hayrow
(230 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-23-11 10:21 PM
Original message |
Intimidating the old drunk |
|
Apparently the so called Club for Growth is already airing negative ads against Tommy Thompson ahead of his run for Kohl's senate seat next year. Thompson's people claim the Club for Growth is a front for none other than Mark Neumann. With a duo of Ron Johnson and Mark Neumann in the Senate, this state might as well change it's name to Wislahoma.
|
ClassWarrior
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-23-11 10:22 PM
Response to Original message |
CatholicEdHead
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-24-11 10:47 AM
Response to Original message |
2. Tommy Thompson is not enough for today's WI GOP? |
|
It gets stranger and stranger. So Thompson is not as extreme as he needs to be to get the WI GOP nod? It continues to show just how off the rails the Republican party is. It sounds like Neumann is cut out of the Walker cloth and Thompson is too "liberal" in comparison. It is really bad when to be considered one of the party you have to take the hardest and most extreme stances possible.
|
midnight
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-24-11 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. They probably might fall in line if he recommends his |
|
chipping program for illegal aliens, and Americans alike....
|
hayrow
(230 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-24-11 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
4. In last years Repuke primary for governor, Neumann ran to the right of Walker |
Kashka-Kat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-25-11 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
6. OMG not Alfred E Neumann's evil twin again - hasn't he run out of money yet???? |
Kashka-Kat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-25-11 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
5. Well, no! He worked for Bush Admin and the more extreme TPs believe |
|
that Bush was not a "real" Republican. I'm serious - have some evangelical TP relatives who have said this.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Sep 24th 2025, 09:26 AM
Response to Original message |