New Ohio DEM A.G. PROMISED to Investigate Ohio 2004 on 9/30/06, Cleveland

[autorank]

I live blogged a conference in Cleveland at the end of September where the Democratic candidate
for Attorney General said, flat out, he would investigate election fraud in Ohio 2004. He spoke at
"We Count" which consists of real, hard core election activists who to the person think Ohio
was stolen in 2004. GUESS WHAT...Democrat Mark Dann won for Attorney General and the replacement
for Blackwell at Secretary of State (elections) is a DEMOCRAT. oopSSS...lots of good things happened
in Ohio yesterday.

From my live blog of the Cleveland Oh, "We Count Conference" - September 30, 21 2003
autorank Sat Sep-30-06 10:10 AM
Response to Original message

http://tinyurl.com/ycwapw

1. OH Democratic Attorney Gen. Candidate - Investigate Electing Fraud

State Senator Dann is running for Ohio A.G. He pointed out that Ohio Bill 3 gives the A.G. direct proctorial authority on prosecuting election fraud.

"If such a crime was committed in Ohio (referring to election fraud in 2004)...you will know what happened. There's a cop on the beat."

He said that he needed to win big when asked if he thought that the election might be rigged.

Lets get this guy elected

http://www.dannforohio.com/welcome.php

HERE ARE THE TOTALS FOR A.G. AND SECRETARY OF STATE, OHIO

ATTORNEY GENERAL

52.32% Democrat: Dann, Marc - 1,892,685 - votes

47.68% Republican, Montgomery, Betty - 1,725,058 votes
-------------------------------------------------------------------
SECRETARY OF STATE

54.71% Democrat: Brunner, Jennifer L. - 1,957,439 votes

40.80% Republican: Hartmann, Greg - 1,459,870 votes



AND HERE'S WHERE THEY WILL START LOOKING TO FIND THE NASTY STUFF THAT WENT ON THERE.

==>Ohio Vigilance http://www.ohiovigilance.org/

:patriot:
On edit: I have TOTAL RESPECT and I am in AWE of Ohio voting rights activists and I
couldn't be happier with the Democrats and the voters of Ohio. You stood in the face
of tyranny and didn't back down.

...and VICKI LOVEGREN a special thanks!!!!!!!!
:patriot:

[texpatriot2004]

1. Wow! "Series!" This is "HUGH" nm

[autorank]

5. Oh yeah, or as Stone Cold says "Hell Yeah"

:hi:

[texpatriot2004]

7. Oh my my, oh hell yeah...

let's see, 4 years (or more) of record keeping compared to, uh, what they got - nothing...

*Big Smile*

[stepnw1f]

2. AWESOME!!!!!! KICK

[file83]

3. This MUST be done, because once the investigation is complete and PROVES

beyond a shadow of a doubt that election fraud took place, then it PROVES that Bush shouldn't have won in 2004.

This will then lead to Election Reform the likes of which we've never seen.

[autorank]

6. The *shadow government* gets the curtain riipped back exposing...

...a little fat guy with a funny hat. It's all good!!!

I love Ohio activists and Ohio Democrats.

In behalf of the rest of the nation, thank you.

[OnyxCollie]

4. I voted for Marc Dann!

I heard him speak about going after Taft. Glad to read he's on the job.

[autorank]

11. Seemed like a great guy. That he showed up at "We Count" is

a real comment. This was hard core election fraud stuff...very serious to, a high quality of presentation and analysis.

He seemed like a good guy also.

[Kolesar]

8. Good catch, Autorank. Please keep us posted ... eom

[autorank]

12. Will do and I hope Dann takes away that requirement;)

...which would mean he was going for it.

Ironically, Richard Hayes Phillips spoke the same morning. He has "the goods" on 2004 in ways few others, maybe nobody other, has.

Ohio, :yourock:

[Dee625]

9. How would this be done?

I would LOVE to see the 2004 election really investigated, but how could you?
Sure, there would be some things you could investigate - like the hijinx with voting machine distribution, cardstock and the recount witnesses' testimony of irregularities with that, but any evidence of the vote itself is long since destroyed I'm sure. So we'll never know what the real totals were.

[Kolesar]

10. could piece together the "improper" recounts that were done

Where the ballots were not randomly selected. It's detective work.

[Dee625]

13. Yes, that part could be done

I have all my notes and copies. :-)
I don't ever expect to use them, but they're there just in case.

But as a recount witness, I couldn't tell you what the vote really was in my county.
So I figure that will never be known.

[autorank]

14. Good question; good news

Richard Hayes Phillips Declaration to court http://tinyurl.com/vzs9a

Remember when Fitrakis and Arnebeck got those 2004 ballots saved.
http://www.bobforohio.com/newsclips/2006/sep/news2006-09-01.php
There was a purpose I suspect.

This is a lot of evidence and it was gathered by people, smart as they are, who had no support or backing, legal sanction.

Now...well, the man said he'd look into it at a conference populated 100% by people who think 2004 Ohio was stolen...he knew where he was speaking and what he was saying.

We'll hope...

[Dee625]

15. I didn't know that!

Thanks so much for the link. I guess I've lost touch with the latest. Great news.