|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform |
![]() |
FogerRox
![]() |
Fri Jan-11-08 03:20 PM Original message |
47% undecideds in NH ? NO, not at all, 3 polls and the real undecideds in NH |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau
![]() |
Fri Jan-11-08 03:24 PM Response to Original message |
1. 47% refers to "undecided" and "could you still change your mind" - not the data you show |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FogerRox
![]() |
Fri Jan-11-08 03:30 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. This is directly from the PDF |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau
![]() |
Fri Jan-11-08 04:02 PM Response to Reply #2 |
13. I think we agree - just word usuage - if you're not "definitely decided" you could change your mind |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FogerRox
![]() |
Fri Jan-11-08 04:37 PM Response to Reply #13 |
23. right, but its tuff, if Obama ate a baby on CNN before the election |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau
![]() |
Fri Jan-11-08 10:54 PM Response to Reply #23 |
32. LOL - if I'm decided then I'm decided - the baby was tempting Obama ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Fri Jan-11-08 04:22 PM Response to Reply #2 |
19. Oh, man. This cycle is on course to being dirtier than the last two. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FogerRox
![]() |
Fri Jan-11-08 04:39 PM Response to Reply #19 |
25. Yeah I know, I wanna see the hand count in NH done |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Fri Jan-11-08 04:44 PM Response to Reply #25 |
27. The folks in NH have serious concerns that they won't get a clean recount. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FogerRox
![]() |
Fri Jan-11-08 06:36 PM Response to Reply #27 |
31. I keep thinking Chuck Hagel |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dmallind
![]() |
Fri Jan-11-08 03:37 PM Response to Original message |
3. Look at the difference in the strong support and persuadables |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FogerRox
![]() |
Fri Jan-11-08 03:38 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Which poll ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dmallind
![]() |
Fri Jan-11-08 03:41 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Your own. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FogerRox
![]() |
Fri Jan-11-08 03:45 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. I dont do polling, I cited 3 polls, and I dont see |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dmallind
![]() |
Fri Jan-11-08 03:49 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. Find the 88 and 77 numbers. NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FogerRox
![]() |
Fri Jan-11-08 03:54 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. The Marist poll, OK. What does those numbers mean |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dmallind
![]() |
Fri Jan-11-08 04:04 PM Response to Reply #11 |
15. They mean |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FogerRox
![]() |
Fri Jan-11-08 04:12 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. I am not comfortable explaining the 88 & 77 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dmallind
![]() |
Fri Jan-11-08 04:29 PM Response to Reply #17 |
20. Well let's see |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FogerRox
![]() |
Fri Jan-11-08 04:33 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. "In short, his support was weaker and less driven." of course |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dmallind
![]() |
Fri Jan-11-08 03:40 PM Response to Original message |
5. Furthermore your own data shows this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FogerRox
![]() |
Fri Jan-11-08 03:48 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. Correct, & small technical point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dmallind
![]() |
Fri Jan-11-08 03:53 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. A poll is just a poll |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FogerRox
![]() |
Fri Jan-11-08 03:58 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. Good commentary, thank you, I think I tend to agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
99th_Monkey
![]() |
Fri Jan-11-08 04:03 PM Response to Original message |
14. It means NH needs to conduct a recount of optically scanned ballots |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FogerRox
![]() |
Fri Jan-11-08 04:07 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. YES, but Randi Rhodes was saying that there were 47% undecideds |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
99th_Monkey
![]() |
Fri Jan-11-08 05:02 PM Response to Reply #16 |
28. Why do we allow ourselves to be constantly "divided & conquered"? go figur. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yodermon
![]() |
Fri Jan-11-08 04:18 PM Response to Original message |
18. A summary of final polls |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FogerRox
![]() |
Fri Jan-11-08 04:29 PM Response to Reply #18 |
21. Like I said in the OP 3 days out 90%+ have decided |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dmallind
![]() |
Fri Jan-11-08 04:38 PM Response to Reply #21 |
24. Not so fast |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FogerRox
![]() |
Fri Jan-11-08 04:42 PM Response to Reply #24 |
26. Those are not similar polls measuring the same thing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dmallind
![]() |
Fri Jan-11-08 05:18 PM Response to Reply #26 |
29. I did. I still am doing. Sorry! NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FogerRox
![]() |
Fri Jan-11-08 06:33 PM Response to Original message |
30. Kickin... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OnTheOtherHand
![]() |
Mon Jan-14-08 06:55 PM Response to Reply #30 |
36. Foger, sorry I missed the party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff
![]() |
Fri Jan-11-08 11:05 PM Response to Original message |
33. The problem is the descrepancy between machine and hand counted ballots. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FogerRox
![]() |
Sat Jan-12-08 01:58 PM Response to Reply #33 |
34. Right, In addition the case for undecideds making the difference dosn't wash |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truedelphi
![]() |
Mon Jan-14-08 06:26 PM Response to Reply #33 |
35. I was initially agreeing with you on that, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sun Jun 16th 2024, 01:25 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC