Dying Eagle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-30-05 07:35 PM
Original message |
Is it true that Ben Afflack may run for Senate in VA? |
|
I heard it on CBS news the other mourning. Anyone else hear this rumor? Could it happen?
|
sniffa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-30-05 07:38 PM
Response to Original message |
Dying Eagle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-30-05 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
The story said state Dem's are try to convince Afflack to run for US Senate. Reports also said that Afflack was looking to buy a house in VA
|
Dying Eagle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-30-05 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
Poppyseedman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-30-05 07:50 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Why would the party want Ben Afflack to run for the Senate??? |
|
Edited on Fri Sep-30-05 07:52 PM by Poppyseedman
How about a House seat to prove he actually knows a thing or two besides acting.
Not ripping the guy, but does he even have a brain ??? Does he own a spine to stand up and be counted???
Huge difference between pretending to be a politician and actually working as one
|
Dying Eagle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-30-05 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
|
but take your pick Afflack or Allen? I'll take Afflack any time!
|
Poppyseedman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-30-05 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. There is no possible way for Afflack to beat Allen |
|
I can already see the commercials
|
Dying Eagle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-30-05 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
|
Tell that to California, noway Arnold would become Governor
|
Poppyseedman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-30-05 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
|
Afflack isn't Arnold and Allen isn't straddled with Gray Davis problems
Davis was recalled is the only reason the Governator is there in the first place
Not even in the same ball park
|
Dying Eagle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-30-05 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
|
when we all heard that Arnold was running for Gov, we LOFAO. If was a huge joke. No way Davis will be recalled! No way Arnold would replace him! Then as the campaign started and we got to see him in action we started to realize Arnold had a shot. So don't count out Afflack just yet.
|
TheVirginian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-02-05 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
12. Virginia isn't California. Absolutely no way anyone from Hollywood wins |
|
Especially against Allen.
|
delete_bush
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-30-05 08:12 PM
Response to Original message |
abluelady
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-01-05 08:33 AM
Response to Original message |
|
has been approached. That makes lots more sense to me that Affleck. I believe that Grisham could beat Allen.
|
lynne
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-02-05 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
13. Hello!! This is VIRGINIA - the Old Dominion - one of |
|
the original 13 colonies, the "Home Of Presidents", for God's sake!
Why would anyone consider sticking VA - or any state, for that matter - with a candidate that has never held an elected office?? I really don't think its too much to ask for a candidate that has some minimal public office experience to run as Senator.
Personally, to consider running someone based on their popularity and name recognition value alone without regard to their inexperience in serving the public is - IMO - a slap in the face of each Virginian. Certainly we can do better than that!
|
Duppers
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-06-05 01:10 AM
Response to Reply #13 |
14. name recognition matters most |
|
If they can elect actors, so can we. What is of most importance is that the candidate be progressive, liberal, have some brains, and a heart in the right place.
Idiots can hold office in Virginia--that's well-proved. I'd match this actor's brain against Allen's any day.
I have little faith in the electorate these days; they settle for mediocrity and a name. We could do worse than Ben Affleck, who could be a place-holder til we got a better dem.
|
Duppers
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-07-05 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
16. I take every word back. Affleck is an idiot. How 'bout John Grisham? |
|
After seeing Affleck being so inarticulate on Bill Maher tonight, I'm for looking around for another possible candidate.
I wish we could talk John Grisham into running. He's a brilliant man, novelist, and an attorney.
|
lynne
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-08-05 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
19. A name recognized as "Hollywood Elite" - |
|
- has a snowball's chance in hell in Virginia. If you don't know that then you don't know the first thing about the people of this state.
Name recognition may be important but where that name is recognized from is even MORE important. They can run Affleck up the pole if they want but it will be a waste of time and money and will just give us another lost election.
|
Penndems
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-09-05 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #19 |
21. Here, here Lynne - so true |
|
There's Arlington and Fairfax Counties, and then there's the rest of the state. And the rest of the state most certainly doesn't think like Northern Virginia.
Mention Ben Affleck's name to folks outside the Beltway and they think:
1. Hollywood actor (Liberal)
2. From Massachusetts (Yankee Liberal)
3. Moving into a Southern state (Damn Yankee Liberal)
Moderate or conservative Dems they're more accepting of. Liberals just absolutely *DO NOT* get elected to the Governor's Mansion or to Congress.
|
safi0
(993 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-06-05 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #13 |
15. There's widespread belief |
|
Among VA Republicans that John Warner will not seek re-election in 08, if that occurs the man who's being talked up as a possible replacement for him is former RNC Chariman Ed Gillespie
|
Penndems
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-09-05 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
20. They may be uttering Gillespie's name in public, but in private |
|
their candidate will be Tom Davis. It's no secret that Davis has been impatiently waiting for John Warner to retire, so that he can run for the Senate.
|
safi0
(993 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-14-05 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
|
Have in the wings. If Mark Warner doesn't end up on the ticket, and he runs he'd be the obvious favorite right? Other than him though who else is there? Would Bobby Scott be a fomidable candidate?
|
Zynx
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-08-05 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
18. Warner never held elected office before and he has been a good Gov. |
Duppers
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-07-05 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
17. I like him. Sorry BlueLady, I didn't see your post. |
FyurFly
(512 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-09-05 09:49 PM
Response to Original message |
|
And that's good, but this guy has lots and lots of skeletons in his closet. Strippers, drinking, gambling. This doesn't make him a bad man, but I can't see him getting elected in Virginia, California maybe, Virginia no way.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun Sep 21st 2025, 05:33 AM
Response to Original message |