Meg Whitman has already started

[Kajsa]

with her post-primary campaign ads!

I just saw it. We got a four day reprieve from her ads-four days!

When she said she was willing to spend up to $150 million on her ads
this time around, she wasn't kidding.

:banghead:

Couldn't some of that money go towards actually helping people
here in California- her big campaign pitch?

[Retrograde]

1. Sure it could - but how would that benefit her?

I think the "Meg Whitman Parks Endowment" or the "Meg Whitman Scholarship Fund" or the "Meg Whitman Public Health Facility" would be a better and more lasting legacy than Meg Whitman, mediocre governor, but she obviously doesn't. Can anyone say stepping stone for 2016 - or even 2012?

[Kajsa]

2. You got that right, Retrograde.

Winning this race is all that matters to her.
The people of CA?- not so much.

:(

[Cleita]

3. What Jerry Brown needs to do for his campaign.

He needs to ask the voters this question. Do they really want a governor who has spent $80 million dollars already to get a job that pays $150 thousand dollars a year with no limit in sight? Randi Rhodes pointed this out last week.

Do we really want someone to run the state who thinks like Marie Antoinette?