mmonk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-01-05 10:49 PM
Original message |
|
Can we sue due to conflict of interest (Keith Long) as well as the lateness of diebold's bid?
|
dweller
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-01-05 11:05 PM
Response to Original message |
|
:shrug:
Diebold is on the out in NC.
dp
|
mmonk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-01-05 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
dweller
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-02-05 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
supernova
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-02-05 07:45 AM
Response to Original message |
| 4. The still doesn't absolve Diebold |
|
of having to release the code in the event of a recount.
Have they decided to do that now?
Otherwise, it's a useless gesture. And sure it smells to high heaven. Where's Roy Cooper? :grr:
|
Richard Steele
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-02-05 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
| 5. I'm sure they will be absolved from that as well, when the day comes. |
|
Damn, damn, DAMN!
I shoulda known this was in the works; they just rolled over too easily when they lost in court.
They knew it didn't matter because their MOLE already told them he would ignore the law.
Where is Roy Cooper, indeed?
|
wildeyed
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-02-05 01:44 PM
Response to Original message |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat Nov 01st 2025, 01:45 AM
Response to Original message |