DainBramaged
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-08 04:49 PM
Original message |
So Democrats in Washington prove beyond a shadow of a doubt |
|
we (the blogosphere) mean nothing to them, and they are scared shirtless of asswipes and shitheels like Joe LIEberman. The Repukes have us pegged. Harry 'Bullshit' Reid is useless, and Nancy Pelosi is no better.
Fuck the Senate and Congress. Long live the few who tried to get this prick out of our Caucus. I won't be making any donations to the DLCC anytime soon.
|
Dr Fate
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-08 04:52 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Ever notice that when Republicans get what they want... |
|
Edited on Tue Nov-18-08 04:52 PM by Dr Fate
...there are always posters with either Hillary or DLC icons telling us why it is such a good idea?
|
DainBramaged
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-08 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. Yup. We have been had again. Reid needs to go |
|
we need someone with balls, large brass spiked balls leading the Senate.
|
Wapsie B
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-08 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
I agree there needs to be someone the complete opposite of Reid up there.
|
Sebastian Doyle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-08 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. Well, the opposite would be Bernie Sanders |
|
But he's not technically a Democrat. Though he's far more of one than any member of the DLC.
|
Thrill
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-08 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. Thats easy. Barbara Boxer should be the leader of the Senate |
DainBramaged
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-08 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. Anyone but Harry 'Who Me" Reid. Anyone. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Sep 25th 2024, 11:51 PM
Response to Original message |