Kenergy
(834 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-31-06 11:58 PM
Original message |
'Fiasco' by Thomas E. Ricks... |
|
I thought this was a good read...It's a long read...about 439 pages, but I felt it was an interesting perspective of this botched war in Iraq. I didn't agree with him on some things, but an interesting read nonetheless.
|
TomClash
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-01-07 12:08 AM
Response to Original message |
illinoisprogressive
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-01-07 12:17 AM
Response to Original message |
2. I have a stack of about 5 books and fiasco is in the middle. |
|
I have to first finish Greatest Story Ever Sold and Imperial Life in the Emerald City. I have heard Fiasco is top notch.
|
FastHorizon
(70 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-09-07 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
Imperial Life in the Emerald City. Highly recommended.
|
Skittles
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-01-07 12:59 AM
Response to Original message |
|
a couple of things you did not agree with him on - please, thanks
|
Kenergy
(834 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-01-07 03:06 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. It's no so much I disagree with him, but |
|
I felt he should have mentioned the Downing Street memo, and also Chalabi's activities prior to Bushco taking over. Other than those two things, the book imo was first rate.
|
Skittles
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-01-07 03:16 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
LSK
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-01-07 12:39 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Im about 100 pages into it |
BurtWorm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-02-07 12:45 PM
Response to Original message |
7. It is for the most part an excellent summary of what has gone wrong in Iraq |
|
and why. Very few in the administration come off well, and some come off as real villains. Not that Ricks is manipulating the facts to present a partisan picture--not at all. He just doesn't pull the punches American journalists are trained to pull to seem "fair" and "balanced."
The big creeps in the narrative: Cheney, of course, particularly for forcing the "dialogue" on Iraq to the far right before it was even out of the gate in August 2002; Wolfowitz, for having his head stuck way up his ass from day one; Bremer, for making two of the most disastrous decisions in almost immediate succession upon his arrival in Baghdad in late spring 2003, mistakes the "coalition" and the Iraqi people are still paying dearly for; Myers for being a stinking sycophant; Sanchez for being in above his head and responding to it by shutting down; Rumsfeld for caring more about his power than about doing his job well. And, of course, Bush, for being utterly and hopelessly without a clue--even to his utter, hopeless cluelessness.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun Oct 05th 2025, 09:33 AM
Response to Original message |