From their Sunday 10/22 editorial about negative campaigning:
"Some Senate campaigns are setting records for millions of dollars spent, including Democrat Ned Lamont's investment of his personal fortune."
http://www.theday.com/re.aspx?re=1fecc7ae-3f8e-47f6-9b54-e3246406cf3dPoint 1: Lieberman has raised millions of dollars more than Lamont. Lieberman's campaign is the record-breaker, not Lamont's.
Point 2: Lamont called for a campaign spending cap before the primary. LIeberman refused.
Point 3: Why talk about the source of Lamont's money (his own fortune) without mentioning that Lieberman gets his money from lobbyists, PAC's and Republican operatives?
The editorial page editor is Morgan McGinley and his e-mail is m.mcginley@theday.com