|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
PresidentObama
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 10:27 PM Original message |
Who are your top five pick's for Obama's VP? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 10:28 PM Response to Original message |
1. Nope, can't do it. I'll trust Obama to pick the best one for him, and us. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PresidentObama
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 10:30 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Oh come on. That's no fun. At least speculate. Party pooper. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 10:47 PM Response to Reply #3 |
33. Edwards, NO! Obama needs to pick someone with experience, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PresidentObama
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 11:21 PM Response to Reply #33 |
47. Experienced is overrated. But OK, I'll settle for John Kerry :) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 11:46 PM Response to Reply #47 |
52. There's a thought, and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemVet
![]() |
Fri May-16-08 07:22 AM Response to Reply #1 |
62. He may not have too much of a choice. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ilsa
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 10:29 PM Response to Original message |
2. John Edwards and Wes Clark are mine, but I doubt Wes will |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earthlover
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 10:54 PM Response to Reply #2 |
36. Clark is loyal to Clintons, but not beholden to them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 10:30 PM Response to Original message |
4. Edwards -- though I'd prefer ELIZABETH --- !!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PresidentObama
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 10:30 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. John should be AG or VP, and Elizabeth should run for a position in Congress!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Fri May-16-08 09:26 PM Response to Reply #5 |
68. I Love Elizabeth . . . she's a terrific speaker .... and I've onl y seen very positive |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BayouBengal07
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 10:31 PM Response to Original message |
6. I respectfully disagree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PresidentObama
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 10:32 PM Response to Reply #6 |
13. Joe Biden would be great too, thanks for putting him on your list! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goclark
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 10:46 PM Response to Reply #13 |
30. I loved his response today to Bush |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
apocalypsehow
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 10:31 PM Response to Original message |
7. Anyone but HRC. n/t. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Fri May-16-08 09:28 PM Response to Reply #7 |
69. We seem to have positive views of many of the males who ran...but not HRC . .. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 10:31 PM Response to Original message |
8. Whomever it is needs to be squeeky clean |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
patrice
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 10:48 PM Response to Reply #8 |
34. She's also Pro-Choice and taking some heat for it from the Bishop. Fighting Coal powered |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alexander
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 10:31 PM Response to Original message |
9. Russ Feingold, Janet Napolitano, Kathleen Sebelius, Wesley Clark, Barbara Boxer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lost-in-FL
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 10:32 PM Response to Original message |
10. Maybe #3 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
patrice
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 10:53 PM Response to Reply #10 |
35. Webb = signatory to a letter supporting PNAC principles. I think he's been re-born since then, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 11:13 PM Response to Reply #35 |
45. Please post the letter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
patrice
![]() |
Fri May-16-08 06:52 AM Response to Reply #45 |
58. It's been a couple of years since I saw it. I'll have to go look for it later. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
patrice
![]() |
Fri May-16-08 06:56 AM Response to Reply #45 |
59. I don't actually think Obama should consider such a thing a dis-qualifier, but I would hope that he |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onehandle
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 10:32 PM Response to Original message |
11. That's a good list you have there. Edwards, Clark and Clinton would round out the top for me. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PM7nj
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 10:32 PM Response to Original message |
12. Here's mine... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DAGDA56
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 10:32 PM Response to Original message |
14. The only limitation I feel strongly about is no sitting Senator... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 10:34 PM Response to Original message |
15. Top 5: no order yet: Clark, Sebelius, Strickland (ughhhh), Gore, n/a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
XemaSab
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 10:34 PM Original message |
Here's mine: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewHampshireDem
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 10:34 PM Response to Original message |
16. I'd have to say |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chrisnreno
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 10:36 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. LOL. I like that list. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PresidentObama
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 10:37 PM Response to Reply #16 |
22. LOL now tell who you're really for. ha. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewHampshireDem
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 10:40 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. Well, I think I've settled on Clark |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crunchy Frog
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 10:55 PM Response to Reply #16 |
38. I like the cut of your gib. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 10:36 PM Response to Original message |
18. Sebelius, Richardson, Schweitzer, Zinni,and Biden probably, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 10:36 PM Response to Original message |
19. Anybody But Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davidinalameda
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 10:41 PM Response to Reply #19 |
25. amen to that! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anonymous171
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 10:36 PM Response to Original message |
20. My picks: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mystieus
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 10:37 PM Response to Original message |
21. You don't have one of the top 3 candidates listed, Kathleen Gilligan Sebelius |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoodleyAppendage
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 10:40 PM Response to Original message |
23. Feingold, Edwards, Biden, Hagel, Clark |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DAGDA56
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 10:45 PM Response to Reply #23 |
28. Hagel huh? An interesting idea... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blondiegrrl
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 11:02 PM Response to Reply #28 |
41. I think Hagel's a decent guy and I admire his stance against the war, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 11:35 PM Response to Reply #23 |
51. Sticking an anti-choicer like Hagel on the ticket would be a dealbreaker for many. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dhalgren
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 10:44 PM Response to Original message |
26. Well, let's see, in desending order: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
patrice
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 10:44 PM Response to Original message |
27. Sebelius, Richardson, Clark, Edwards, McCaskill nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mathewsleep
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 10:46 PM Response to Reply #27 |
29. wow, we're pretty close. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
patrice
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 10:56 PM Response to Reply #29 |
39. LOL!!! I actually thought of me for #5 too, but had second thoughts!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Boz
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 10:46 PM Response to Original message |
31. Obama/Richardson is the best ticket, Shweitzer and Sebelius tied for second,Sebelius state if not VP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU GrovelBot
![]() ![]() |
Thu May-15-08 10:46 PM Response to Original message |
32. ## DON'T DONATE TO DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND! ## |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 11:34 PM Response to Reply #32 |
50. Obama/Grovelbot! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
riverwalker
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 10:55 PM Response to Original message |
37. ABC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blondiegrrl
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 11:00 PM Response to Original message |
40. 1. Joe Biden, 2. Bill Richardson, 3. Claire McCaskill, 4. Jim Webb, 5. John Edwards (edited) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PresidentObama
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 11:06 PM Response to Reply #40 |
43. McCaskill? Why? She's been a pretty shitty Senator for my state. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iwillnevergiveup
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 11:06 PM Response to Original message |
42. 5, huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tokenlib
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 11:09 PM Response to Original message |
44. Clark, Richardson, Schweitzer, Sebelius, Kaine |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ecstatic
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 11:13 PM Response to Original message |
46. My idealist picks would be Richardson and Napolitano; my realist picks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eric Condon
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 11:31 PM Response to Original message |
48. The thing to remember is that in a GOOD administration (i.e. non-Chimp), the VP doesn't do much |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 11:33 PM Response to Original message |
49. #1: Russ Feingold. #2: Bill Richardson. #3: John Edwards. #4: Wes Clark. #5: Barbara Boxer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stop Cornyn
![]() |
Thu May-15-08 11:50 PM Response to Original message |
53. Warner, McCaskill, Kaine, Napolitano, Nelson (ask me tomorrow and I'll have a different answer) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Indiana_Dem
![]() |
Fri May-16-08 12:05 AM Response to Original message |
54. Webb, McCaskill, Hagel, Schweitzer, Richardson |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PoliticalOne65
![]() |
Fri May-16-08 12:16 AM Response to Reply #54 |
55. Alabama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FredScuttle
![]() |
Fri May-16-08 12:21 AM Response to Original message |
56. Well, since he needs to close gaps with so many voting groups: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rolandosoto
![]() |
Fri May-16-08 12:22 AM Response to Original message |
57. Richardson |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jumptheshadow
![]() |
Fri May-16-08 07:14 AM Response to Original message |
60. Realistically... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cboy4
![]() |
Fri May-16-08 07:16 AM Response to Original message |
61. Just please don't let it be Richardson, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jumptheshadow
![]() |
Fri May-16-08 07:51 AM Response to Reply #61 |
66. Good point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JTFrog
![]() |
Fri May-16-08 07:25 AM Response to Original message |
63. Edwards, Kucinich, Clark, Napolitano, Sebelius - in no particular order. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harun
![]() |
Fri May-16-08 07:32 AM Response to Original message |
64. 1.Dennis Kucinich 2.Russ Feingold 3.Michael Moore 4.Sean Penn 5.Bernardine Dohrn |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jefferson_dem
![]() |
Fri May-16-08 07:36 AM Response to Original message |
65. Webb, Clark, Richardson, Edwards, Hagel |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sfam
![]() |
Fri May-16-08 07:55 AM Response to Original message |
67. 1. Sebelius, 2. Napolitano, 3. Strickland, 4. Clark, 5. Richardson |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Mon Jun 17th 2024, 12:37 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC