food for thought

[luckyleftyme2]

always interested in fact I visited the web site "junk science.com" this site is well named!
I was fortunate to work on several of the latest military projects in my day. one of them being the sage project in topsham. this was a (computer center basically)top secret
new era in missile defense.(at the time)
well their was a few flaws in the projects theory,one was that the latest facts on the curvature of the earth was wrong. so the intercepts were miles off. the point is that some of the greatest minds were at odds with each other over why the system was not working. but the fact remained (common sense) the intercepts were poor.
Now I just went to junk science to explore why they claim global warming,and green house gases aren't causing the earths atmosphere to warm up. common sense tells me that the glaciers are retreating faster than scientists predicted,the polar caps are retreating at a much faster rate than predicted. yet junk science seems to think they have the solution.
well I think that neither side has a handle on it,that both sides are using old theories to prove their point.I Found many flaws and referrals in the junk science that was old theory while trying to conclude the opposite conclusion(wondered if the author was a lawyer)
but common sense tells me that if the polar caps disappear,if we continue to rape the forests,continue to pollute the air,ruin our water sheds,store our garbage in land fills
dump waste in the oceans some where down the line we're going to need to find another
planet or perish.
who's looking for an answer,definitely not this administration