|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
IDemo
![]() |
Wed May-28-08 07:51 AM Original message |
Democratic Showdown On Saturday Could Get Ugly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NC_Nurse
![]() |
Wed May-28-08 07:55 AM Response to Original message |
1. Tough shit, them's the rules. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrDan
![]() |
Wed May-28-08 08:09 AM Response to Reply #1 |
5. yep - sure wouldn't want to listen to voters . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RUMMYisFROSTED
![]() |
Wed May-28-08 08:11 AM Response to Reply #5 |
6. No campaigning= Name recognition contest. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrDan
![]() |
Wed May-28-08 08:14 AM Response to Reply #6 |
8. you have got to be kidding |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NC_Nurse
![]() |
Wed May-28-08 08:16 AM Response to Reply #8 |
9. When people meet Obama, they like him. Hillary, not so much. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrDan
![]() |
Wed May-28-08 08:26 AM Response to Reply #9 |
14. well - how many people in reality get a chance to spend enough time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stillcool
![]() |
Wed May-28-08 10:07 AM Response to Reply #14 |
50. you will never know... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrDan
![]() |
Wed May-28-08 10:15 AM Response to Reply #50 |
55. of course not. And if the primary in any other state was shifted a day could that not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stillcool
![]() |
Wed May-28-08 03:26 PM Response to Reply #55 |
69. If the Primary in any other state.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrDan
![]() |
Wed May-28-08 07:37 PM Response to Reply #69 |
70. that is so ridiculous |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stillcool
![]() |
Wed May-28-08 09:42 PM Response to Reply #70 |
73. Exaggeration? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrDan
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 05:26 AM Response to Reply #73 |
82. amazing that you claim to be a democrat and have no problem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stillcool
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 08:09 AM Response to Reply #82 |
84. Voters did not 'lose' their votes... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrDan
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 08:21 AM Response to Reply #84 |
85. no I am not claiming that at all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stillcool
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 10:56 AM Response to Reply #85 |
103. a blanket blame on Florida is accurate.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrDan
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 11:45 AM Response to Reply #103 |
104. yes - and I hold by that. One of the foundations of this party is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stillcool
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 12:49 PM Response to Reply #104 |
109. so votes count..when they don't count.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe the Revelator
![]() |
Wed May-28-08 09:54 PM Response to Reply #70 |
75. That is exactly the point that you are trying to argue. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrDan
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 05:22 AM Response to Reply #75 |
81. I am arguing that we should just go ahead and pick our 2012 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe the Revelator
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 08:35 AM Response to Reply #81 |
87. Its the slippery slope that you're going down by saying that campaigning doesn't matter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrDan
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 09:09 AM Response to Reply #87 |
89. I am just trying to bring a 50-state solution |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gal
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 09:19 AM Response to Reply #89 |
92. Counting Florida will not bring a 50-state solution.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrDan
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 09:34 AM Response to Reply #92 |
99. you know - that is so hard for me to understand |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gal
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 01:19 PM Response to Reply #99 |
113. I don't care about Iowa either...I'm not from there nor argueing for them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrDan
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 01:29 PM Response to Reply #113 |
114. I have no problem with what you are saying |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed May-28-08 08:58 AM Response to Reply #8 |
32. Deleted message |
musicblind
![]() |
Wed May-28-08 11:35 AM Response to Reply #32 |
59. Didn't he just say that he's not supporting Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
musicblind
![]() |
Wed May-28-08 11:38 AM Response to Reply #59 |
60. He just said he does not support Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrDan
![]() |
Wed May-28-08 07:43 PM Response to Reply #32 |
72. well - ignoring your juvenile profanity - but my candidate is not even running |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GihrenZabi
![]() |
Wed May-28-08 09:04 AM Response to Reply #8 |
34. No, you misunderstood |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GihrenZabi
![]() |
Wed May-28-08 09:12 AM Response to Reply #8 |
39. Double post sry n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mkultra
![]() |
Wed May-28-08 08:22 AM Response to Reply #5 |
11. If the voters ignore the rules, the rules ignore the voters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrDan
![]() |
Wed May-28-08 08:28 AM Response to Reply #11 |
19. sounds bites worthy of republican sloganeer. . . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greguganus
![]() |
Wed May-28-08 08:43 AM Response to Reply #19 |
25. Yeah, what the hell are rules good for? Who needs em? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrDan
![]() |
Wed May-28-08 08:50 AM Response to Reply #25 |
27. of course we need them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sybylla
![]() |
Wed May-28-08 09:42 AM Response to Reply #19 |
43. Yep, cuz without rules we'd just be libertarians. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrDan
![]() |
Wed May-28-08 10:01 AM Response to Reply #43 |
46. well perhaps - but I did not break any rules to fall into second-class |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SwampG8r
![]() |
Wed May-28-08 10:06 AM Response to Reply #46 |
49. are you even from florda? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrDan
![]() |
Wed May-28-08 10:11 AM Response to Reply #49 |
53. yes I am - and I can even spell it correctly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SwampG8r
![]() |
Wed May-28-08 11:06 AM Response to Reply #53 |
56. it makes no sense to me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrDan
![]() |
Wed May-28-08 11:50 AM Response to Reply #56 |
61. well - you don't spell so well - and you don't read so well either |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gal
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 09:24 AM Response to Reply #19 |
95. Fairness is treating all 50 states the same. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hokies4ever
![]() |
Wed May-28-08 10:01 AM Response to Reply #5 |
47. Same with the Republican Party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truebrit71
![]() |
Wed May-28-08 02:41 PM Response to Reply #5 |
68. Sorry but the State Dems screwed the voters over AFTER the DNC had told them the consequences.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrDan
![]() |
Wed May-28-08 07:40 PM Response to Reply #68 |
71. yes they did - as did the DNC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truebrit71
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 08:24 AM Response to Reply #71 |
86. Nope. The DNC said don't move it or you'll lose. They moved it anyway and the DNC followed through.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrDan
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 09:01 AM Response to Reply #86 |
88. well - in an attempt to keep this objective - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truebrit71
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 09:16 AM Response to Reply #88 |
91. The voters should have made that abundantly clear to the state leaders...they apparently didn't... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrDan
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 09:31 AM Response to Reply #91 |
97. but . . . the sanctions come from the DNC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truebrit71
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 10:23 AM Response to Reply #97 |
102. And the sanctions were put in place why? Because the STATE PARTY violated the rules. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fed_up_mother
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 12:11 PM Response to Reply #88 |
107. Party members should get equal votes? Remember "super" delegates? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrDan
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 12:39 PM Response to Reply #107 |
108. yes I do - and I think they make us look elitist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hamlette
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 09:13 AM Response to Reply #5 |
90. punish the 48 that followed the rules to appease the few who jumped the line? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gal
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 09:29 AM Response to Reply #90 |
96. +10 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
reflection
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 11:53 AM Response to Reply #90 |
106. I wish I could rec this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mike L
![]() |
Wed May-28-08 09:22 AM Response to Reply #1 |
41. COUNT EVERY VOTE!!!! Don't disinfranchise half of Democratic voters in two states. em |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sybylla
![]() |
Wed May-28-08 09:54 AM Response to Reply #41 |
45. Got my vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RichardRay
![]() |
Wed May-28-08 12:05 PM Response to Reply #45 |
63. I bow in your direction! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sybylla
![]() |
Wed May-28-08 02:33 PM Response to Reply #63 |
64. I'm getting tired of it myself |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hamlette
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 10:00 AM Response to Reply #64 |
101. the worst part is, it is being fueled by a candidate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillyT
![]() |
Wed May-28-08 11:00 PM Response to Reply #45 |
79. Imagine what role Florida and Michigan could have had if their party leaders had acted like adults." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mike L
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 01:18 PM Response to Reply #79 |
112. Right. Hillary would have won without the need for all this. em |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hokies4ever
![]() |
Wed May-28-08 10:02 AM Response to Reply #41 |
48. I bet you have MI and FL state flags in your front yard, even though you live in SC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slinkerwink
![]() |
Wed May-28-08 07:56 AM Response to Original message |
2. I'll be there! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Condem
![]() |
Wed May-28-08 07:56 AM Response to Reply #2 |
3. Looking forward to your reports, slinkerwink. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K Gardner
![]() |
Wed May-28-08 08:12 AM Response to Reply #2 |
7. Obama has wisely requested that there be no "counter protest", so I hope whatever |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemVet
![]() |
Wed May-28-08 08:27 AM Response to Reply #7 |
16. I'll be there... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jsmirman
![]() |
Wed May-28-08 08:35 AM Response to Reply #16 |
21. Wait- isn't this guy a Hillary supporter? So he's advocating a dirty trick here??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Swamp Rat
![]() |
Wed May-28-08 08:52 AM Response to Reply #21 |
29. Yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jsmirman
![]() |
Wed May-28-08 08:38 AM Response to Reply #16 |
22. Just checked- this guy is a clear Hillary supporter advocating a dirty trick against Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemVet
![]() |
Wed May-28-08 08:42 AM Response to Reply #22 |
24. I plan to protest that FL and MI are seated... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slinkerwink
![]() |
Wed May-28-08 08:53 AM Response to Reply #24 |
31. that's not true about it being a federal crime. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemVet
![]() |
Wed May-28-08 08:58 AM Response to Reply #31 |
33. Read what you just wrote. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SwampG8r
![]() |
Wed May-28-08 10:09 AM Response to Reply #33 |
52. this one also |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherina
![]() |
Wed May-28-08 09:08 AM Response to Reply #24 |
38. There's no constitutional right to voting in the Primaries |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jsmirman
![]() |
Wed May-28-08 09:21 AM Response to Reply #24 |
40. Ok, congrats. That's the new "dumbest thing I've ever read on DU." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kittycat
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 09:20 AM Response to Reply #40 |
93. He's clearly a trollio. Best to ignore. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTLawGuy
![]() |
Wed May-28-08 11:56 AM Response to Reply #24 |
62. wow, two wrong statements in one post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherina
![]() |
Wed May-28-08 09:05 AM Response to Reply #16 |
35. Thanks for confirming your total lack of scruples and participation in dirty tricks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crunchy Frog
![]() |
Wed May-28-08 11:27 AM Response to Reply #16 |
57. Good. Now we'll know that any obnoxious "pro Obama" demonstrators |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ichingcarpenter
![]() |
Wed May-28-08 08:24 AM Response to Reply #2 |
12. Did you Get a Ticket? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemVet
![]() |
Wed May-28-08 08:28 AM Response to Reply #12 |
18. "Watch out for Provocateurs masquerading as Obama supporters." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ichingcarpenter
![]() |
Wed May-28-08 08:41 AM Response to Reply #18 |
23. that is no surprise ..... You have revealed your political leanings many times |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemVet
![]() |
Wed May-28-08 08:44 AM Response to Reply #23 |
26. How could... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gal
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 09:35 AM Response to Reply #26 |
100. If it violates a FEDERAL law I'm sure you'll win in court then huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K Gardner
![]() |
Wed May-28-08 08:34 AM Response to Reply #12 |
20. See post #16. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AllentownJake
![]() |
Wed May-28-08 08:28 AM Response to Reply #2 |
17. Be Safe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tatiana
![]() |
Wed May-28-08 08:52 AM Response to Reply #2 |
28. I'm glad you got in!!!! Keep us updated! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marshall
![]() |
Wed May-28-08 08:01 AM Response to Original message |
4. Shouldn't it be "Democratic Showdown on Saturday Could get UGLIER"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Max_powers94
![]() |
Wed May-28-08 09:44 AM Response to Reply #4 |
44. It can if hillary people show their asses |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PassingFair
![]() |
Wed May-28-08 10:00 PM Response to Reply #44 |
76. Or their faces... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Wed May-28-08 08:18 AM Response to Original message |
10. Let's all vow to thank Bill and Hill for NOT knowing how to be "Team Players?" 8 fucking years ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZSlacker
![]() |
Wed May-28-08 08:26 AM Response to Original message |
13. On the news today they mentioned that the delegations can be given 100% seating by the credentials |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crunchy Frog
![]() |
Wed May-28-08 11:30 AM Response to Reply #13 |
58. At some point, Hillary and her minions simply need to be put on ignore. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kittycat
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 09:23 AM Response to Reply #13 |
94. Than call all be seated, but their vote will only count for 50% of it's value. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shadowknows69
![]() |
Wed May-28-08 08:27 AM Response to Original message |
15. If this, Gods forbid, breaks out into violence or mischief |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
workinclasszero
![]() |
Wed May-28-08 08:53 AM Response to Original message |
30. Too damn bad |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GoldieAZ49
![]() |
Wed May-28-08 09:06 AM Response to Original message |
36. The shoes: they will walk away from the party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Doctor_J
![]() |
Wed May-28-08 09:06 AM Response to Original message |
37. It will only get ugly if the Hillarians make it that way |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoonerPride
![]() |
Wed May-28-08 09:27 AM Response to Reply #37 |
42. If the pots and pans crowd gets a real ruckus going, it will be a sad day for our party. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
book_worm
![]() |
Wed May-28-08 10:08 AM Response to Original message |
51. Hillary's whole strategy at this point is to undermine Obama so he loses in November and then she |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GoesTo11
![]() |
Wed May-28-08 10:12 AM Response to Original message |
54. Go Hill! Scorch that Earth! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucky
![]() |
Wed May-28-08 02:37 PM Response to Original message |
65. On a map, Michagan looks just like a boot: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucky
![]() |
Wed May-28-08 02:37 PM Response to Original message |
66. Double post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeschutesRiver
![]() |
Wed May-28-08 02:39 PM Response to Original message |
67. Whenever someone doesn't get what they want |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rocktivity
![]() |
Wed May-28-08 09:49 PM Response to Original message |
74. They CAN'T split the pledged delegates down the middle? That disenfranchises the voters. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZBlue
![]() |
Wed May-28-08 10:01 PM Response to Original message |
77. They are acting like bratty children and Obama and his supporters are acting with class. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GoldieAZ49
![]() |
Wed May-28-08 10:54 PM Response to Reply #77 |
78. now that is FUNNY |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Moochy
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 09:31 AM Response to Reply #78 |
98. yeah he's a low class elite christian crypto-muslim |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZBlue
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 01:08 PM Response to Reply #98 |
111. Don't argue with Ignored. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HooptieWagon
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 12:19 AM Response to Original message |
80. Could get ugly? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
janx
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 05:29 AM Response to Reply #80 |
83. Those people are Republicans. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Swamp Rat
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 11:49 AM Response to Original message |
105. Operation Chaos |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bensthename
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 12:51 PM Response to Original message |
110. Proof here Clinton doesnt care about Sat outcome.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sun Jun 16th 2024, 05:14 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC