jenmito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-13-08 08:33 PM
Original message |
Thanks, KO, for bringing up the TRUTH lacking in Hillary's speech. |
|
He mentioned that it is NOT a close race as she claimed. He mentioned that Hillary said that MI wouldn't count for anything. He mentioned the NUMBERS. Thanks, Keith!
|
blonndee
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-13-08 08:33 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Not just Keith. Tweety too. |
jenmito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-13-08 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. Well, he kind of tried to excuse some of her claims about the closeness of the race. |
blonndee
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-13-08 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
6. Really? I didn't hear it that way. |
|
I was actually kind of surprised that Chris was being so frank about the moving goalposts and how it's not "her opinion versus others' opinions" like she and her surrogates try to make it seem, but that it's her "version of reality" versus the numbers and facts.
But I could have missed something!
|
jenmito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-13-08 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
11. He switches on a dime. He said both things... |
book_worm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-13-08 08:35 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Watch several more Super Delegates come out tomorrow for Obama |
|
to try and end this thing. The party will end this if she won't.
|
jenmito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-13-08 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. I bet you're right. And I heard he's going to announce huge numbers from April fundraising. |
|
Edited on Tue May-13-08 08:37 PM by jenmito
That's good, too.
|
panAmerican
(864 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-13-08 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
17. Norah O'Donnell: "Astronomical" fundraising numbers |
jenmito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-13-08 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
22. Thanks. Yes-that's the word she used! |
wiggs
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-13-08 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. Yep...he's choreographed SDs coming out pretty well. He's known for a long |
|
time how the WVA primary would go....bet we'll see a bunch tomorrow and the rest of the week.
Or...
...we'll see Hillary bail after kentucky.
|
curious one
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-13-08 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
13. Didn't you hear, she is not bailing. |
bigtree
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-13-08 08:41 PM
Response to Original message |
7. did he mention that he only has one vote, like the rest of us |
|
. . . and that he's already used it in this primary.
What a bore.
|
Gore1FL
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-13-08 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
8. I don't think he votes |
|
But he was actually for Clinton in the beginning.
|
jenmito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-13-08 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
9. He mentioned that Hillary said earlier that MI wouldn't count for anything and is asking |
|
McAuliffe how he can square that statement with the one he's making now-that MI should be counted.
|
OzarkDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-13-08 08:44 PM
Response to Original message |
10. In the real world, it is |
|
Its still a very close race and neither candidae has 2025.
What's interesting is that male Dem candidates with far less support have taken their bids to the Convention. Yet Clinton, the first woman to break the glass ceiling with almost half the votes needed, is being shut out of the Convention.
That will be a black eye on the Party, something that will hurt them for years to come.
|
jenmito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-13-08 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
12. No it's not. He has an insurmountable lead. But at least you use 2025 instead of |
|
the new 2209 that Hillary uses. Hillary got to where she is because of the Clinton name, connections, etc.
|
Rageneau
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-13-08 09:14 PM
Response to Original message |
14. The only people still watching KO are Obamatrons. |
|
He preaches to the choir -- or, rather, to the lynch mob.
|
jenmito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-13-08 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
18. He speaks the truth. Maybe you prefer O'Reilly? |
AtomicKitten
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-13-08 09:15 PM
Response to Original message |
15. Keith continues to speak the unvarnished truth. |
jenmito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-13-08 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
16. I know! He's the BEST! |
jillan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-13-08 09:35 PM
Response to Original message |
19. Who gives a shit what tabloidmann says. |
jenmito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-13-08 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #19 |
21. So you don't like his Special Comments about the Bush admin.? Do you prefer Hannity |
Hepburn
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-13-08 09:36 PM
Response to Original message |
|
...at least some do tell it like it is, Hillary NOT being one of the truth tellers.
Hi, Jen...:hi: A K&R for you!
|
jenmito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-13-08 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
|
Yup! I can always count on him to tell it like it is!
Thanks! :hi:
|
ShortnFiery
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-13-08 09:40 PM
Response to Original message |
24. Yes, only "a Clinton" could remain in the race with "all the math" against her. |
jenmito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-13-08 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #24 |
25. And that's the truth! |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon Jun 17th 2024, 01:27 AM
Response to Original message |