
118. You're pretty obtuse if you think caucuses are a faction... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 10:10 PM Response to Reply #118 |
119. It can't possibly cover all employees |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crimsonblue
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 10:14 PM Response to Reply #119 |
121. ok satan's advocate... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 10:18 PM Response to Reply #121 |
124. I'm questioning |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hfojvt
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 03:08 AM Response to Reply #121 |
135. we had record turn-out in this year's caucus |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
New Dawn
![]() |
Tue May-13-08 06:58 PM Response to Reply #1 |
18. They also supported slavery and opposed term limits for president. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Tue May-13-08 06:17 PM Response to Original message |
2. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui
![]() |
Tue May-13-08 06:18 PM Response to Original message |
3. I like them mixed in with Primaries. They do not inherently favor one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
juajen
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 01:21 PM Response to Reply #3 |
74. Bullshit. They are rife with bullies. So the stronger people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seriousstan
![]() |
Tue May-13-08 06:26 PM Response to Original message |
4. No, it is closer to mob rule than a ballot box. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kwenu
![]() |
Tue May-13-08 06:27 PM Response to Original message |
5. Exactly how does the caucus system favor one candidate over the other? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cant trust em
![]() |
Tue May-13-08 06:29 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. That's the point of this thread. I hope we get some good responses. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 09:44 AM Response to Reply #5 |
37. Well it's obvious that they dont' reflect the real will of the people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cant trust em
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 11:07 AM Response to Reply #37 |
39. participating in a democracy is much easier when it only takes two minutes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 01:17 PM Response to Reply #39 |
72. sure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cant trust em
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 04:05 PM Response to Reply #72 |
90. You certanily make a good point, both systems have their benefits |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MGKrebs
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 05:44 PM Response to Reply #90 |
92. ""getting together with your community" is not the distinguishing characteristic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cant trust em
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 10:29 PM Response to Reply #92 |
129. I think we're discussing this somewhere downthread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
juajen
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 01:49 PM Response to Reply #5 |
77. I'll explain. It is said that Hillary's greatest support is little old ladies, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Texas Hill Country
![]() |
Tue May-13-08 06:27 PM Response to Original message |
6. no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bucky
![]() |
Tue May-13-08 06:28 PM Response to Original message |
7. A system in which those who get involved and participate matter more than the apathetic? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
juajen
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 02:23 PM Response to Reply #7 |
80. Hey dude, who the Hell are you calling apathetic? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 10:13 PM Response to Reply #7 |
120. Well the superdelegates are the most involved |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zynx
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 03:10 AM Response to Reply #7 |
136. The level of commitment should not hold the balance of power. If it did we would never be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Secret_Society
![]() |
Tue May-13-08 06:31 PM Response to Original message |
10. No...People shouldn't have to be trained how to vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemVet
![]() |
Tue May-13-08 06:51 PM Response to Original message |
13. Absolutely not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LisaM
![]() |
Tue May-13-08 06:54 PM Response to Original message |
14. I don't like them for a variety of reasons. I've been to 3. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
New Dawn
![]() |
Tue May-13-08 06:55 PM Response to Original message |
15. Yes, they're great. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
juajen
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 02:31 PM Response to Reply #15 |
81. You're a riot and obviously have not read this thread. NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigwillq
![]() |
Tue May-13-08 06:56 PM Response to Original message |
17. Maybe I don't understand the caucus system |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
justgamma
![]() |
Tue May-13-08 07:20 PM Response to Reply #17 |
24. You don't have to chose another candidate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigwillq
![]() |
Tue May-13-08 07:21 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. So my vote doesn't really count |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thoughtcrime1984
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 02:38 PM Response to Reply #25 |
84. Your vote wouldn't count in primaries either |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 01:15 PM Response to Reply #24 |
70. But states with viability tests don't allow you to vote for a non viable candidate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Undercurrent
![]() |
Tue May-13-08 07:03 PM Response to Original message |
19. I have loved going to my caucuses! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oak2004
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 09:42 AM Response to Reply #19 |
36. Exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
juajen
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 02:35 PM Response to Reply #36 |
82. Do you vote for the Pres. nominee at those town hall meetings? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oak2004
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 06:14 PM Response to Reply #82 |
93. No, we decide who will be our local officials, local policies, budgets, etc. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MGKrebs
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 06:48 PM Response to Reply #36 |
98. What could possibly be more democratic than every single Democrat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MGKrebs
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 06:46 PM Response to Reply #19 |
97. You should try your local party meetings. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MGKrebs
![]() |
Tue May-13-08 07:03 PM Response to Original message |
20. Voting in private is generally considered a good thing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Exilednight
![]() |
Tue May-13-08 07:34 PM Response to Reply #20 |
28. People will always complain about them, but here's the truth .......... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MGKrebs
![]() |
Tue May-13-08 08:08 PM Response to Reply #28 |
30. I have no idea what you are talking about. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Exilednight
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 09:03 AM Response to Reply #30 |
34. 1972 was the first nation wide primary, in the 1968 election only 13 states ........ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MGKrebs
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 12:51 PM Response to Reply #34 |
59. So NONE of the grassroots organizing that goes into GOTV |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MGKrebs
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 06:44 PM Response to Reply #34 |
96. I've been reading up on this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Justitia
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 08:17 PM Response to Reply #96 |
100. So what? We didn't even used to pick our own nominees. Caucuses are open to all now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MGKrebs
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 09:07 PM Response to Reply #100 |
105. Caucuses are open to all who can spend the time and are willing to expose themselves |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Justitia
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 09:30 PM Response to Reply #105 |
109. PA (where Hillary won) does not have early voting. If you can't vote at a certain time, tough. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MGKrebs
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 09:45 PM Response to Reply #109 |
112. Please clarify. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Justitia
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 09:52 PM Response to Reply #112 |
115. PA: 8 - 7, election day only, no early voting. TX has both a primary & caucus. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 10:17 PM Response to Reply #115 |
122. Why can't you discuss this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MGKrebs
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 10:32 PM Response to Reply #115 |
130. OK, you are saying that the primary is the system that offers the most access, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Justitia
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 02:57 AM Response to Reply #130 |
134. So I guess you haven't ever participated in a caucus & I guess you didn't like my explanation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart
![]() |
Tue May-13-08 07:09 PM Response to Original message |
22. Damn useful for Obama. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Justitia
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 09:46 AM Response to Reply #22 |
38. As they were for Bill Clinton - TWICE. Only the losers bitch about them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MGKrebs
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 12:56 PM Response to Reply #38 |
62. Ah, "the ends justifies the means" argument. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Justitia
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 02:22 PM Response to Reply #62 |
79. Sorry, caucuses have been a tradition in Our Party long before Hillary Clinton couldn't win them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MGKrebs
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 06:50 PM Response to Reply #79 |
99. See post #96. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 10:21 PM Response to Reply #79 |
125. Why not discuss the topic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
musicblind
![]() |
Tue May-13-08 07:19 PM Response to Original message |
23. no, Caucuses are not good in my opinion. Nor are Superdelegates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemBones DemBones
![]() |
Tue May-13-08 07:24 PM Response to Original message |
26. No, and for the reasons you listed. You forgot to mention |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
justgamma
![]() |
Tue May-13-08 07:29 PM Response to Original message |
27. I have a question for those who have primaries. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MGKrebs
![]() |
Tue May-13-08 08:12 PM Response to Reply #27 |
31. Discussion isn't the issue. It's voting in private. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
justgamma
![]() |
Tue May-13-08 10:43 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. I understand you want your vote private. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cant trust em
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 11:11 AM Response to Reply #32 |
41. It doesn't happen. You wait in line and they give you your ballot and you mark it up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MGKrebs
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 01:01 PM Response to Reply #41 |
66. Only if you consider the actual moment of voting as the only eligible |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cant trust em
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 03:03 PM Response to Reply #66 |
86. Right. But having caucuses on a specific day that gets major advertisement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MGKrebs
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 09:11 PM Response to Reply #32 |
106. Let me ask you a question... How do you elect your senators and reps? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cant trust em
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 11:17 AM Response to Reply #31 |
42. I think we're coming to a good consensus here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 11:43 AM Response to Reply #27 |
44. All Irrelevant Side Effects That Have Not An Iota To Do With Choosing The Best Nominee For The Party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bettie
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 12:41 PM Response to Reply #27 |
57. That is the great thing about the caucuses |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bill McBlueState
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 12:56 PM Response to Reply #27 |
63. there are state and local conventions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 01:13 PM Response to Reply #27 |
69. You can do all that at regular party meetings which is where that stuff is usually done. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zynx
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 03:13 AM Response to Reply #27 |
137. Most people are far too busy to be involved in all of that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Undercurrent
![]() |
Tue May-13-08 08:00 PM Response to Original message |
29. I'd like to second justgamma's points. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
newmajority
![]() |
Tue May-13-08 10:50 PM Response to Original message |
33. Until we can guarantee that a primary ballot is legitimate (i.e.no electro-fraud machines) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 10:23 PM Response to Reply #33 |
126. Nonsense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crankychatter
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 09:06 AM Response to Original message |
35. absolutely - 100 people vote and select delegates proportionately |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulk
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 09:06 PM Response to Reply #35 |
104. "Until Clinton started losing no one ever cared..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RoadRage
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 11:11 AM Response to Original message |
40. Frankly - No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 11:41 AM Response to Original message |
43. No. They're Worthless, Completely Unrepresentative, Skewed And Should Be Totally Done Away With |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
otohara
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 11:48 AM Response to Reply #43 |
45. And If A State Doesn't Have The Bucks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulk
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 12:19 PM Response to Reply #45 |
47. why did our state have a caucus instead of a primary this time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
otohara
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 02:03 PM Response to Reply #47 |
78. Money & Low Turnout |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulk
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 02:35 PM Response to Reply #78 |
83. what I don't understand is - if primaries are still being held |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
otohara
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 02:50 PM Response to Reply #83 |
85. After 2008 Turnout - Primary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulk
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 12:15 PM Response to Original message |
46. I don't like caucuses |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cant trust em
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 12:27 PM Response to Reply #46 |
51. You make some good points. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 12:20 PM Response to Original message |
48. Hillary said that Iowa caucus was great! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mystieus
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 12:21 PM Response to Original message |
49. Caucuses were fine until Obama got into the race. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stillcool
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 09:30 PM Response to Reply #49 |
110. Ain't that the truth... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 10:25 PM Response to Reply #110 |
128. No, it's not the truth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stillcool
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 10:44 PM Response to Reply #128 |
131. I understand the argument |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 12:23 PM Response to Original message |
50. First, some definitions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MGKrebs
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 08:58 PM Response to Reply #50 |
103. I disagree with your definitions, and who "sponsors" (or counts the votes) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
indimuse
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 12:27 PM Response to Original message |
52. 38,571 caucuse Democrats Vs. 93,757 Democrats in the Nebraska preference primary? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cant trust em
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 12:32 PM Response to Reply #52 |
53. Good points. Would you mind giving this a rec so we can put this on the greatest page? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
indimuse
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 12:59 PM Response to Reply #52 |
65. I already did! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cant trust em
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 03:20 PM Response to Reply #65 |
89. I'm proud of DU with this thread. It's been remarkably flame-free. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marrah_G
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 12:36 PM Response to Original message |
54. I dislike them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MGKrebs
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 01:32 PM Response to Reply #54 |
76. I wouldn't like it, but I can play that game. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lastliberalintexas
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 12:36 PM Response to Original message |
55. Not really |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bettie
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 12:36 PM Response to Original message |
56. I live in Iowa now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bill McBlueState
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 12:48 PM Response to Original message |
58. Construct a system that preserves the best elements of primaries & caucuses |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cant trust em
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 12:55 PM Response to Reply #58 |
60. How do you write italics in your post? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bill McBlueState
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 01:02 PM Response to Reply #60 |
67. how to do it: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cant trust em
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 03:07 PM Response to Reply #67 |
88. Thanks for the tip. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MGKrebs
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 09:17 PM Response to Reply #58 |
107. I would introduce Instant Runoff Voting to the process too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PassingFair
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 10:24 PM Response to Reply #58 |
127. "Fire House" Caucus.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RichardRay
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 12:56 PM Response to Original message |
61. The Wyoming 'Caucus' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheDoorbellRang
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 12:58 PM Response to Original message |
64. I think it would be more interesting to have a poll |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheDoorbellRang
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 01:12 PM Response to Reply #64 |
68. I just started a poll on this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dinger
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 01:15 PM Response to Original message |
71. I Agree On #2 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cant trust em
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 03:04 PM Response to Reply #71 |
87. States choose what process they want for themselves. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RichardRay
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 08:37 PM Response to Reply #71 |
102. Cost is one issue. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
theboss
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 01:23 PM Response to Original message |
75. I think the first thing is to figure out exactly what our objective is with the nomination process |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VotesForWomen
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 04:18 PM Response to Original message |
91. they suck just like a 6 month long primary. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sniffa
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 06:14 PM Response to Original message |
94. Yes, they are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
galledgoblin
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 06:16 PM Response to Original message |
95. no, makes things much too complicated (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Condem
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 08:33 PM Response to Original message |
101. I can't believe that no one has mentioned Diebold |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MGKrebs
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 09:23 PM Response to Reply #101 |
108. And there is NO ONE at the caucuses trying to manipulate the voting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Condem
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 09:45 PM Response to Reply #108 |
113. Have you been to one, MG? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MGKrebs
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 10:18 PM Response to Reply #113 |
123. You mean one for the presidential delegate selection? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zynx
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 03:15 AM Response to Reply #101 |
138. Quite frankly, against the undemocratic nature of caucuses, I'm willing to take the risk. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Seabiscuit
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 09:32 PM Response to Original message |
111. They're an undemocratic farce, an engine driven by big money. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 09:50 PM Response to Reply #111 |
114. Deleted message |
Condem
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 09:55 PM Response to Original message |
116. I'll bet you 90% who posted here hasn't been to one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quakerboy
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 09:57 PM Response to Original message |
117. On #2 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_State_Elitist
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 10:50 PM Response to Original message |
132. Nah |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog
![]() |
Wed May-14-08 10:59 PM Response to Original message |
133. they are more useful than having superdelegates decide |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Wed Jun 19th 2024, 03:24 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC