she allowed the DCCC to advise and almost takeover her campaign. This time she didn't ask them. She wanted to do this with the supporters she had in Kansas. She's refused money from the PACs that gave her so much back in 2004, including AIPAC, because she didn't want to be beholden to them or their ideas.
fwiw, she was getting lamblasted on the KSDP website for supporting abortion, gay marriage and Darwin from what appears to be a freeper. I've highlighted Nancy's stances that the writer is upset about.
In order to make an informed decision I went to IVOTEVALUES.COM Mr. Ryun had clearly publicized his positions on the issues for all to see. Nancy Boyda refused to do so. I wrote to Nancy Boyda's election headquarters and stated that if she wanted my consideration, she should make clear her views on the following issues. I stated... Are you pro life? Or pro abortion? are you in favor of protecting the sanctity of marriage?, and do you feel that creation should be addressed equally to evolution in the Kansas classroom? The response that I received was lengthy, wordy, and devoid of any affinative answer. Nancy did not have time to respond, however I received a letter from her campaign manager stating that �??Nancy felt that the questions required a �??YES, or NO�?� answer, and that these are not �??YES or NO�?� questions.
She does however feel that it is appropriate to have an abortion if the mother and a doctor think that it is in the best interest of the mother. (Murder is OK if you get a doctors excuse.)
Gays should have the right to marry. (Sodomy, polygamy, and marrying my own sister is OK with old Nance!) and that
Darwin was right and she doesn�??t care what science or God has to say about it. I am obviously being extreme, but this was my interpretation of her manager�??s response. Please do your own investigation of her views before you cast a vote for someone who is hiding her viewpoints.
http://www.ksdp.org/node/441You might pass this on to them.