PADEMJES12
(446 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-05-10 07:59 AM
Original message |
Article on Critz past at Parkins, Inc from pa2010 |
JPZenger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-05-10 09:23 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Hafer is going after him with both barrels |
|
Edited on Fri Mar-05-10 09:23 AM by JPZenger
Hafer really really wants this House seat (which will probably be abolished in 2012 after the US Census results are implemented).
She has been attacking Critz with both barrels. I don't know if it is justified or not.
She has been questioning whether Critz was involved in some ethically challenged activities of Murtha involving defense contractors and earmarks.
The linked article doesn't sound serious. Critz was a part-time bookkeeper for a company that didn't always pay its taxes on time. My wife was a bookkeeper for a company that didn't pay its taxes on time. You can't automatically blame the employee. Sometimes you have to do what the boss tells you to do.
|
PADEMJES12
(446 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-05-10 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. Critz was the frickin book keeper... |
|
Unless he was in a coma.... he damn well knew what was going on. More corporate corruption.
Im sure the Wall Street cronies, corporate officers, ive heard them testify that they didnt know what was going on either. This is very serious.
|
blue neen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-05-10 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. Are you in District 12? |
|
Do you know Mark Critz personally or did you work with him?
How are you qualified to know exactly what went on in his former place of employment?
|
PADEMJES12
(446 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-05-10 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. Im referring to the article. |
|
Edited on Fri Mar-05-10 11:36 AM by PADEMJES12
Dan from pa2010 an investigative reporter. I have no personal knowledge other than the first hand evidence presented to me. To suggest that someone who worked there for several years as the book keeper and a corporate officer didnt know whats going on... well thats quite convenient. Im sure more details are to follow.
This is very bad news for the Democrats if they are stuck with him.
|
blue neen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-05-10 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. "The" Democrats? "They"? |
PADEMJES12
(446 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-05-10 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
|
i say they, because i dont put the me in the "they" who would consider supporting someone like this. Cernic, Hafer, or Bucchianeri will do for me.
|
blue neen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-05-10 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
7. You've haven't had much to say about Arlen Specter lately. |
|
Have you turned your attentions to PA-12 now?
|
PADEMJES12
(446 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-05-10 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
8. I admit... no digs...not much to say when.... |
|
Edited on Fri Mar-05-10 06:57 PM by PADEMJES12
Sestak is down by 24 and just got endorsed by a guy Massa, who a day later got accused of molesting a staffer.
An aside, regardless of who we do or dont like blue neen, Im very fixated on the lack of "traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice" in the process and the cowardice that state party leadership has shown as well as some expedient and corrupt "bought and paid for" local party officials.
Observationally, its a disgrace and there will likely be tremendous backlash. Bucchianeri, Hafer, and cernic were railroaded for some guy... who have been engaged in very questionable actions.
This is like picking the guy who doesnt brush his teeth or comb his hair for a month for the "best hygene" award.
The process Dem functionary Patrick McKenna claims is "fair and representative"... is an embarrassment. Take a poll and see that blow out :) He should have said, "its been very, very selective."
Id be ashamed to stand up and say such a thing. Then again, he's a functionary.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Sep 23rd 2025, 12:35 PM
Response to Original message |