petersjo02
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-16-09 04:33 PM
Original message |
|
PollTracker
IA-SEN Grassley (R) 51%, Vilsack (D) 40% Oct 16 R2KR2K * IA-SEN Grassley (R) 51%, Conlin (D) 39% Oct 16 R2K * IA-SEN Grassley (R) 52%, Krause (D) 35% Oct 16 R2K * IA-SEN Grassley (R) 54%, Fiegen (D) 31% Oct 16 R2K * IA-GOV Branstad (R) 48%, Culver (D) 43% Oct 16 R2K
|
Bluzmann57
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-16-09 06:00 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Quite frankly, that's depressing |
|
Grassley big over anyone? That stinks.
|
DU9598
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-16-09 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
Grassley has never been challenged by a well-funded candidate. Nor has he ever had to debate one on one with a well-organized and polished, poised candidate. I think it is becoming increasing clearly that Grassley is showing early signs of dementia and will have several missteps if he is challenged strongly as I think it is becoming very clear that he will be. If it is Conlin, by next November Grassley will be lucky if he has it left in him to mow his freaking yard after she demolishes him relentlessly.
As for Branstad, been there and done that. Branstad may be the best thing that could happen for Culver to wake up his floundering ways. No way Tax Hike Terry is going to inspire the tea baggers and the anti-gay elements of the wacko RPI.
|
rurallib
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-17-09 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. I would respectfully say that if Grassley can only get 52% HE'S IN DEEP SHIT |
|
Seriously - at this time in the election Chuckie's usually looking at 70 or 75%. All the other candidates are essentially unknown, yet Chuckie can only get 52%. He should bet shitting his depends.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun Sep 21st 2025, 05:33 AM
Response to Original message |