|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform |
![]() |
JMDEM
![]() |
Fri Jan-11-08 05:42 PM Original message |
NH hand counts and optical counts are mirror images |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DJ13
![]() |
Fri Jan-11-08 05:44 PM Response to Original message |
1. Sounds like the machine results were setup |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OnTheOtherHand
![]() |
Fri Jan-11-08 06:00 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. no, that wouldn't have been devious at all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ORDagnabbit
![]() |
Fri Jan-11-08 05:44 PM Response to Original message |
2. okay...but what does that mean? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluerthanblue
![]() |
Fri Jan-11-08 05:45 PM Response to Original message |
3. dupe- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ORDagnabbit
![]() |
Fri Jan-11-08 05:50 PM Response to Original message |
4. okay took a while to wrap my head around it....very wierd. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
doublethink
![]() |
Fri Jan-11-08 10:03 PM Response to Reply #4 |
22. Great visual with your signature line under those figures .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JMDEM
![]() |
Fri Jan-11-08 05:51 PM Response to Original message |
5. This is so bizarre that I am formulating a new theory... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K Gardner
![]() |
Fri Jan-11-08 06:09 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. And/Or... another theory.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JMDEM
![]() |
Fri Jan-11-08 06:11 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. Uh oh.... nt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stevepol
![]() |
Sat Jan-12-08 06:16 AM Response to Reply #7 |
25. Or yet another theory: Ken Hajjar or some of the other |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laconicsax
![]() |
Fri Jan-11-08 06:21 PM Response to Reply #5 |
9. There are some other possibilities |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maven
![]() |
Fri Jan-11-08 08:14 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Fri Jan-11-08 06:26 PM Response to Reply #5 |
10. Make the Democrats look overheated, make election fraud look tinfoil |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maven
![]() |
Fri Jan-11-08 08:13 PM Response to Reply #5 |
12. This problem with the theory in the OP is that many of the hand counts came in last. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maven
![]() |
Fri Jan-11-08 08:09 PM Response to Original message |
11. These "percentages" are misleading. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2
![]() |
Fri Jan-11-08 08:26 PM Response to Original message |
14. This whole conspiracy theory is based on faulty math logic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aptastik
![]() |
Fri Jan-11-08 08:47 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. While I understand why "the math" happened, I don't understand |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2
![]() |
Fri Jan-11-08 08:54 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. Please forgive me for posting an essay |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
philly_bob
![]() |
Sat Jan-12-08 12:19 AM Response to Reply #16 |
23. If pre-election polls, actual results, and exit polls line up, no recount. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stillcool
![]() |
Tue Jan-15-08 01:09 PM Response to Reply #16 |
36. Many states already employ.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff
![]() |
Fri Jan-11-08 09:07 PM Response to Original message |
17. Maybe that's why Iowa wasn't rigged too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JanusAscending
![]() |
Mon Jan-14-08 10:54 PM Response to Reply #17 |
31. They couldn't posibly "rig" Iowa. It wasn't a primary ......... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran
![]() |
Fri Jan-11-08 09:51 PM Response to Original message |
18. Hillary got 9.6% hand counted ballots, Obama got 10.8% hand counted ballots |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff
![]() |
Fri Jan-11-08 09:54 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. I think you're missing the point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran
![]() |
Fri Jan-11-08 09:56 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. I hope the total of all the votes cast = 100% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff
![]() |
Fri Jan-11-08 10:03 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. Who said it didn't? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kip Humphrey
![]() |
Sat Jan-12-08 12:58 AM Response to Original message |
24. Easy solution to this whole mess: switch the machine counted vote between Hillary and Obama and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OnTheOtherHand
![]() |
Sat Jan-12-08 06:26 AM Response to Reply #24 |
26. and absolutely untrue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Roland99
![]() |
Sat Jan-12-08 12:14 PM Response to Original message |
27. Ok, you have my attention now!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff
![]() |
Mon Jan-14-08 09:31 PM Response to Original message |
28. It's the simple things that matter. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
riqster
![]() |
Mon Jan-14-08 10:26 PM Response to Original message |
29. People who opppose transparent elections belong in the Republican Party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtLiberty
![]() |
Mon Jan-14-08 10:38 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. I confront both nervous Nellies and GOP hacks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
diva77
![]() |
Tue Jan-15-08 12:45 AM Response to Original message |
32. were there other races on the ballots? how did they differ in the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
riqster
![]() |
Tue Jan-15-08 08:22 AM Response to Reply #32 |
33. In this case, it's not relevant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OnTheOtherHand
![]() |
Tue Jan-15-08 09:01 AM Response to Reply #32 |
34. only president and vice-president |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
riqster
![]() |
Tue Jan-15-08 10:35 AM Response to Reply #34 |
35. Bears repeating: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
diva77
![]() |
Tue Jan-15-08 03:34 PM Response to Reply #34 |
37. were any polls conducted for the vp candidates? any comparison btw those |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OnTheOtherHand
![]() |
Tue Jan-15-08 04:17 PM Response to Reply #37 |
38. on the first, I really doubt it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
diva77
![]() |
Tue Jan-15-08 04:41 PM Response to Reply #38 |
39. OTOH I know you are in academia (at least I think you are) ...I do not under- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OnTheOtherHand
![]() |
Tue Jan-15-08 06:04 PM Response to Reply #39 |
40. excuse me... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sun Jun 16th 2024, 03:32 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC