"What were the Orie jurors thinking? One can only imagine . . ."

[Divernan]

These snips are from a Post-Gazette blog, with humorous, totally fictional speculation about jury deliberations:
Monday, March 07, 2011
By Gary Rotstein, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
snips

Juror No. 3: And doing it during the regular workday, when they're paid by taxpayers, but the defense says it was voluntary, personal, I-love-the-senator-and-her-sister-the-judge comp time --
************
Juror No. 6: Maybe I shouldn't bring this up, but does anyone else think there's something odd about the appearance of the Orie sisters?
**********************
Juror No. 4: Well, for fun one time, I took one of those handwriting analysis seminars. You know, where you can figure out someone's personality? And I tell you, there's something funny about some of the signatures on the documents in this case.
*******************
Juror No. 4: No, like somebody's been moving signatures around on the defense documents, making it look like people have been signing papers when they haven't. Very fishy, considering how those signatures would supposedly help the senator's case ...
http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/11066/1130222-294.stm#ixzz1FvIN2nCq