Dinger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-30-09 09:50 AM
Original message |
senselessbrenner, hee hee |
Bushfire
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-30-09 09:19 PM
Response to Original message |
yourout
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-31-09 01:37 AM
Response to Original message |
2. Boo Fucking Hoo....Mr take my gavel and go home. |
|
I might go buy a high priced bottle of champaign and toast the day that asshole is finally out of office.
|
MadAsHell
(571 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-31-09 04:28 PM
Response to Original message |
3. What is this tread about ... |
|
Could you please include a little snip from the article for us poor country cousins on dial-up? The Journal Sentinel website takes forever to load and they require a login to look at it. Small favor of the article would be a big help in deciding if the article is worth it.
|
ewagner
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-01-09 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. Here ya go Madashell.... |
|
It's really pretty funny...Senslessbrenner is hitching a ride on the GOP WAAAAAAabulance! :rofl:
Then, the Menomonee Falls Republican watched his party lose the White House. Now, he says, Wisconsin's senators are ignoring him when it comes to nominating federal judges and prosecutors.
The two Democratic senators are under no obligation to consult with Sensenbrenner now that a Democrat is president. But Sensenbrenner, who as Wisconsin's senior Republican worked with the senators on nominations in the Bush administration, says Sens. Herb Kohl and Russ Feingold lost an opportunity at bipartisanship when they failed to involve him in the process.
"They had a chance to be bipartisan," he says. "They played the partisan card."
Kohl's and Feingold's offices declined to comment.
Sensenbrenner says the two snubbed him when they failed to get his input before releasing a list of names for the new federal nominating commission in Wisconsin.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat Sep 20th 2025, 07:01 PM
Response to Original message |