OnBackground
(168 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon May-02-05 09:51 AM
Original message |
Rep. Linder: Airliner Deaths Not Catastrophe |
|
Rollcall has a <a href="http://www.rollcall.com/issues/50_108/hoh/9090-1.html">humdinger</a> from Rep. John Linder of Georgia on how many dead people it takes to be a catastrophe:
<blockquote>“If an airline is blown up in the air, that is a very bad circumstance for 200 or 300 people. But it is not a catastrophe,” Linder said during a hearing last week in the House Homeland Security Committee. </blockquote>
|
BlueEyedSon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon May-02-05 09:53 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Right. 9/11 was only a catastrophe because of its effect on the markets. |
|
Edited on Mon May-02-05 09:54 AM by BlueEyedSon
But actually it was a gift to the neocons.
|
punpirate
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon May-02-05 10:01 AM
Response to Original message |
2. There's definitely a joke... |
|
... in there somewhere, along the lines of the old joke about Bush explaining the difference between tragedy and accident. I guess the only catastrophe this guy recognizes is losing an election....
But, Linder got Bob Barr's seat, so I think the joke is sort of what Molly Ivins meant by repeating a comment about the Texas Legislature: "If you think these guys are nuts, you should see some of their constituents."
Same principle. :)
|
tanyev
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon May-02-05 10:03 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Mon May-02-05 10:04 AM by tanyev
Is he saying that the murder of Laci Peterson and her unborn baby was not a national catastrophe? Or the death of Terri Schiavo? Because the news coverage sure made it seem that way to me. Somebody call a fundie talking head to reframe this right away!
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Sep 19th 2025, 06:30 PM
Response to Original message |