pstokely
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-23-06 06:10 AM
Original message |
Raygun day probably coming to Missouri |
proud2BlibKansan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-23-06 08:27 AM
Response to Original message |
1. If it gives me a day off of work I am all for it |
nickinSTL
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-23-06 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
doubt I'll get the day off...and I'd probably find some way to spend the day protesting it if I did. :evilgrin:
|
pstokely
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-24-06 02:46 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
6. Don't think schools would be closed on Raygun day |
proud2BlibKansan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-24-06 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
7. Then I oppose the idea |
xmas74
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-23-06 09:30 AM
Response to Original message |
|
We already have President's Day so why do we need a day for just one president? I understand having Truman Day-he is our native son and should be honored. But Reagan Day?
I'm writing letters.
|
NoFederales
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-23-06 07:50 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Ronald Reagan Day--what a fucking joke! It makes almost as much sense |
|
as honoring some tourist who decided to take a dump at a Git-N-Go off of I-70 (or pick any other highway).
Isn't Truman enough? At least there are Missouri connections. I don't know whether Bush or Reagan will go down as worst President ever in my book, but I sure as hell don't intend to honor any semblance of respect that others may try to bestow on we commoners here in the Show-Me State.
NoFederales
|
pstokely
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-24-06 02:45 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. Repukes want to stamp Rayguns name on everything |
|
Edited on Fri Mar-24-06 02:55 AM by pstokely
why don't they just name a toxic waste dump, mental hospital, or sewage treatment plant after him?
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Sep 18th 2025, 10:21 PM
Response to Original message |