|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Zynx
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 03:56 PM Original message |
Looking forward: What are the swing states? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democrattotheend
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 03:57 PM Response to Original message |
1. You forgot Pennsylvania and Minnesota |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zynx
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 03:58 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. The evidence I see is that Minnesota won't really be close. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harun
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 04:07 PM Response to Reply #3 |
11. Wisconsin won't be either, big win for Obama (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zynx
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 04:42 PM Response to Reply #11 |
24. Wisconsin is a pretty polarized state. However, Obama will clean up in Dane and Milwaukee in a big |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democrattotheend
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 05:49 PM Response to Reply #24 |
41. Wisconsin and Minnesota have same-day registration. That makes a big difference |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zynx
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 06:30 PM Response to Reply #41 |
44. Oh, believe me I know. :-) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 03:58 PM Response to Original message |
2. All of the Mountain West |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zynx
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 03:59 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Are you including Montana, Idaho and Utah? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democrattotheend
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 04:01 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Call me crazy, but I think Montana is worth competing for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Drunken Irishman
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 04:05 PM Response to Reply #4 |
8. Montana, yes, Idaho & Utah no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zynx
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 04:39 PM Response to Reply #8 |
20. I kinda sorta doubt that, regarding Utah. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Drunken Irishman
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 04:48 PM Response to Reply #20 |
26. It's true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zynx
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 05:06 PM Response to Reply #26 |
29. I know, but some polls are drastically off. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PBS Poll-435
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 04:08 PM Response to Reply #2 |
12. Definitely Coleman's Personality |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
XemaSab
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 04:13 PM Response to Reply #2 |
16. Almost all of the western states have Democratic governors |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Texas Hill Country
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 04:00 PM Response to Original message |
5. you skipped WV... Hillary would likely win WV, Barack prolly not, but... still. Also, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democrattotheend
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 04:01 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. She could probably win Arkansas too, and there's no way in hell he can. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Texas Hill Country
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 05:31 PM Response to Reply #7 |
30. absolutely true... i didnt even think about that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewHampshireDem
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 04:12 PM Response to Reply #5 |
15. NH is for now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Drunken Irishman
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 04:05 PM Response to Original message |
9. If Clinton is the nominee, Oregon and Washington go from safe Dem, to toss-up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zynx
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 04:40 PM Response to Reply #9 |
21. I am not even bothering with the idea Clinton will be the nominee. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewHampshireDem
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 04:07 PM Response to Original message |
10. With Obama as the nominee, TX also comes into play |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harun
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 04:08 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. I think he could win Texas (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zynx
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 04:35 PM Response to Reply #10 |
18. There were a couple polls like that, but I also saw a poll earlier that had McCain up 14% which |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lastliberalintexas
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 05:40 PM Response to Reply #10 |
35. Not even with Jesus H. Christ as our nominee |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewHampshireDem
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 05:46 PM Response to Reply #35 |
38. We don't need Jesus, we just need McCain |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stop Cornyn
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 04:09 PM Response to Original message |
14. I like Poblano's model: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zynx
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 04:38 PM Response to Reply #14 |
19. I don't see how Indiana is competitive while New Hampshire is beyond our grasp. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stop Cornyn
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 04:51 PM Response to Reply #19 |
28. I agree that it seems a bit counter-intuitive, but Poblano keeps predicting the results correctly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 04:16 PM Response to Original message |
17. Nominated. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zynx
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 04:41 PM Response to Reply #17 |
22. The Veep choice is important. Either McCain or Obama could put states into play that aren't right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alteredstate
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 04:41 PM Response to Original message |
23. Obama could take South Carolina |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zynx
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 04:43 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. Without more than the 22% of the White vote Kerry got it is statistically virtually impossible. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJSecularist
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 05:46 PM Response to Reply #23 |
39. Obama is not winning South Carolina. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jzodda
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 04:50 PM Response to Original message |
27. Your list looks about right to me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woolldog
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 05:35 PM Response to Original message |
31. I would add the Carolinas. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Texas Hill Country
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 05:36 PM Response to Reply #31 |
34. ummm, no, they are not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PM7nj
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 05:42 PM Response to Reply #34 |
36. There was a Ras poll showing McCain up only 3pts in NC last week |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zynx
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 05:43 PM Response to Reply #36 |
37. I believe those as much as those earlier polls that showed McCain in contention in MA. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woolldog
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 05:54 PM Response to Reply #37 |
43. So you believe some polls but not others.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zynx
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 06:33 PM Response to Reply #43 |
45. Actually, yes I do. I don't believe polls simply on their face. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woolldog
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 05:48 PM Response to Reply #34 |
40. I guess we look at different polls. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewHampshireDem
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 05:36 PM Response to Original message |
32. Kos just put up a poll showing that Alaska could swing our way, too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU GrovelBot
![]() ![]() |
Thu May-15-08 05:36 PM Response to Original message |
33. ## DON'T DONATE TO DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND! ## |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 05:51 PM Response to Original message |
42. Swing states normally have a large population of voters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zynx
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 06:35 PM Response to Reply #42 |
46. That Lake Erie hinge is pretty damn important. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sun Jun 16th 2024, 09:58 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC