So what did CBC do this time, to incur the premier’s wrath?
On February 3, the CBC Radio Morning Show convened a media panel comprising Bob Wakeham, formerly of the CBC, Peter Jackson of The Telegram, and host Jeff Gilhooly, to discuss fallout from the premier’s heart surgery story. During that panel, Wakeham spoke about the premier’s divorce. It was not referenced in any sensational manner; Wakeham merely pointed out that media have been perhaps too circumspect in not covering this story.
However, the premier seems to think that such discussion is “irrelevant” and “hurtful,” and this apparently is why he is boycotting CBC. Never mind that the offending comment was not part of news coverage; it was unscripted, and came up during a live guest panel. Does the premier want CBC to control stuff like that? Has he really thought this through, or is he acting on impulse again? Furthermore, the premier is not a journalist, and should not presume to tell the editors at CBC what is “irrelevant”. The editors decide that.
http://www.thetelegram.com/index.cfm?sid=329533&sc=88I was unaware Danny was getting a divorce, altho I presume Newfoundlanders know about it, but it may explain Danny's hostility on a lot of things over the past few years.