|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Danger Mouse
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 12:04 AM Original message |
I'm sorry, but Clinton's argument that she's ahead in 'primary delegates' is UTTERLY SHAMELESS. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJSecularist
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 12:05 AM Response to Original message |
1. Obama's strategy of disenfranchising FL and Michigan is shameless. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Danger Mouse
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 12:06 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. That's laughable at best. Obama wasn't responsible for that mess. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJSecularist
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 12:08 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. He was responsible for smacking down any re-do's. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Danger Mouse
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 12:09 AM Response to Reply #5 |
7. Michigan itself couldn't agree on a re-do, which is the reason Obama gave for not supporting one... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard Steele
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 12:12 AM Response to Reply #5 |
13. Have you ever even CONSIDERED making your assertations "non-laughable"? Even once? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
casus belli
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 12:22 AM Response to Reply #5 |
21. That's not even remotely true, and you know it. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VolcanoJen
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 12:22 AM Response to Reply #5 |
22. Enough with this crap already. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChairmanAgnostic
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 12:25 AM Original message |
ignore is your friend. It certainly is mine. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VolcanoJen
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 12:28 AM Response to Original message |
31. Naw, I don't use ignore. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
salguine
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 07:05 AM Response to Reply #5 |
50. Why should there be a re-do? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 08:55 AM Response to Reply #5 |
55. NO! That is a lie too! HER CAMPAIGN stopped the proposed caucus "redo"s of these states... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemVet
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 05:57 AM Response to Reply #3 |
44. No, he wasn't responsible, but he sure as hell doesn't want their votes to count, does he? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 08:58 AM Response to Reply #44 |
56. He doesn't want the votes in a facade that was called an election to be allowed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Honeycombe8
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 12:08 AM Response to Reply #1 |
6. Obama hasn't disenfranchised anyone. He doesn't have that kind of power. ??? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gabeana
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 12:11 AM Response to Reply #1 |
10. you are a shameless hack |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MidwestTransplant
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 12:16 AM Response to Reply #10 |
15. The facts chased the hack away. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard Steele
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 12:25 AM Response to Reply #15 |
25. Nah, facts don't bother this one. His mommy heard him typing and sent him back to bed. nm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard Steele
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 12:11 AM Response to Reply #1 |
11. Just as correct as you've ever been, NJ. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 12:20 AM Response to Reply #1 |
18. Question for you: did Hillary Clinton agree to the Four State Pledge? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cliffordu
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 12:28 AM Response to Reply #1 |
29. Again with the lie. The bright, shining, lie. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 05:56 AM Response to Reply #1 |
43. Obama's strategy? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carl Yasutomo
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 06:09 AM Response to Reply #1 |
45. Yep, Obama FORCED those states to break the rules, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
billyoc
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 06:33 AM Response to Reply #1 |
46. Strategy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lerkfish
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 07:07 AM Response to Reply #1 |
51. um, yeah, it was HIS conspiracy all along. pass the bong, ok? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sniffa
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 08:11 PM Response to Reply #51 |
60. Does Ignored get the good stuff? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 07:23 AM Response to Reply #1 |
52. you are not being honest or factual. regardless, how doe it justify hillary lying and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raineyb
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 08:09 PM Response to Reply #1 |
59. Yawn! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard Steele
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 12:06 AM Response to Original message |
2. Not a gaffe, not a mistake, not a slip...it's yet another deliberate whopping LIE. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Danger Mouse
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 12:07 AM Response to Reply #2 |
4. There's no weaseling out of it for her. Those were her exact words. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Window
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 07:53 AM Response to Reply #2 |
54. Exactly! A gigantic LIE! Period. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
XemaSab
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 12:09 AM Response to Original message |
8. Dignity, thy name is not Hillary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Danger Mouse
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 12:11 AM Response to Reply #8 |
12. I was just re-gaining some respect for her...and she goes and does this... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VolcanoJen
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 12:24 AM Response to Reply #8 |
23. SNL pretty much nailed it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 12:09 AM Response to Original message |
9. She is going to start claiming to be ahead in "imaginary delegates" next week. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Danger Mouse
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 12:14 AM Response to Reply #9 |
14. What about the 50 Moon Delegates that are up for grabs? I hear they're leaning heavily.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gabeana
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 12:16 AM Response to Original message |
16. What did I miss |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ravy
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 12:20 AM Response to Reply #16 |
17. She actually claimed that she led in delegates that were picked in primaries, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gabeana
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 12:21 AM Response to Reply #17 |
20. Why do Primary delegates count more than caucus delegates? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ravy
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 12:25 AM Response to Reply #20 |
26. I don't think that they do... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gabeana
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 12:28 AM Response to Reply #26 |
30. I'm sorry I should have been mor clear |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Danger Mouse
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 12:53 AM Response to Reply #26 |
39. I'm sure the voters in caucus states would be thrilled to learn... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ravy
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 03:45 AM Response to Reply #39 |
40. The fact is, their votes matter far more than those of primary states. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bjorn Against
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 07:49 AM Response to Reply #26 |
53. Long-standing as in since she started losing them... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
electron_blue
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 06:43 AM Response to Reply #20 |
47. votes in caucuses probably went more to Obama than they would have otherwise |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imagevision
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 12:21 AM Response to Original message |
19. Hillary, wishful thinking and nothing more. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VolcanoJen
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 12:24 AM Response to Original message |
24. We are being totally unfair to Clinton. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NanceGreggs
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 12:50 AM Response to Reply #24 |
37. ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 12:25 AM Response to Original message |
27. She's ahead in shameless bullshit, that's for sure. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ObamaKerryDem
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 12:26 AM Response to Original message |
28. K&R! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CitizenLeft
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 12:29 AM Response to Original message |
32. what's really sad is that she's being laughed at and ridiculed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CakeGrrl
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 12:30 AM Response to Original message |
33. It makes me wonder whether it's just plain shamelessness or desperation or |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 12:32 AM Response to Original message |
34. Good gawd almighty, somebody get a net. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
provis99
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 12:32 AM Response to Original message |
35. I guess caucus delegates are dead to her and her supporters. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SemiCharmedQuark
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 12:33 AM Response to Original message |
36. When did she say this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Danger Mouse
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 12:51 AM Response to Reply #36 |
38. in a letter to the superdels. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GoesTo11
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 03:57 AM Response to Original message |
41. Her argument isn't even true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Danger Mouse
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 05:34 AM Response to Original message |
42. kick for the morning. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeeDeeNY
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 06:58 AM Response to Original message |
48. The dignity train has left the station |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
salguine
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 07:01 AM Response to Original message |
49. Isn't there anything the party can do... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Danger Mouse
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 04:51 PM Response to Reply #49 |
58. Pelosi will endorse Obama after June 3rd...after that, it's only a matter of time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Danger Mouse
![]() |
Thu May-29-08 04:33 PM Response to Original message |
57. Kick for the afternoon, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Fri Jun 21st 2024, 04:18 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC