I agree. Nothing is more important than speaking up whenever and wherever possible.
Yet, at the same time: what's required is for Democratics to take specific stands. In the background NPR rattles on. Earlier they mentioned today's polls in relation to the censure motion and the national dems failure to support it.
Well, here in my congressional district, the first of KY, mostly western KY but some southcentral as well, there's a candidate, Jim Bloink, who I believe would stand up and support censure were he in congress. Why do I think that? Because he's publicly posted his desire to see the troops out of Iraq now. Is that a guarantee? Not to my mind. But I believe it's indicative of a candidate who is not afraid of the electorate and such a candidate, once in office, has a far greater chance of withstanding the pressure to get along and go along and get reelected that naturally prevails in DC.
As it happens, Bloink's issue page directly and substantially addresses all five of your points. Please give it a read:
http://www.jimbloinkforcongress.com/issues.html Periodically I write LTE. I think that's an effective way to communicate with our neighbors. But to be sure, if we don't get together and elect candidates who speak up in the primaries, we deserve more than the cowering folks we currently employ?