Doctor_J
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-09-05 09:40 AM
Original message |
| From IL - Should Mark take a pass on the WH and unseat Allen next year? |
|
Edited on Wed Nov-09-05 09:41 AM by TOJ
First things first. Barring another LIHOP, it seems from here it would bea easy for Warner to send Stupid As W packing enxt year. What say you?
|
| FSogol
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-09-05 10:02 AM
Response to Original message |
| 1. Nah, the Democrats need to find someone else to beat Allen. |
|
Edited on Wed Nov-09-05 10:03 AM by FSogol
Warner is a star, send him to the WH as Pres or VP. How big would winning VA be for our side in 08?
|
| ernstbass
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-09-05 03:11 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Wed Nov-09-05 03:12 PM by ernstbass
He won't do it though - his eyes are on the White House. I'm not certain we have anyone else who could beat Allen next year.
|
| VaYallaDawg
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-09-05 04:30 PM
Response to Original message |
| 3. It's tough to move from Senate to WH. |
|
I'd rather see Mark really rev up his engines and go for the big one. Surely we can find somebody else to taunt Allen during the next election (he says with fingers crossed).
|
| JPZenger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-11-05 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
| 6. I disagree - Senate experience is important |
|
Post 9-11, it will be hard for any candidate to get elected without some international experience. The Senate is a good platform to get that experience.
Many people say that being a senator makes you vulnerable as a Presidential candidate. I totally disagree. When you look at the reasons why Mondale, Gore and Kerry lost, it was not because of they served in the Senate. The attempts to attack Kerry's senate record were weak and didn't matter much in the end.
Who is going to run against Allen in 2006?
|
| Borgnine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-09-05 04:46 PM
Response to Original message |
| 4. Warner would be a viable VP candidate, if not the head of the ticket. |
|
The Senate is important, but like others have said, we need to wisely spend Warner's political capital where it can do the most good.
I think we should save him, but for sure we need to get Warner's and Kaine's campaign managers working on whoever runs against Allen.
|
| DemsUnited
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-09-05 07:37 PM
Response to Original message |
| 5. Warner has already made it real clear that he's giving the Senate |
|
a pass in 2006. He clearly has his eyes on 2008. If that doesn't pan out, he will likely run for an open Senate seat in 2010 -- Sen. John Warner (R) is rumored to be retiring.
Will support 200% whatever he decides to do as long as it involves staying in politics!
|
| DaveinMD
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-11-05 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
|
Lt. Gen. Claudia Kennedy?
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)     |
Fri Sep 19th 2025, 11:32 AM
Response to Original message |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
