ogneopasno
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-05-09 06:27 PM
Original message |
Carl Pohlad is dead at 93. |
Minnesota Raindog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-06-09 08:12 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Did he try to get the taxpayers to pay for his funeral? n/t |
loveable liberal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-06-09 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
"Pay for my funeral or I'll bury myself in North Carolina" HA!!
|
USA_1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-07-09 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
6. America's # 1 Corporate Welfare Recipient |
|
The Christian Bible says it will be easier for a camel to fit through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter Heaven.
I wonder how much fun Pohlad is having by counting his money in the other place.
|
loveable liberal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-06-09 09:54 AM
Response to Original message |
|
I wonder if he ever found a way to take it with him.
|
Thegonagle
(548 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-06-09 08:42 PM
Response to Original message |
4. His son will continue to manage the business aspect of the Twins, and hopefully, |
|
his son will continue to keep the Twins in Minnesota, as Carl did.
There. I said something nice. (He kept the Twins in Minnesota.)
Of course, he got taxpayers to pay for the new stadium. Now, there's no denying that it's going to be a pretty damn cool stadium, and it did help spearhead the Northstar Commuter-Hiawatha LRT connection, but he fought tooth-and-nail for a public subsidy--that we couldn't afford--for construction. So Pohlad wins the rewards, and the public "wins" the risks, which plain means we lost on that deal.
I'm ambivalent, I guess.
|
dflprincess
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-06-09 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. Not only a cool stadium |
|
but in April, September and October (if we ever get back to the Series) down right cold. Remember opening day last year?
|
mduffy31
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-09 02:19 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
7. Should have been a retractable roof like Milwaukee's |
dflprincess
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-09 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
|
And the way they built this one, a roof can't even be added. I say we start a pool on how long it will be before the team starts whining for a new statdium with a retractable roof. I'm betting 4/30/2010.
|
Faintlyodd09
(2 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-24-09 03:29 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
|
I'm not hearing negative comments from Kansas City, Chicago, Detroit or Cleveland about having to look up at blue skies during a game. This new outdoor stadium will be great. We can always run indoors to the Dome if it rains too hard. :)
|
dflprincess
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-24-09 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
10. They should have put a retractable roof on it. |
|
And, I'm not worried about the rain - but it was snowing awfully hard on opening day last year.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon Sep 22nd 2025, 10:27 PM
Response to Original message |