Also, he is more progressive than Specter, while not being exactly ultra-liberal.
You can confirm the polls at real clear politics:
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2010/senate/2010_pennsylvania_senate_race.htmlYou can read about their records and interest group ratings at Project Vote Smart:
Specter:
http://www.votesmart.org/summary.php?can_id=53340Sestak:
http://www.votesmart.org/summary.php?can_id=58333Remember that Specter put Thomas, Scalia, Alito and Roberts on the Supreme Court.
Specter voted for DOMA.
Specter (in 2004 running against Toomey in the primary) supported privatizing social security, instituting a flat tax, and eliminating the estate tax.
Sestak has a high score (95% or so) from League of Conservation Voters, even in 2009 Specter only got 64%, and Specter's lifetime lcv score is much lower.
Yes, I am supporting Sestak.
As for governor, as far as I'm concerned, the only non-republican running is Hoeffel. Onorato has such a commanding lead I'm sure he'll win, so may as well make a statement and vote for the one progressive on the ticket. (And Williams isn't really running for governor, don't fool yourself. Look for JPZenger's posts on that topic for the explanation. and anyway his big issue is taxpayer funding of private school vouchers. F*** that.)
Edit to add: remember those 'missed vote' ads Specter is running? How disingenuous of him. Go to lcv.org and count missed votes on KEY environmental votes. Specter missed 2/11 (more than 10%); Sestak missed only 1 in 15. Who is the no-show when it counts?