on "marriage". They have no problem with two same-gender people getting married, as long as it is directly not thrown in your face. If it is presented as a normal, not unusual (which most are, a few push boundaries), it is a live and let live approach.
It is point 4 of their platform.
http://www.independenceminnesota.org/about-the-ip/platformprinciples/63-liberty4. We believe that all law-abiding citizens are entitled to the full rights and protections of citizenship and that discrimination on the basis of race, gender, ethnicity, sexual orientation, or religion are contrary to American values.If she cannot get by with the middle-of-the-road party, she has no chance in the 5th CD running as an DFLer, as the DFL is even more inclusive.
http://dfl.org/vertical/Sites/%7BC04B0B6A-109E-4F2D-A1B2-C92EC337D546%7D/uploads/%7B1328833E-75DD-4459-B5AD-5C4900749C94%7D.PDF
• Allow same-gender couples to marry and to share fully and equally in the rights, responsibilities and commitment of civil marriage.
• In the absence of marriage equality, fully recognize civil unions for same-sex domestic partners and make available to them all the rights, privileges, and protections available to married couples.
• Oppose any amendment to the Minnesota Constitution that prohibits
or limits marriage, civil unions, and/or legal protections to same-sex couples.
• Repeal the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy of the U.S. military and open service of gay and lesbians in the armed forces.
• Support domestic partner benefits for all public employees in Minnesota.
That stance is so out of place in two of the three major parities in Minnesota.