postulater
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-14-11 12:58 PM
Original message |
|
Edited on Thu Jul-14-11 12:59 PM by postulater
|
robinlynne
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-14-11 12:59 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Yesterday the news was that no fake Dems won. |
shraby
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-14-11 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. That was my understanding that no fakes won. |
postulater
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-14-11 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
6. Besides posting this in the wrong forum, maybe I misled readers. |
|
The real Dem (Pasch) did win overall, but the fake Dem actually won in the very affluent suburb of Mequon.
Pasch now meets Darling(R) next month.
|
postulater
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-14-11 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. Mequon is a township within the larger Senate district. |
|
Overall the real Dem won but locally in the affluent suburb, the fake one won. The Repubs must have really wanted to show the Dems a thing or two.
|
Proud Liberal Dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-14-11 01:01 PM
Response to Original message |
3. It's hard to believe that something like that is not considered fraudulent |
|
Edited on Thu Jul-14-11 01:02 PM by Proud Liberal Dem
It was well-publicized too before the fact! :puke: :mad:
WTF has happened to Wisconsin? It seems to have become a Republican "free-fraud zone" since last November.
|
Demonaut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-14-11 01:03 PM
Response to Original message |
5. seriously, are you trying to spread disinformation on purpose? |
|
Edited on Thu Jul-14-11 01:04 PM by Demonaut
|
postulater
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-14-11 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
7. No, I was just pointing out that the Repubs seemed motivated |
|
enough in their stronghold to come out to vote in the Democratic primary.
My post stated the fake Dem won in Mequon.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Sep 24th 2025, 09:26 AM
Response to Original message |