opihimoimoi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-19-04 02:15 AM
Original message |
Hawaii has a chance to take Kerry over the top...... |
|
with a lousy 3 votes, Hawaii can be the deciding factor in this razor thin race......
Blue Hawaii has new meaning.....
|
sidestreamer
(263 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-19-04 02:50 AM
Response to Original message |
1. As if Hawaii would ever go Republican anyway? |
|
We're safe over there. It's the swing states like New Hampshire that will determine this election.
|
opihimoimoi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-19-04 08:37 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. Hawaii helped JFK in 1960. That was a nailbiter year and all I was |
|
saying is....this just might be a another one. Hawaii most likely will go Blue but that is besides the point...
GO KERRY
|
oasis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-19-04 02:56 AM
Response to Original message |
2. I don't want it to be that close. We deserve a landslide, not a nailbiter. |
opihimoimoi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-19-04 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
4. Kinda looks like a landslide but one never knows...History |
|
has a way of repeating itself....that is....when it comes to Human matters.
|
KamaAina
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-19-04 01:01 PM
Response to Original message |
5. That would be 4 votes (perhaps the 4th isn't lousy?!) |
|
with a lousy 3 votes
Electoral votes = no. of Congressional reps + 2 (for the two senators)
So, two reps (Abercrombie, Case) + two senators (Inouye, Akaka) = a massive haul of four electoral votes.
The electoral college sucks anyway, because it forces the whole campaign into a few "swing states". The only upside is that we don't have to look at any Bush* ads!
|
opihimoimoi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-19-04 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. 3 LOUSY VOTES AND ONE GOOD ONE.... |
|
I luv it....
Any Bush ads here would be money down a rat hole...
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Sep 18th 2025, 12:12 PM
Response to Original message |