Viva_La_Revolution
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-06-08 03:55 PM
Original message |
top presidential candidates receiving contributions from Portland/Vancouver SCARY |
|
last data update - Oct. 29, 2007. I sure hope it's changed since then... $489,200 Romney, Mitt $221,705 Edwards, John $160,590 Obama, Barack $134,208 Clinton, Hillary $121,800 Giuliani, Rudy $68,375 McCain, John $43,442 Paul, Ron $34,150 Richardson, Bill $18,848 Kucinich, Dennis $11,000 Thompson, Fred $10,420 Huckabee, Mike $2,650 Hunter, Duncan $2,500 Gravel, Mike $1,500 Biden, Joe http://www.opensecrets.org/ziplookup/index.php?zip=97223&submit=Go%21
|
Uncle Sinister
(503 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-06-08 10:37 PM
Response to Original message |
1. I think it's AWSOME! Edwards has raised more than anyone but Mitt! |
Viva_La_Revolution
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-06-08 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. Well, that part is great... |
|
Edited on Sun Jan-06-08 10:42 PM by Viva_La_Revolution
I was shocked to see Mittens at #1 :scared: I know the next quarter returns will change the percentages big time. :)  to DU! :hi:
|
0rganism
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-09-08 08:46 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Mitt is the corporatists' candidate du jour, so of course he's going to do well among the well-heeled exploiting class -- and the Mormons.
total for Rs: $746887 top 3: $679375 (~90%)
total for Ds: $573501 (76% of the Rs) top 3: $516503 (~90%, again)
I'd guess this to be a decent take for Democratic candidates compared to past years, and the moneys will be much closer for the general. Some of us won't have a lot of $$ to contribute to primary contenders, tend to save it for the general where it'll be more effective.
|
Viva_La_Revolution
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-10-08 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. The new totals will be coming out soon too |
|
I'm sure I'll feel a little better then. Morning! :hi:
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat Sep 20th 2025, 10:36 PM
Response to Original message |